They use only metric system in Europe so the prices listed at all gas stations are per liter.Their gallon is bigger than ours.
And the 6-speed automatic transmission for the Mazda 2.2D is different than other gas engines if I remember it correctly. Hence the TCM is different too.
Oh, you're gonna love the SkyActiv-D
I don't "track it" so to speak. I'd say about 38.5 mpg best ever on an all highway trip and maybe 31 mpg on the low end (towing 17.5 mpg).What's your best and worst tanks of fuel in the CX-5?
In other words the real world MPG on US version Mazda CX-5 2.2D diesel is much better than EPA fuel economy rating like it’s supposed to be.I don't "track it" so to speak. I'd say about 38.5 mpg best ever on an all highway trip and maybe 31 mpg on the low end (towing 17.5 mpg).
Overall all inclusive is 32.5 mpg
Maybe they don't cheat, like everyone else?I wonder how did Mazda North American Operations screw up the EPA fuel economy testing and got such poor ratings?
In other words the real world MPG on US version Mazda CX-5 2.2D diesel is much better than EPA fuel economy rating like it’s supposed to be.
EPA Fuel Economy Ratings for 2019 Mazds CX-5 2.2L diesel:
28 city / 31 hwy / 29 MPG combined.
I wonder how did Mazda North American Operations screw up the EPA fuel economy testing and got such poor ratings?
Better than advertised. Range wise, what’s it like? Advertised it’s 429miles I believe. What’s your best and worst?I don't "track it" so to speak. I'd say about 38.5 mpg best ever on an all highway trip and maybe 31 mpg on the low end (towing 17.5 mpg).
Overall all inclusive is 32.5 mpg
In other words the real world MPG on US version Mazda CX-5 2.2D diesel is much better than EPA fuel economy rating like it’s supposed to be. EPA Fuel Economy Ratings for 2019 Mazds CX-5 2.2L diesel: 28 city / 31 hwy / 29 MPG combined. I wonder how did Mazda North American Operations screw up the EPA fuel economy testing and got such poor ratings?