what cars can we beat stock, that are stock and that are in our class

[tritonheat1]

Stock Vs Stock

MSP will kill:

(Integra's): RS/GS/LS/ and GS-R, Maybe Type-R
(Civic's): all of them
(Accord's): all of them except the 03 V-6 6-spd coupe
(celica's): all of them
(Prelude Type-SH): driver's race but most likely MSP
(Sentra's): all of them


MSP loses to:

(03 Accord V-6 6-spd coupe)
S2000
RX-8
350Z
00+Mustang GT
Camaro SS
TT Supra
TT 300ZX
TT 3000GT
TT RX-7
NSX


Topspeed wise, MSP will lose to:

Integra Type-R (143mph)
Prelude Type-SH (139mph)
Accord V-6 6spd (130mph)
Etc....

I don't know, i might be wrong. I think this is right but if not, please correct me if i'am wrong.

 

[BigGun22]

i have beaten 1) 97 mustang gt w/pipes, 2) 92 i-roc z 3) 97 turbo eclipse 4) 00 civic si 5) 96 accord w 50 shot of nos 6) 91 crx si 10) nissan spec V 11)98 prelude 12)02 camaro v-6

 

[INGREXCO]

i know we smoke the s*** out of Mustang V6s i knocked the dust off of a bmw 325i *haha father son race* we coudl easily rip the s*** out of a Mercedes C230 most V6s ide say we should be able to hang with...

so ad
BMW 325i
Mercedes C230
Mustang V6
Mazda Miata for sure

 

[InsidiousMSP]

Civics? Sentras? Accords?

Damn guys, give $70 to Joe P, crank it to 10psi, and then start running with E36 M3s, Audi S4s, WRXs, etc from a roll.

 

[SaaBaaDoo]

I beat an RSX Type S about a month ago, and being one of my friends and knowing him....he is a damn good driver!

Had a really tough time with a SHO taurus last night, I didn't think those cars were all that quick!!! Got me good in the straight, but once the road started having some curves, he back off real quick!

Anyone know what the hell is under the hoods in those???

 

[RyanJayG]

depends on the year:

http://home.pon.net/hunnicutt/SHOpage.htm

 

[InsidiousMSP]

SHO taurus

(sad2)

Please guys... (sad1)

 

[Kenetix]

I believe the SHO's run a Yamaha developed High Output V6.

 

[jred321]

unless it's a later year one, then it is a small v-8

 

[Micah]

i have beaten 1) 97 mustang gt w/pipes, 2) 92 i-roc z 3) 97 turbo eclipse 4) 00 civic si 5) 96 accord w 50 shot of nos 6) 91 crx si 10) nissan spec V 11)98 prelude 12)02 camaro v-6

2) 92 i-roc z ???????????

Sorry, I'm going to call bulls*** on this. First off, an I-roc would eat our cars with no problem. "The IROC-Z TPI 350 is now rated at 245 hp at 4400 rpm with 345 lbs.-ft. of torque at 3200 rpm", that was for the 1990. Which brings me to my final point, 1990 was the final year for IROC's. Chevy ended their association with the organizers of the International Race of Champions and 1990 was the final year. Z-28 became the flagship once again.

I'm actually thinking of picking up another 3rd gen camaro, fun cars, cheap and a blast to work on. My mechanic and his father have a 92, z-28 that runs 11.47 in the qtr. I have video of it, if someone wants to see. His dad just got a very large settlement and just spent $12,000 on a new engine, they are making their final run on the 305 at Englishtown's Raceway Park on Wednesday. They are selling the engine if anyone is interested. I think they were asking for $1200. Hell, I was thinking about it.


http://www.thirdgen.org/newdesign/articles/1990iroc.shtml

 

[Familia323]

AE86 stock, 240SX maybe manual, definitely automatic, Camry's Not V6

there is no doubt in my mind that the MSP can beat a stock 240sx.. I have an LX and my friend has a 240sx, manual, with an N1 exhaust and it was too close everytime to say who can win, but if I can hang with it the msp could kill it...

 

[chuyler1]

My mom has a Camry V6 sport package...talk about a fun car to drive. I wish it was a stick though.

Anyway, my g/f's 2000 corolla is slow as molassis. I can't imagine being overtaken by one unless it had a shitload of mods.

 

[BakaFoo]

I lost to a 2003 3.2 CL Type S 6 spd the other day! I was rather embarrased. Beat me from a roll and a standstill.

However I absolutely destroyed a suski swift the other day! ahahaha

 

[TitaniumSpeed]

realize that the MSP is only somewhat quick off the line (0-60 in 6.8 seconds by motortrend)...prolly wouldn't look to much to take people light to light (stock)....but look at all the people auto-xing in this thing and and it will renew your performance faith in this car...several people are taking this thing STOCK and REALLY doing well in the auto-x...not to mention loving every single second of it!!!

 

[Elderain]

I lost to a 2003 3.2 CL Type S 6 spd the other day! I was rather embarrased. Beat me from a roll and a standstill.

However I absolutely destroyed a suski swift the other day! ahahaha

My dad has an acura 2003 3.2 TL type S, i have to get him to race me. Its a damn fast car, but even he said if its anything but straight I would eat him up something bad. I think his car is a bit faster then mine however. Mines still more fun

 

[melicha8]

There is a well covered discussion on why an MSP could beat an RSX-S. It's in the racing motorsports forum I think

 

[275tiMSP]

i took a Stock WRX on the FREEWAY cruisin at 65mph threw- it into 3rd and took him by about car-n-a-half (hit 135) Got 3 Witnesses....but on the other hand i hung with my buddys' WRX. he got the up&down pipe full catback....he took me about a half-a-car...... he had a strong 4th gear......
But yea on the freeway (Stock)MSP will own (Stock)WRX....
off the line....WRX will own....depending on the driver....
"It wont Hurt to Try"

 

[RyanJayG]

Black and white Crown Victorias, Caprice Classics, and Impalas

 

[ForceMP3]

A stock MSP can't beat a stock Integra Type R. The Type R is a little faster.

 

[ForceMP3]

Year 2001
Make Acura
Model Integra
Trim Type R
Transmission 5-speed Manual
Theoretical Top Speed 148 mph
Limited Top Speed

0-30 mph 2.49 s
0-40 mph 3.34 s
0-50 mph 5.23 s
0-60 mph 6.53 s
0-70 mph 9.12 s
0-80 mph 11.16 s
0-90 mph 14.25 s
0-100 mph 17.57 s
0-110 mph 21.20 s
0-120 mph 27.98 s
0-130 mph 37.69 s
0-140 mph 52.44 s

30-50, 2nd gear 2.57 s

100 ft 3.28 s @ 39.37 mph
500 ft 8.40 s @ 66.4 mph
660 ft (1/8 mile) 9.95 s @ 74.12 mph
1320 ft (1/4 mile) 15.24 s @ 93.74 mph
2640 ft (1/2 mile) 23.80 s @ 115.98 mph
5280 ft (1 mile) 38.39 s @ 130.6 mph
7920 ft (1.5 mile) 51.68 s @ 139.6 mph
Year 2003
Make Mazda
Model Protg
Trim MazdaSpeed
Transmission 5-speed Manual
Theoretical Top Speed 135 mph
Limited Top Speed 130 mph

0-30 mph 2.39 s
0-40 mph 4.11 s
0-50 mph 5.43 s
0-60 mph 6.90 s
0-70 mph 9.53 s
0-80 mph 11.80 s
0-90 mph 15.57 s
0-100 mph 19.48 s
0-110 mph 24.40 s
0-120 mph 34.98 s
0-130 mph 54.27 s

30-50, 2nd gear 2.57 s

100 ft 3.32 s @ 34.55 mph
500 ft 8.55 s @ 65.28 mph
660 ft (1/8 mile) 10.13 s @ 72.78 mph
1320 ft (1/4 mile) 15.56 s @ 90.59 mph
2640 ft (1/2 mile) 24.48 s @ 110.14 mph
5280 ft (1 mile) 39.75 s @ 123.43 mph
7920 ft (1.5 mile) 53.92 s @ 129.89 mph
These Numbers could be a little off. I think that Motor Trend had this cars numbers a little faster.