How common are Mazdas?

It is pretty well established in the industry and auto media that Mazda owes its very existence to Ford. Mazda went through multiple financial crises that would have likely put them under and most certainly out of the U.S. market had they not been bankrolled by Ford. It takes more than passion to keep an auto company afloat during hard times.

Doesn't change the junk they put out during ford's ownership.
 
Since un-merging with FoMoCo, Mazda has done a bang up job of rejuvenating their lineup.
Car & Driver ranks small SUVs; the Mazda CX 5 is #1 and the Honda CR-V is #3.

Mazdas ethos is to blend its sports-car know-how into every model, and the CX-5 is no exceptionsharp steering and a poised chassis make it the enthusiasts pick.
A 155-hp 2.0-liter four, six-speed manual and front-drive are standard; a 184-hp 2.5-liter four, six-speed auto and all-wheel drive are optional.
The smart cabin, easy-to-use touchscreen infotainment and optional safety techadaptive cruise, autonomous emergency braking and moreunderscore the CX-5s standing as a great all-rounder.

http://www.caranddriver.com/honda/cr-v
 
They are very popular here in Canada! You cannot go more than a few KM without seeing a Mazda 3 or CX 5 on the road.
 
Mazdas are much more popular in Canada and in Australia as compared to the U.S. Then again the U.S. is the land of the CVT and numb handling.
 
Last edited:
I have long felt that the US gets utterly shafted when it comes to automobiles.

To Mazda's credit they historically tend to shaft us less then other makers. Honda Type R's come to mind also older model civics and fits that had projectors while the U.S. ones got halogens reflectors.
 
Maybe it's due to the availability of Mazdas here in my vicinity, but I know of several people with Mazdas. Among the 13 houses on my street, 3 have CX-5s (myself included). I previously had a '14 3s GT hatch. Among friends, two have Mazda 6s. My grandmother drives a CX-5, another grandfather has a 2000 MX-5, two of my sister-in-laws have Mazda3s (1st gen and a 2nd gen)

Parents bought a Subaru Forester because they didn't want to be seen as copycats? 😕

Prior to my Mazdas, I drove Hondas - an '07 Civic & '92 Accord. Wife drives an '11 Accord.

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
 
Trying to spin Mazda's sales numbers for the CX (and the whole Mazda lineup) as somehow being underwhelming and a disappointment for the brand is pretty lame and just not true as are many other opinions this same member expresses.
In 2015, CX-5 is the top seller for Mazda in the US market. One month of sales data doesn't indicate the trend of sales. I tabulated sales figures on compact CUVs in the US market since 2012, the first year CX-5 was coming to the States, for comparison. These numbers speak for themselves that Mazda's sales numbers on CX-5 are indeed underwhelming:

The Top Four in 2015:

Honda
CR-V

Volume
Volume Increase
Yearly
% Increase
Yearly

Comments
2012281,652--New 4th Gen
2013303,904+22,252+7.90%
2014335,019+31,115+10.24%
2015345,647+10,628+3.17%Facelift
2016 *YTD100,1014 Months

Toyota
RAV4

Volume
Volume Increase
Yearly
% Increase
Yearly

Comments
2012171,877--
2013218,249+46,372+26.98%New 4th Gen
2014267,698+49,449+22.66%
2015315,412+47,714+17.82%
2016 *YTD106,274 4 Months

Ford
Escape

Volume
Volume Increase
Yearly
% Increase
Yearly

Comments
2012261,008--New 3rd Gen
2013295,993+34,985+13.40%
2014306,212+10,219+3.45%
2015306,492+280+0.09%
2016 *YTD95,5144 Months

Nissan
Rogue

Volume
Volume Increase
Yearly
% Increase
Yearly

Comments
2012142,349--
2013162,751+20,402+14.33%
2014199,199+36,448+22.39%New 2nd Gen
2015287,190+87,991+44.17%
2016 *YTD92,2094 Months

Two in the Bottom Bunch in 2015

Subaru
Forester

Volume
Volume Increase
Yearly
% Increase
Yearly

Comments
201276,347--
2013123,592+47,245+61.88%
2014159,953+36,361+29.42%New 4th Gen
2015175,192+15,239+9.53%
2016 *YTD52,9174 Months

Mazda
CX-5

Volume
Volume Increase
Yearly
% Increase
Yearly

Comments
201243,319--New 1st Gen
201379,544+36,225+83.62%
201499,122+19,578+24.61%
2015111,450+12,328+12.44%Facelif
2016 *YTD32,4334 Months
 
Some trims are relatively inexpensive but trying to pin the cheapo tag on them is BS that I am sure many who visit here already recognize and which I am happy to disprove.
Mazda themselves positioned CX-5 as a cheaper model in their lineups. It also save some cost for them. You'll find memory seat, rear AC vents, one-touch up-down power windows for four with lights on switches, dash tweeters for Bose system, a covered door for left dash cubby, dead pedal cover, LED interior lights, glove compartment light, courtesy lights, etc. are all featured in Mazda6 which has similar interior design, but eliminated in CX-5.
 
Haha I was scrolling through this page real quick to the end and through that scrolling I saw a list of sales from a bunch of car companies. One thought, there's yrwei52 at it again lol his go to post
 
"... The smart cabin, easy-to-use touchscreen infotainment and optional safety techadaptive cruise, autonomous emergency braking and moreunderscore the CX-5s standing as a great all-rounder.
All of those fancy high-tech features are irrelevant if Mazda can't figure out fast why the NHTSA frontal crash test ratings on 2016 CX-5 dropped from 5 stars for previous MYs to 3 stars on passenger side. Mind you 3-star rating is below industry average as most competitors in the same class are having at least 4 stars!

Speaking about easy-to-use touchscreen infotainment, where is the live traffic feature for 2016 GPS system clearly stated in the 2016 CX-5 sales brochure?
 
I do not think Mazda has never wanted to be the top producer like Toyota or Honda. So I feel comparing sales numbers to them is just not relevant.

Do you want a plain vanilla twinkie snack cake pumped out of a mass production factory with very little flavor? Or would you rather have a carefully crafted and delicious morsel made by an enthusiast that enjoys the passion, emotions, and taste bud tingling that a quality product can invoke.

I have had many other cars besides Mazda's, but always return to them when I want to enjoy the driving experience again.
 
I do not think Mazda has never wanted to be the top producer like Toyota or Honda. So I feel comparing sales numbers to them is just not relevant.

Do you want a plain vanilla twinkie snack cake pumped out of a mass production factory with very little flavor? Or would you rather have a carefully crafted and delicious morsel made by an enthusiast that enjoys the passion, emotions, and taste bud tingling that a quality product can invoke.

I have had many other cars besides Mazda's, but always return to them when I want to enjoy the driving experience again.

I agree. Yrwei52 doesn't understand that concept though of Mazda. That's why he always posts those same damn statistics that mean nothing. He seems to think Mazda is failing if they're not selling the amount of companies such as Toyota, Honda. But that's not Mazdas gameplay otherwise they would of changed years ago.
 
I agree. Yrwei52 doesn't understand that concept though of Mazda. That's why he always posts those same damn statistics that mean nothing. He seems to think Mazda is failing if they're not selling the amount of companies such as Toyota, Honda. But that's not Mazdas gameplay otherwise they would of changed years ago.

Well it is a very odd concept that conflicts with conventional capitalist wisdom.

After FORD dumped it's majority stake in Mazda, Mazda had to do a gut check and decide if they wanted to go to battle with the Big 3 Japan motors, or just be happy with their small position.

They developed an interesting strategy instead... they went all in on designing the SKYACTIV engines and chassis, making certain that quality, efficiency, and scalability were paramount. They wanted to reduce costs long term, and at the same time increase the brands image as a reliable alternative to the big 3 Japan. In addition, having many different engines and chassis' also make it difficult for a dealers service department to perform and maintain a high level of satisfaction for the customer.

There are also dangers of this strategy, and one of them is having a fault or engineering failure on a part or component, and since you have used it on every car you produced, you have a massive overhead / recall problem.

Another problem is that when the "Vanilla" car drivers come to drive a Mazda and they are not pleased with the tighter driving dynamics, noise, vibration, feel that enthusiasts look for. So they have to dial back some of that feel, for sake of the comfort, at the risk of alienating the enthusiasts. It is a delicate balance indeed...

So in fact over the last 5 years the Mazda's have indeed gotten a bit more vanilla, but they had no choice if they wanted to stay an independent car company. The benefit of selling a lot more vanilla pudding, is that I would expect us to be receiving some special desserts from Mazda soon...
 
Well it is a very odd concept that conflicts with conventional capitalist wisdom.

After FORD dumped it's majority stake in Mazda, Mazda had to do a gut check and decide if they wanted to go to battle with the Big 3 Japan motors, or just be happy with their small position.

They developed an interesting strategy instead... they went all in on designing the SKYACTIV engines and chassis, making certain that quality, efficiency, and scalability were paramount. They wanted to reduce costs long term, and at the same time increase the brands image as a reliable alternative to the big 3 Japan. In addition, having many different engines and chassis' also make it difficult for a dealers service department to perform and maintain a high level of satisfaction for the customer.

There are also dangers of this strategy, and one of them is having a fault or engineering failure on a part or component, and since you have used it on every car you produced, you have a massive overhead / recall problem.

Another problem is that when the "Vanilla" car drivers come to drive a Mazda and they are not pleased with the tighter driving dynamics, noise, vibration, feel that enthusiasts look for. So they have to dial back some of that feel, for sake of the comfort, at the risk of alienating the enthusiasts. It is a delicate balance indeed...

So in fact over the last 5 years the Mazda's have indeed gotten a bit more vanilla, but they had no choice if they wanted to stay an independent car company. The benefit of selling a lot more vanilla pudding, is that I would expect us to be receiving some special desserts from Mazda soon...

I agree with this. I like the dessert analogy and now I would like some dessert.

food_porn_desserts_19.jpg
 
The last two posts explain Mazda's strategy since their uncoupling with Ford.
According to most auto journalists, US News, Consumer Reports, etc. they hit home runs with the Mazda 3, the CX 5, and the new CX 3.
The flagship CX 9 is already getting rave reviews and this trend should continue.
Especially when gas prices start going back up.
 
I'm not worried about being the top dog in Sales figures so long as the car manufacturer engineers quality vehicles with new innovation whilst maintaining sustainable profits to enable growth. As mentioned before Mazda is not a huge company compared to Toyota, Honda etc but they are definitely the most exciting mainstream Japanese car manufacturer.

They are obviously doing something right for Toyota to form a mutual partnership with them.

Quote:
The two leaders heaped praise on the other’s organisation. Toyoda noted that Mazda’s Skyactiv drivetrains and Kodo design direction prove that its new partner “always thinks of what is coming next for vehicles and technology”.

Kogai in turn commended Toyota for its “steadfast resolve on global environmental issues and the future of manufacturing”. Both parties believe that Mazda’s focus on “joy” and Toyota’s mantra of “ever-better cars” overlap in significant ways.

These words of mutual praise can be read as coded hints confirming a report yesterday that Mazda will provide Toyota with Skyactiv engines and drivetrain components, while the smaller partner gains access to Toyota’s fuel cell technology.
 
^ Totally agree with you.

The CX is very, very, popular down under.
Australia's best selling SUVs so far in 2016:
1. Mazda CX 5 - 2156
2. Hyundai Tucson - 1849
3. Nissan X Trail - 1669
4. Toyota RAV 4 - 1514

http://www.whichcar.com.au/car-news/top-10-selling-suvs-in-australia-february-2016

For 2015:
1. Mazda CX-5 25,136
2. Toyota RAV4 18,435
3. Nissan X-Trail 17,971
4. Subaru Forester 12,029
5. Mitsubishi Outlander 10,884

http://www.businessinsider.com.au/these-are-the-top-selling-suvs-in-australia-2016-1
 
I agree. Yrwei52 doesn't understand that concept though of Mazda. That's why he always posts those same damn statistics that mean nothing. He seems to think Mazda is failing if they're not selling the amount of companies such as Toyota, Honda. But that's not Mazdas gameplay otherwise they would of changed years ago.
Apparently either you cherry pick the posts you want to see, or you simply ignore the sequence of post in this thread and start doing personal attacks without any merit!

JSB33 posted the sales numbers on CX-5. I merely made a comment. Dr. Awkward then responded with one-month sales figure to prove my comment on low sales number "is pretty lame and just not true"! I then replied with 5-year sales figures for major compact CUVs to show CX-5 sales are indeed at the bottom of the list. So what's wrong with posting the most recent sales data and not the same data like you implied? Especially when other member presented wrong information?

It seems you feel you're the higher authority of this forum who can criticize any posts you don't like even if it's the fact, and set up rules to pick and choose what kind of information we can post! It's your own business if you choose to bury your head in the sand and ignore the facts. But the fact of matter is you have no authority to control what we can post in this forum, especially if it's the fact!

I think it's ridiculous by saying Mazda doesn't want to sell more CX-5's in the US!

When you're interviewing for a sales VP job, try to tell the head of Mazda North American Operations that those damn sales statistics that mean nothing and your goal is to keep the sales of CX-5 staying at the bottom of the list! If you'd get hired the sun will be rising from the West! ;)

From the sales figure so far this year, CX-5 seems getting not much improved comparing to the same January to April period last year.
Trying to spin Mazda's sales numbers for the CX (and the whole Mazda lineup) as somehow being underwhelming and a disappointment for the brand is pretty lame and just not true as are many other opinions this same member expresses.
Like the CX is a cheap car.
Some trims are relatively inexpensive but trying to pin the cheapo tag on them is BS that I am sure many who visit here already recognize and which I am happy to disprove.
Mazda North American Operations reported December 2015 U.S. sales of 29,294 vehicles, an increase of 18.1 percent versus December 2014 and the best December since 1994. The company also reported calendar year (CY) 2015 total (combined fleet and retail) sales in the U.S. of 319,184, up 4.4 percent over 2014 and the best result since 1994 (20 years).
Note that this includes lower numbers for the CX 9 which will be re-booted this summer.
http://insidemazda.mazdausa.com/pre...increase-december-best-annual-sales-20-years/
 
^ Totally agree with you.

The CX is very, very, popular down under.
Australia's best selling SUVs so far in 2016:
1. Mazda CX 5 - 2156
2. Hyundai Tucson - 1849
3. Nissan X Trail - 1669
4. Toyota RAV 4 - 1514

http://www.whichcar.com.au/car-news/top-10-selling-suvs-in-australia-february-2016

For 2015:
1. Mazda CX-5 – 25,136
2. Toyota RAV4 – 18,435
3. Nissan X-Trail – 17,971
4. Subaru Forester – 12,029
5. Mitsubishi Outlander – 10,884

http://www.businessinsider.com.au/these-are-the-top-selling-suvs-in-australia-2016-1

Wow the CX-5 outsold the RAV4!
 
Back