Ya - the problem in the automotive industry is that there is no standardization in ADAS (Advanced Driver Assistance Systems) naming. Speaking of "Lane Keeping" - there are now 3 different types of systems available...
1. The old passive systems - detect lanes and warn you (only) when you drift outside of them, with no corrective steering torque being applied by the system.
2. The more recent *active* systems - detect lanes and attempt to correct you if you drift out of your lane. These systems do not try to "auto-steer" for you - but only try to correct your path by applying corrective torque if you drift into the lane markings. Often they tend to ping-pong you back and forth inside the lane.
(In the case of Mazda (the "Driver's Car"), Mazda tries to keep its LKA system "non-intrusive" (so it doesn't risk losing its "Driver" fans, who tend to want to be in charge of the "driving" and steering). The result with Mazda is you must steer all of the time - and as long as you stay more or less centered, the Mazda system will never interfere by applying any corrective torque. This is clearly their design intent. Unfortunately for Mazda, most other auto manufacturers have moved forward and also offer a newer *auto-steering" type of active Lane Keeping as described next).
3. The newest systems * (Lane Centering), detect lanes and attempt to completely *auto-steer* for you, keeping you centered between the lane markers. (Like Tesla Auto Pilot and Cadillac Super Cruise). These systems do not wait until you drift out of the lane, but apply steering torque continuously to keep you centered in the lane.
Unfortunately for we consumers, it is almost impossible to tell which type of *Lane Keeping Assist* a given vehicle has without actually driving and testing it yourself. And more discouraging, many auto journalists (and Youtube reviewers), don*t offer any detailed help, they simply report that a given vehicle has *Lane Keeping" and other safety assists.
What drives me crazy is listening to some of these so-called auto- journalists complaining that the Lane Keeping is *too intrusive*, when in fact (if it is really a Lane Centering system), of course it is intrusive, that*s what it is designed to do, steer for you! Duh! It's as if most auto- journalists are still unaware of the growing importance of these Driver Assist Systems, and are still locked into only testing zero to sixty and other ancient behaviors.