JonBenet Ramsey killer admits 10 years later

Vacationed in Thailand a couple times when I lived in Japan. Cheap and easy travelling there. But nothing worse than seeing some kraut ride around with a little girl on the back of his moped. Not saying it's just krauts. Japanese businessmen are culprits too... though I never saw any. I guess they're more "discrete". And of course there are some Americans and other Euro-pervs. Wanted to kill those fuckers. You want the Thai government to crack down on these *****. However the Thai government does allow some OK things.... like arming teachers to prevent massacres by the Islamo-thugs in the south.

Yeah, the world is ****** up. Otherwise, cheap awesome food, killer beaches, cheap beer, and drugs if you wish...... and yeah stupid travel chicks, legal ones.

So her family officially didnt do it..... although putting your kid in a beauty pageant is sick in itself..... so is OJ now innocent too? I don't think so.
 
Last edited:
the man didn't do it. His ex-wife who really has no reason to lie for him said that he was with her the whole time during the christmas holidays. Chances are he got in trouble in Thailand on kiddy porn charges and also he has a book coming out I believe. Where would you rather go to jail the brutal Thai jails or the cushy (by comparison) American jails. The guy also says he drugged Jean Bennett while her autopsy show so signs of being drugged. Last but not least he's confessing to all this stuff without a lawyer present and he refuses to state how he killed her.

In the end though they have the killers DNA so it's only a matter of time before this is solved. Something is fishy about this dude. But if I turn out to be wrong and he DID do it, I'll return to eat my crow (Note the the chef: I like mine well done)
 
Donas64 said:
Something is fishy about this dude. But if I turn out to be wrong and he DID do it, I'll return to eat my crow (Note the the chef: I like mine well done)

I agree...even though he confessed, some things still sound fishy.
 
This arrest doesn't answer any of the questions asked when the Ramsey's refused to talk to cops in the first place.

Listen to the way he talks...He says he was with her when she died. No one talks like that when they kill someone. He says it was accidental and unintended, yet he cautiously cleaned everything. Not bloody likely.

Put this guy in Colorado...He has no ties to Colorado, little alone Boulder. He has no ties to the Ramsey's what-so-ever.

Put this guy in the house...A total stranger, knows where everything is in the house (the flashlight to cave in the back of her skull, a change of clothes, the seemingly hidden room in the basement), and accidentally kills the girl. Then cleans everything up, changes the girls clothes and leaves her in a room that no one in the house except for family memebrs know about. Then leaves through a tiny window covered by a rusted metal grate, that Jean can barely squeeze out, leaving one left foot print outside. There is litterally NO other evidence inside the house except a hand print (which is unidentified) and DNA under the girls fingernails.

To top it all off, the CU professor is the one who turned this dude over. The CU prof is shopping a book deal right now about the case (again), and always has been a staunch supporter of the Ramsey's innocense. He has everything to gain from the publicity.

I'm no genius, but I am a thinker. This arrest doesn't solve anything. It only brings up a ton of questions that shouldn't be asked if you have a solid suspect, which is what is claimed. The only way this guy will be found guilty is if the crappy DNA found under Jean's finger nails matches...My money is it doesn't. The DNA evidence found under her nails has been processed already with no match because it is full of all kinds of crap. Its not even a clean sample of one person's DNA.

My money is still on the mother killing the daughter. The family acted strange from day one, and never cleared up anything to make themselves innocent.
 
SilverBulletES said:
...(snip)

So her family officially didnt do it..... although putting your kid in a beauty pageant is sick in itself..... so is OJ now innocent too? I don't think so.

Her family was and is still not innocent. This arrest doesn't prove anything.
 
StuttersC said:
Her family was and is still not innocent. This arrest doesn't prove anything.

uuummmm...I believe there is also something about linking him to a Boot print found at the scene?
 
Earful said:
uuummmm...I believe there is also something about linking him to a Boot print found at the scene?

i believe he was also a neighbor of the ramseys when they lived in GA.
 
ya if you watched the interview he did it didnt seem like he knew what was going on!! imho he is a nut who got too involved in writing a book about the case and now he believes he did it! he did not give any new info and only said what was on the police reports! which he got wrong!! their was no edvidence of her being drugged and raped! plus how he said he got into the apt had untouched cob webbs when the police arrived!! so for now i still believe the case is unsolved!!

rob
 
from what i heard from, a forensic investigator, it looks like patsy probably was behind it or did it...
 
i think the mom had something to do with it. not that this guy is innocent, he very well may have killed her, but something about that mom gave me the creeps. maybe it was because she was a pageant mom.
 
Back