Hey y'all, I'm new to the forum, currently trying to sell my car and wishing for a Mazda 3. My Neon is fun to drive, but I'm hoping to find another fun car that's good on gas and better-built, so I won't be constantly dealing with leaks (water in, oil out).
However, the 3 I'm leaning towards, which got me looking into Mazda 3s to begin with, is a former Hertz rental. My theory is that I'm no grandma driver, so how much harder could they really have driven it? but perhaps my imagination is lacking. Plus, I've read some good things about buying rental cars (supposedly good price on well maintained vehicles)...but at the same time, I'm a little hesitant about buying a "sporty" rental. What are your thoughts on former rental cars?
The one I was leaning towards is this one (2+ hours away from me):
http://www.hertzbillings.com/adw/used_cars/Montana/Billings/2009/Mazda/Mazda3/090117398
And then I found this one (6+ hours away from me):
http://www.mcdonaldmazda.com/vehicle/certified/70028-JM1BK32FX91239875/2009-Mazda-Mazda3.htm
Both are 2009 Mazda 3 i in Copper Red Mica, but the 1st one has manumatic shifting, and the 2nd one appears to be a normal automatic shifter. Was that an option, or is there a chance they're different trim levels? Any ideas on why the 2nd car is less miles and certified, but the 1st car costs more? Obviously the 1st car is more conveniently located. My budget is loosely set at $15k, but I feel more comfortable at the $12-13k mark. Any advice pros & cons between the two or if I should keep looking (and why), would be greatly appreciated! (My husband is sick of hearing about it.) (rolleyes)
Edited to add: or I could go another direction altogether:
Subaru Impreza 2.5i or
Ford Focus SEL. Thoughts?