Years ago I'd say avoid 10W50, any brand. Reason being that multi-viscosity is achieved by the inclusion of viscosity improvers, VIs, which don't themselves provide lubricity, plus worse yet can gum under heat & time. One is polyisobutylene, which was popularized in basically pure form in the 70s as "STP". Same theory would hold today, just far less. So a 10W30 would BE A LITTLE BETTER than a 5W30 in this respect (i.e. closer to a straight weight). But we still know which tends to give better cold weather starts and gas mileage. There's no free lunch. Synthetics give you a consistent molecular size versus mineral oil. THERE JUST ISN'T ANY DOUBT that they provide a longer life, since the light stuff in mineral oil tends to boil off while the heavy molecules glop together and tend toward sludging. But synthetics cost more ... no free lunch again. When synthetics first came out, there were reports of engine seal leaks, typically after switching back to mineral oil. Theory was that the seals swelled more with the synthetics and when the swelling "went down" with mineral oil, they leaked. But this is apparently a relic of the past - not sure if it was oil additives and/or better seal composition. However, I still think it's maybe worth STICKING WITH ONE OR THE OTHER so you don't tempt fate on this one. For same type reason, sticking with a brand makes some sense (not that I follow this if there's a good sale(sssh) )