It seems to be more of a warning system than steering correction. The steering correction is very modest. But after driving the CRV for a day, it's probably in keeping with Mazda`s driving philosophy. The CRV kept tugging at the wheel through turns and if you made a quick lane change without the blinker (a necessity sometimes in aggressive traffic). For cruising on an open highway the CRV's more pronounced correction was OK but in traffic and tighter curves it was irritating. Mazda seems more inclined to leave control to the driver.
It seems to be more of a warning system than steering correction. The steering correction is very modest. But after driving the CRV for a day, it's probably in keeping with Mazda`s driving philosophy. The CRV kept tugging at the wheel through turns and if you made a quick lane change without the blinker (a necessity sometimes in aggressive traffic). For cruising on an open highway the CRV's more pronounced correction was OK but in traffic and tighter curves it was irritating. Mazda seems more inclined to leave control to the driver.
It's almost not noticeable on the CX-5. On my Mazda6 it really fights you to stay in the lane. It's not a big deal to me, but I think I prefer the CX-5 small nudge to the Mazda6 pull.
It's almost not noticeable on the CX-5. On my Mazda6 it really fights you to stay in the lane. It's not a big deal to me, but I think I prefer the CX-5 small nudge to the Mazda6 pull.
What I find the most odd is the stronger nudge when the system 'loses' one or both lane borders. Anyone else note that?
If I needed to send a text message using two hands, would the lane keep assist and adaptive cruise control be able to safely keep me in my lane on the highway?
If I needed to send a text message using two hands, would the lane keep assist and adaptive cruise control be able to safely keep me in my lane on the highway?
If I needed to send a text message using two hands, would the lane keep assist and adaptive cruise control be able to safely keep me in my lane on the highway?