Nothing wrong with disagreeing. Nothing wrong with being wrong. It's only when someone gets persistently abusive that I would agree with banning.
I participated in a forum in which posters met up in real life. Persistent abuse led to threats of violence using guns. Somebody hired a private detective, charges were laid, and it went to court. A Seattle judge banned one participant from posting online for a year. In comparison, this is a cake walk.
The fact that I haven't tuned my car yet is simple common sense. The tunes were developed using a tiny fraction of the resources at Mazda's disposal. If the tuned version was shown to be safe, effective and meet ALL the claims bandied about on various forums, I would purchase them in a heartbeat.
But the truth of the matter is, they have NOT been proven and they were not developed to the same high technical standards for carbon/valve buildup, durability and longevity that Mazda demanded. Matt doesn't know half the design constraints Mazda used during development, he just nodded them to increase output.
The fact that I have chosen not to run his tunes shouldn't prohibit me from weighing in with my opinion.
First, the "truth of the matter" is really just your opinion. We have gone above and beyond to prove our claims. The fact you don't read it is not our fault. "matt doesn't know half the design constraints mazda used during development, he just nedded them to increase output" Glad you're making HUGE assumptions about us. We have friends who are engineers at mazda so you're completely wrong in that aspect.
The fact you have a thread of people wanting you banned proves that you are in fact, a troll.
Proof to you must mean something vastly different than it does to me.
Your threshold for what constitutes "proof" is just as lacking here as it is in your business claims. The only person foolish enough to say I should be censored was the OP. Oh, and yourself. You two would probably really like communist China!
I can honestly say that of all the forums I have been active on, I have never seen a call to ban anyone due simply to arrogance ....this kills me!! haha
Mike ... what did you do to piss so many people off??? Dont you know its not nice, not to be nice?? d
DONT CHANGE A THING MIKE!! Maybe I will start a MikeM For President Thread!!! lmfao
Nothing wrong with disagreeing. Nothing wrong with being wrong. It's only when someone gets persistently abusive that I would agree with banning.
I participated in a forum in which posters met up in real life. Persistent abuse led to threats of violence using guns. Somebody hired a private detective, charges were laid, and it went to court. A Seattle judge banned one participant from posting online for a year. In comparison, this is a cake walk.
Is that your go to comment when someone disagrees with you? Communist China!