Montana? Big whoop. In N. NV we have these things called the Sierra Nevadas where you can go up 4k' altitude in 20 minutes.
I was simply sharing one of the places where I was paid to drive under winter conditions.
Fact- you can put snows on an awd vehicle too if you want (i had studs on my audi quattro)
Really? Please don't insult my intelligence - I HAVE "snows" on my AWD vehicle.
Fact- if you want, you can always get snows, can't do the same with awd system.
Maybe you misunderstood me. I have nothing against AWD or 4 wheel drive, I have two of them. My issue is people who think either one can replace winter rubber. They are the bozos I see holding up the sensible drivers.
Fact- if you don't have awd in CA, you'll have to chain up
So what? I have no issues with AWD. But don't think that because your car is legally equipped to drive without winter tires or chains that it's safely equipped to drive without winter tires or chains.
Fact- snows can really suck in dry roads.
Fact, when it's cold out, most winter tires will out-perform most all season radials.
Fact- you can get a wreck with all seasons, but you can also get in a wreck with snows too
Please don't insult our intelligence. That is not only obvious, it's irrelevant. In the snow and ice your chances of ending up dead or paralyzed drop dramatically due to the increased performance of winter tires.
I pointed out that a current state of the art all season (the conti's) performed admirably in the snow and ice. When they no longer can perform well in the snow, they'll even let you know in the tread.
If you need gimmicks like letters in the tread to know when your tread is losing effectiveness then I don't know what to say. But even a brand new "state of the art" Conti all-season radial sucks on slick, icy roads compared to a real winter tire. I know because I currently drive a car with those silly letters (DWS) in the tread. And they are not comparable to any winter tire I've ever driven on slick ice (not even winter tires from 30 years ago).
Unless you get out of car and eyeball the sidewalls, you have no idea what type of tire is on a car that is on the side of the road.
That's just plain false! Bozos's spin off the road and turn "turtle" all the time around here. It mucks everything up, ambulances and other first responders (with real winter tires I might add) needing to get by on the narrow two-lane undivided highway, long delays and generally only going 5-10 mph past the accident scene. Anyone with normal vision can see whether they have A/T tires (most common), all-season radials (second most common) or winter tires (almost never). Of course sometimes it's dark out or they went over a steep embankment and you simply can't see well enough (or at all) to know what type of tires they have. But generally I can get a good look and it's almost always A/T or all-season radials. And almost always AWD or 4x4. Bozos think A/T tires are good in the snow/ice because they look "aggressive". Somebody needs to educate these neophyte drivers as to what works and what doesn't.
The myth of story of awd drivers driving crazy and causing all the wrecks is just that, until you can present data. All kids of vehicles can wreck, generallizations are just dumb.
I don't need data, I can use my own two eyes and one brain. It doesn't take a computer database for the pattern to emerge loud and clear if you drive treacherous roads often enough.