It could be an economies of scale thing as noted above: some regulation somewhere requires something that only using the headlight will satisfy / that the accent lighting alone won't meet so they build them all that way.
Or.... it could simply be a styling / design decision because it's the way the design team wanted it. Either way it is what it is and the only thing it's doing is making you a little safer on the road.
My own opinion here: I'm a little bored of cars having LED DRL strips for the sake of having LED DRL strips. I feel a lot of the simpler designs out there are just slapped on the car so the manufacturer can advertise that they have LED lights (to WOW the average joe out there) but they don't really add any personality at all. I believe having the headlights projector illuminated is different from typical these days and I think it looks quite good with the ball of sharper light accentuated by the "signature lighting" - adds quite a bit of attitude.
I'd go so far as to say to me it looks like something is missing without the headlight illuminated.
Heck, I even like the "dual light" element that the simpler touring trim headlights make in DRL mode. To my eyes its more interesting to look at than a basic LED strip somewhere in the bumper or in the headlight.
I totally agree! And during the dark it would be worse with amber parking lights on! I believe this's one step backwards by Mazda North American Operations comparing to 1st-gen CX-5. Some sort of mod will be done if I'm getting a 2017/2018 CX-5! And we should send more comments about this to Mazda North American Operations website and urge them to make a change!
Except that you forget about the mirror mounted turn signals that all 2017 CX-5s have. This feature does a great job of mitigating this issue, while allowing the CX-5 to have cool central turn signals.
Except that you forget about the mirror mounted turn signals that all 2017 CX-5s have. This feature does a great job of mitigating this issue, while allowing the CX-5 to have cool central turn signals.
Has anyone seen pictures/videos of these new mirror mounted signal lights in action? Hope these as bright as (if not brighter than) the 2016 design, in which case I absolutely agree it's a reasonable mitigation.
I'd go so far as to say to me it looks like something is missing without the headlight illuminated.
Each to their own I suppose
Can't agree more. I myself am divided, and as you may recall I was asking earlier in this thread if the headlight would steal the show or actually make the DRL look better. Surprisingly I still don't have an answer. Perhaps Mazda should add this option to the personalization screens, given the community is so divided
Has anyone seen pictures/videos of these new mirror mounted signal lights in action? Hope these as bright as (if not brighter than) the 2016 design, in which case I absolutely agree it's a reasonable mitigation.
Maybe it was the video but the mirror-mounted LED turn signals were difficult to see in the daylight.
Nobody else is using low-beam headlights as DRLs nowadays. Not to mention CX-5 already has dedicated LED DRLs. Even thought there's no law in the US preventing it like EU, why do Mazda North American Operations want to add low-beam headlights as part of DRLs which is against convention not only with previous Mazda models, but also all other vehicles in the world? My another concern is the longevity of the LED headlights. When the much hotter LED headlights burn out due to unnecessary over-usage, it'll cost us!Would be nice if they did
IMHO all this conjecture (besides having headlights on all the time) seems to have come about due to headlight design including DRL is more streamlined than the previous model. On that one you could tell clearly DRL's are on. On this model, not so much (see photos previously in this thread).
Nobody else is using low-beam headlights as DRLs nowadays. Not to mention CX-5 already has dedicated LED DRLs. Even thought there's no law in the US preventing it like EU, why do Mazda North American Operations want to add low-beam headlights as part of DRLs which is against convention not only with previous Mazda models, but also all other vehicles in the world? My another concern is the longevity of the LED headlights. When the much hotter LED headlights burn out due to unnecessary over-usage, it'll cost us!
I still have yet to see one in person. My tune may change.Each to their own I suppose
Yes, that's low-intensity halogen high-beam, not full-powered low-beam.Our low spec CX-9's are using halogens as DRL's.
I still have yet to see one in person. My tune may change.
Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
Yes, that's low-intensity halogen high-beam, not full-powered low-beam.