It's funny how this forum's sentiment is exactly the opposite from the Subaru Forester forum, where many have been vying for the diesel to be brought from Europe to the US.
For me it is strange to hear people that paid extra for the GT trim and fully load it to suddenly pinch their pennies when it comes to significantly better torque and drivability. Yes, it is not clear how economical it would be, but there was nothing economical in a fully loaded vehicle either ... you got it because you wanted it for its benefits and the same is for the diesel, only that for the diesel it might actually be more economical for some owners.
Diesel is somewhat risky, I agree and I can't tell if it will succeed. The American public buys a lot of turds and things that don't make any sense to me. In contrast, the European car market makes much more sense to me and I'd love to get some of the things they have there.
Sure it matters how many dealers you have. My sister skipped on a Mazda because there was only a single dealership in their area which they did not like. Even here, I am not very happy with the Mazda dealership I am using now and the other 2 are farther away, especially if I need to get there during commute hours.
I think it's required to place the 2.2D as the power + fuel-economy option for the CX-5 as a way to justify the additional up-front cost. I am sure the 2.2D is awesome to drive. I am sure also that it can actually get amazing MPG.
Agree with you on this. I would consider a CX-5 Diesel with Signature option (who knows if they will offer this?) as our next car.