Hi Everyone! I am new here and am enjoying everyone's thoughts on the CX-9's. Due to buying a house below street level last year I finally have an excuse to buy a CX-9, which I am thrilled about! I of course have a Grand Touring appetite with a Sport budget, so I am choosing between two used vehicles, both immaculately maintained as far as we can tell.
The 2007 is the White Mica Pearl color that I love, fully loaded with NAV/RES, sunroof, rear-view camera, tow package, etc... with 45K highway miles on it for about $3K under KBB and fits well into my budget.
The 2008 is one of the grays (not sure which it is called, but gray is my second color choice) with Nav, rear-view camera, no RES with only 15K miles on it. It is about $2K under KBB but still higher than my budget before taxes, fees, etc...
Is the difference between the first and second years of the CX-9 with the change in the engine so great that there is a noticable difference?
Does anyone here have any thoughts on purchasing one with such high mileage as the 2007 as opposed to the 2008 with such low mileage?
Thanks for any thoughts and advice you are able to give, I appreciate it!
The 2007 is the White Mica Pearl color that I love, fully loaded with NAV/RES, sunroof, rear-view camera, tow package, etc... with 45K highway miles on it for about $3K under KBB and fits well into my budget.
The 2008 is one of the grays (not sure which it is called, but gray is my second color choice) with Nav, rear-view camera, no RES with only 15K miles on it. It is about $2K under KBB but still higher than my budget before taxes, fees, etc...
Is the difference between the first and second years of the CX-9 with the change in the engine so great that there is a noticable difference?
Does anyone here have any thoughts on purchasing one with such high mileage as the 2007 as opposed to the 2008 with such low mileage?
Thanks for any thoughts and advice you are able to give, I appreciate it!