- :
- RDX Aspec Adv.
http://www.caranddriver.com/honda/cr-v
It's everything the 2014-2016.5 CX-5 wishes it could be. I am jelly!
Oh...and someone on here keeps saying 75mph highway cruising should meet EPA and be a matrice. I guess I nailed that mess again. Damn.
Oh, and it handles and stops better and goes faster than the 2016 CX-5, too. There goes that...
I'd never trade a 2 year old CUV for a new CUV, but if I were buying new, I'd have a hard time picking up the less refined and less capable and less economical CX-5 over the new CRV now that they fixed the back half. I think Mazda's saving grace will be Honda's CVT if they have not squared that thing away, yet.
Still, Mazda needs that 2.2D and 2.5T ASAP!
It's everything the 2014-2016.5 CX-5 wishes it could be. I am jelly!
Oh...and someone on here keeps saying 75mph highway cruising should meet EPA and be a matrice. I guess I nailed that mess again. Damn.
Within 1mpg of EPA hwy rating...but...drag? How? Honda gets it...honestly rated highway mpg. Just like every other vehicle I've owned. Except this one. /rantC/D observed 75-mph highway driving: 32 mpg
Oh, and it handles and stops better and goes faster than the 2016 CX-5, too. There goes that...
I'd never trade a 2 year old CUV for a new CUV, but if I were buying new, I'd have a hard time picking up the less refined and less capable and less economical CX-5 over the new CRV now that they fixed the back half. I think Mazda's saving grace will be Honda's CVT if they have not squared that thing away, yet.
Still, Mazda needs that 2.2D and 2.5T ASAP!
Last edited: