Two things holding me back
- Thread starter rochrunner
- Start date
- :
- Denver, CO
Sounds like you are on the right track. I'm totally objective because we have an Audi A4 and an Infiniti G37 Convertible, and we are trading the G37 for something with more utility. I recently leased a '16 Accord for my cousin and had a great sales experience, so it would be natural for us to go back to the same dealer for a CR-V. But, the CR-V feels like a step below the CX-5 IMO both inside and outside, and the CX-5 is a step above the G37 in fit/finish and comes close to the Audi. And I can't believe how quiet it is. I guess the fact that it looks and drives more Audi-like is what drew me to the CX-5. We will be getting it this week.
True, the Accord does have Apple and Android Carplay, but that isn't a deciding feature for me.
Last edited:
I currently own a 2013 RDX and the CX-5 is definitely on the same level of niceness on the interior.
I'm being objective as well I believe because even tho I owned a twin turbo RX7 and currently a Mazda3 I have also owned a 96 Accord, a 94 Eclipse, a 03 Acura CL-S, a 99 Toyota Soarer, and a 00 Audi S4. (no american cars tho)
- :
- Plano, Texas, USA
I've been saying the same thing that offering Mazda's excellent SA-D diesel engine for US market at this time is 4 years too late! Timing is important. This's not a right time for diesel engines, not to mention the added maintenance overhead、higher diesel fuel price in many areas、and about $2,800 price tag on a new diesel CX-5. It's going to be a tough sell!
I agree the diesel would have had a bigger impact if it was introduced before the VW scandal. But I still want one. I would take the 2.5T from the CX-9 if they offered it, but I still have a slight preference for the diesel. I'm surprised at the lack of enthusiasm on this forum, and in general the outdated views people have about diesels.
NelsonLewis
Banned
- :
- 16.5 CX-5 GT AWD w/Tech BRMica
Outdated views. Lol far from it. My view on diesel has nothing to do with the tarnished image created by VW.
NelsonLewis
Banned
- :
- 16.5 CX-5 GT AWD w/Tech BRMica
What about em? They're great! Best thing since sliced bread...
And boy do I know how to tune them...
NelsonLewis
Banned
- :
- 16.5 CX-5 GT AWD w/Tech BRMica
A lot of people don't understand turbos either. Oh yea, that's also what gives the diesel it's power and fuel efficiency. Imagine that...
- :
- Denver, CO
I don't know anything about turbos and have never driven them.
I guess I can say the same for diesel.
I guess I can say the same for diesel.
NelsonLewis
Banned
- :
- 16.5 CX-5 GT AWD w/Tech BRMica
Turbos are like AWD to me, once you have it, you always want it.
By "outdated" I'm referring to the old conventional wisdom that diesels are stinky, smoky, clattery, hard starting, and slow revving. I think that's because most Americans' only experiences with diesel are with the old large displacement truck engines. Among modern small displacement diesels, the only one I've driven that exhibited any of those characteristics was a BMW 118d which was a bit clattery and slow revving with a lot of flywheel.
The 2.5T would be fine with me as well.
The 2.5T would be fine with me as well.
So you want Android Auto right now + a SUV which does not look like nor resemble anything in terms of driving and design as with your Mazda3? Well then get the CRV as with many other cars meets both criteria.
That said why haven't you gotten the CRV? What are the things regarding the CRV holding you back?
On Diesel - I have been a critic.
This past weekend drove to a state park nearby and purposely took inner roads - Farm to Market types
On this one road- up and down there was a truck behind me. I would lose it when going downhill and it would catch up going uphill easily.
So really hilly terrain owners might looking for Diesels because Torque = will find diesel good. But I dont know if there are too many Mazda dealerships in rural America. Whenever I drive my CX-5 to inner parts I stick like a sore thumb.
I do see the odd hyundai / BMW etc. But these folks never seen a Mazda it seems.
If you really live in the hill country - you will appreciate the diesel for better FE and the torque. But there are not many dealers unless you are near Colo Springs or Denver etc.
This past weekend drove to a state park nearby and purposely took inner roads - Farm to Market types
On this one road- up and down there was a truck behind me. I would lose it when going downhill and it would catch up going uphill easily.
So really hilly terrain owners might looking for Diesels because Torque = will find diesel good. But I dont know if there are too many Mazda dealerships in rural America. Whenever I drive my CX-5 to inner parts I stick like a sore thumb.
I do see the odd hyundai / BMW etc. But these folks never seen a Mazda it seems.
If you really live in the hill country - you will appreciate the diesel for better FE and the torque. But there are not many dealers unless you are near Colo Springs or Denver etc.
He has a thread in the CRV forums - "Forty Two things holding me back." - I suggest you read that.
- :
- 2014 QX70 AWD
It does seem that some folks think we can't be objective simply because we already own a Mazda. Never mind we've most likely had numerous different makes/models during our lifetimes.
Then, to come onto a Mazda forum, ask for advice, and then nullify it because it cannot be objective due to owner bias?
(crazy)
