C
CX5_Pete
A diff lock would be helpful here. I agree with others that the CX-5 is no rock crawler.
Since we are on the topic of AWD, check this out:
This may not amount to anything in similar situation but try turning on the wipers.... it's already been fairly proven that this forces AWD in from stop situation more readily. Not saying you should have to do this but in in OP's situation I would have also tried this in addition to slight braking.
Actually I had my car up on jacks, and pushing gas made the engine do some wacky things with the AWD. At one point the car was actually adding power when I pushed the brake to stop the wheels (it wouldn't let me), then it was acting like it was gonna stall out (shuttered super bad) so I had to shut the engine off. This is when I was doing testing when people were arguing about the rear wheels being driven all the time.
If a vehicle does not have a "low range" selectable, chances are, it was never meant to leave the road, is the conclusion I've come to.
In regards to the side to side statement, what do you mean?Even if it's not a rock crawler, AWD means that you are able to take it on less than stellar roads. Mazda claims so. After reading the i-Activ Brochure, the AWD system only transmits power front to back and not side to side. I know VW/Audi, Suabru and Mitsu do front to back AND side to side, so that instantly a dead giveaway on why it wasn't able to move past the twist ditch. It's good to know how capable these cars are, just in case you need to try it. Jut because it's not meant to be a rock crawler, doesn't mean it's more than capable to be one. The Outlander proved that to be true, and the CX-5 couldn't. Oh well, it's much better suited on the road.
Since we are on the topic of AWD, check this out:
In regards to the side to side statement, what do you mean?
Curious about the Mitsu's SAWC, I checked it out. It does pretty well.
Here's another, it struggled but it made it over.
Doesn't look any better than the CX-5 Kedis posted earlier..
Here's an outlander without the smart AWD (likely the same system that OP thinks is better than the CX-5's)
It cannot make it up the incline without a running start.
He tried it with the TC on and off, we tried everything, even leaving the pedal at around 50% down for about 1 straight minute to see if it took time for the AWD system to figure things out....it didn't. I remember he had a 2010 Mitsubishi Outlander,(even without their new SAWC system) AWC on the same trail and it did awesome on the twist ditch, the AWD system immediately figured out exactly which wheels had grip and within 3 seconds, we were moving forward. The CX-5 could not handle it. So why is it depicted as being so smart, when it can't even do one basic thing, that is pretty common sense?
Makes sense.The thing is.. a little tiny bit of momentum and line choice can make a huge difference in how a diagonal situation turns out.
Check out this Subaru forester dealing with a similar situation. He couldn't get through until he tried a slightly different approach angle.
Your friend in the Outlander simply choose a better line through the rut and made it seem effortless.. but really it sounds like he just got unlucky in the CX-5.