blink_me192
Member
However, the 2nd row of CX9 has too much knee room if you push the seat all the way back. With this, the 3rd knee room is very limited.
You should adjust the 2nd row knee room comparable to Highlander, than compare the 3rd knee room. Then, you will see that CX9
actually have more knee room at 3rd row.
We only ocassionally use the 3rd row, so most of the times, the 2nd row seats are pushed all the way back. I guess im just so used to the CX9's size now, but everytime someone gets a ride with us, they always mention how much space is in the 2nd row.
ANd i agree with what you've said. Moving the 2nd row forward makes the 3rd row MUCH more enjoyable. Im not that tall so knee room in the 3rd row even with the 2nd row all the way back isn't really a problem. its just theres not much room to put your feet For some reason, i actually think apart from the drivers seat, the 3rd row is more comfortable than the 2nd.
Although the Kluger/Highlander is much smaller in everyway, the interior seems to be bigger or have a 'roomier' feel. I've come to the conclusion that its this way because:
1) the kluger doesn't have the high centre console that the CX9 has, and feels far less sporty and has less of a cockpit feel. Actually having driven the cx9, i really like the cossetting cockpit feel, and whenever i drive a car with a more open plan layout, i feel a bit strange. A bit like im driving a bus or something.
2) the CX9 has MUCH thicker doors. if you take a cross section of the CX9 doors, its looks like from one side to the other, its almost about 20-25cm thick!! The kluger has much flatter doors, which i guess gives the impression of more interior room.
3) the cx9s DLO area is more slanted inwards than the boxy Kluger.