We're looking at buying a CX-9 Touring model and were going to go with the 2010 to get a better deal (~$1500), but the 2011 is rated 17/24mpg while the 2010 gets 16/22mpg. Is this a matter of the EPA test procedure changing or is there really a difference in the control module or something that accounts for a real improvement, small though it is? Thanks!
Gas Milage difference between 2010 and 2011 Touring models?
- Thread starter sprinkle
- Start date
not_too_shabby
Member
- :
- 2008 CX-9
I would go with the 2011. The price difference is small enough considering you are going up one model year which will have improved resale/ trade-in value 4 years down the road.
This happened with the similar engines Ford has in its vehicles (like the Edge). I don't believe EPA changed their testing guidelines, but I'm not really sure what Ford/Mazda did to get the better fuel mileage on the newer models. If you plan on keeping the car for at least 5 + years, then go with the 2010, if you are one that trades in often, then get the 2011.
Forget about MPG
No doubt you've made your decision by now (2 1/2 months later), but for general information, don't worry about the mileage -- you'll never consistently see the top numbers, anyway.
Since fuel economy is one of the 9's few weak spots (albeit a big one as gas heads up $4), better to decide on other factors, such as the price difference you mentioned.
No doubt you've made your decision by now (2 1/2 months later), but for general information, don't worry about the mileage -- you'll never consistently see the top numbers, anyway.
Since fuel economy is one of the 9's few weak spots (albeit a big one as gas heads up $4), better to decide on other factors, such as the price difference you mentioned.
