- :
- RDX Aspec Adv.
Why its speed limited so of limited value and not suitable on most roads.
30mph is far faster than I go up my drive-way.
Why its speed limited so of limited value and not suitable on most roads.
There's your answer, unob. What's the one common factor with all of those cars that have had major problems by 120k?
You, bro.
Yep. I’d have to think someone is driving vehicles beyond their limits if they cannot get 120k from them.
Is that faster than a Tesla?
So you have a data "set" of 2 and this defines how reliable the entire brand is? Uh, no, not by a long shot. That's like saying "My uncle smoked cigarettes and lived to be 90, so smoking does NOT mean you will shorten your life."
Couldn't tell ya, but it sure sounds a Hell of a lot better.Is that faster than a Tesla?
So I guess I should not share my experience with Toyota. When people ask me what car to buy. I say buy what you want. Not what other people want you to buy. You will not be happy driving someone else's favorite car.
Not sure how you can say that.
US News:
"When it comes to handling, the CX-5 will take the Pepsi challenge against any compact SUV. This Mazda has accurate steering and is one of the most agile SUVs in any class, making it incredibly engaging to drive."
Car & Driver:
"Mazda blends sports-car know-how into every model, and the 10Best-winning CX-5 is no exception. Sharp steering and a poised chassis make it an enthusiast’s pick"
Edmunds:
"Simply a crisper and more satisfying crossover to drive than rivals such as the Honda CR-V and the Toyota RAV4"
MotorTrend:
"Its handling chops continued to impress where it felt right at home on winding roads and didn’t exhibit much body roll."
Autoweek:
"Mazda's CX-5 may mimic the enormous population of small crossovers on sale today, but from behind the wheel the brand's trademark friskiness is immediately noticeable. It's great for the driving enthusiasts among us"
Look... I'm not even saying it's true, but to say Mazda has no 'niche'?!? I think you're mistaken.
Good point, however I just believe the RAV4 will get a significant change in terms of its handling once we start seeing the reviews come in. I doubt they're not going to significantly improve the handling of the RAV4 considering they are likely going to give it a significant increase in power(at least by CUV standard) and give it a much better transmission than the outgoing model.
To me, I like the latter on Toyota's new Dynamic Torque Vectoring AWD with Rear Driveline Disconnect.and real torque vectoring, etc.Good point, however I just believe the RAV4 will get a significant change in terms of its handling once we start seeing the reviews come in. I doubt they're not going to significantly improve the handling of the RAV4 considering they are likely going to give it a significant increase in power(at least by CUV standard) and give it a much better transmission than the outgoing model.
The second gen Cx5 has real torque vectoringand real torque vectoring, etc.
To me, I like the latter on Toyota's new Dynamic Torque Vectoring AWD with Rear Driveline Disconnect.
The second gen Cx5 has real torque vectoring
Use common sense making judgement. I've been experiencing long rear drive shaft vibration issues since my 1987 VW Vanagon Syncro days. Why we keep that long and heavy drive shaft to rear differential turning all the time even if we don't need it? Adding a couple of clutches controlling rear drive shaft is not problematic to me like adding spark-plug ignition mixing with compression ignition and a super charger like Mazda did to SPCCI.Wtf Fanboi!?! Have you driven it yet? What if it sucks? I love how you assume it's going to be AWESOME. You're a Toyoptimist, aren't you? Just made that up. It's good right? Bwahahahaha
The Stelvio is pushing $85,000 so it's not cheap. Also, the reliability of Alfa Romeo is not the greatest. C&D tested a Stelvio and the moonroof motor busted and wouldn't close. Alfa is owned by Fiat and Fiat is not known for long term reliability.
The Stelvio is a nice vehicle and fast but inexpensive and reliable, it is not.