3) Knows what gear it should be in instead of constantly changing/fumbling around
That's almost a given for a Mazda transmission, but to be sure, yes we can add that to the list.
3) Knows what gear it should be in instead of constantly changing/fumbling around
That's almost a given for a Mazda transmission, but to be sure, yes we can add that to the list.
I don’t feel like it really needs many more gears. The thing is adding those really tall gears for hwy only works if the motor can handle it...... If they put the 2.5T in the CX-5 it’d be fine but I’m not sure it would work all that well with the current.
Ergo probably not a lot of advantage over the current 6 which I also think does fine.
I actually think more gears will work well with the current 2.5 NA engine. I mean have you guys tried to wind out 2nd or 3rd gear? They are freaking long and pretty slow to accelerate. More gears in between for faster acceleration would be great.
Depends if Toyota sees if Mazda is worthwhile for investing
They must think so enough to invest in the joint assembly plant going in Alabama. With domestic production, Mazda taps into Toyota’s US supply chain. Denso being one. The costs of course will be less and with possible tariffs on imports that lessens the impact as well.
The one thing the Japanese automakers do well is that they stick together as family. As they started manufacturing in the States they brought in their suppliers as well. The chain is unbroken.
Yea I mean I was thoroughly impressed by the ZF 8 speed in the X3. If Mazda’s is anything like that I’m cool with it. It felt set up with 1-6 as close ratio which it worked through quickly and smoothly. Don’t really notice it unless you’re looking at the tach.
They must think so enough to invest in the joint assembly plant going in Alabama. With domestic production, Mazda taps into Toyota’s US supply chain. Denso being one. The costs of course will be less and with possible tariffs on imports that lessens the impact as well.
The one thing the Japanese automakers do well is that they stick together as family. As they started manufacturing in the States they brought in their suppliers as well. The chain is unbroken.
This engine more than likely reached the end of it's tuning life. Don't think they can extract much more out of it be it fuel economy or power/torque (acceleration etc) and adding more gears might not help as people expect.
Hello 2.5T & SkyActiv-X
The current engine hardly running in its current state. It could easily throw out a good bit more power,but yes,bring on the 2.5T...
If they weren’t using the cycle they are it could have more power. But this engine is designed for efficiency before power.
The recent power and torque increases have been incremental to the engine that has essentially been the same since 2012/2013 when it first appeared (2KW & 2NM increases for KF/KG) plus they've added cylinder deativation for better fuel consumption. So if you go by these, it appears they can't do that much more to the motor.
Also note that SkyActv-X is "the next generation" which means funds research and development has moved to that.
I think they could but they are betting the farm on X and just keeping it going with small updates. They don’t have the R&D resources to focus hard on both I bet.
If they could then should have been done much sooner and larger increases.
(iagree) with R&D resources are lacking