Finally Dynoed My MSP

M

MSP4G63

Member

:

2003 Black Mazdaspeed Protege

• Oct 28, 2008

• #1

Well after owning my MSP for over 18 months and spending over $5000 on fixing it and puting parts on it because the previous owner didnt take care of it I finally dynoed the beast and here's how it did:
MODS: Injen Cold Air Intake, 2.5 inch J-Pipe, 3 inch High Flow Cat, 3 inch Straight Pipe, Fidanza 7lb. Flywheel, Exedy Stage 1 Clutch, Magnecore 8.5mm Wires, AWR 95 Durometer Solid Motor Mounts, Turbolife Front Mount Intercooler, ATP Wastegate Actuator, Stock ECU.

VIDEO IS HERE!

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/KDm95MXfd0s&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/KDm95MXfd0s&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

 

Last edited: Oct 29, 2008

J

JCell

BEETEK!

:

2014 Genesis Coupe R-Spec

• Oct 28, 2008

• #2

im sorry, but does that say u have 584 torque?

 

M

MSP4G63

Member

:

2003 Black Mazdaspeed Protege

• Oct 28, 2008

• #3

lol yea the dyno had a hicup but all the runs produced the same torque curve they printed this one because it had the highest horsepower but the torque graph was messed up only on that one part.

 

S

shane02pro5

25ish_psi

:

New Caney TX

• Oct 28, 2008

• #4

Good numbers...torque looks a bit high

 

C

CHICO2003

:

MSP & MS3

• Oct 28, 2008

• #5

How's the torque steer?

191hp for the mods you have is pretty damn good. You sure you didn't up the boost?

 

R

Ricktalife

Member

:

2012 Subaru WRX

• Oct 28, 2008

• #6

sweet yo. i guess i should expect close to the same numbers once i get my vibrant and customMSP smic.

 

J

justinlansdale

Member

:

2003.5 Mazdaspeed Protege

• Oct 29, 2008

• #7

more proof that the turbolife FMIC is MAGIC. seriously! awesome numbers!

 

M

MSP4G63

Member

:

2003 Black Mazdaspeed Protege

• Oct 29, 2008

• #8

No I didnt up the boost its just got the atp wastegate, torque steers a b**** I crab walked across 2 lanes once, spins 'em all the way through 4th if its wet lol.

 

R

Ricktalife

Member

:

2012 Subaru WRX

• Oct 29, 2008

• #9

dayum

 

T

theEZV

Member

:

2003.5 MSP --> 2013 WRX --> 2014 335i

• Oct 29, 2008

• #10

good numbers. turbolife ftw!!!

 

F

ForceFed

Member

:

Trailblazer SS AWD ....Still a Mazda Junkie Though.

• Oct 29, 2008

• #11

LOL@584ft/lbs.!!!

 

C

CHICO2003

:

MSP & MS3

• Oct 29, 2008

• #12

Correct me if I'm wrong but... if you're not boostin upwards of 10+ isn't a FMIC overkill? I've got a custom msp SMIC and considered a FMIC but came to the conclusion that, while they look cool, it was a waste for my needs. (I'm still at stock boost levels) So I guess what I'm really wondering is... would my SMIC produce similar results or is the FMIC as badass as it looks?

 

C

CHICO2003

:

MSP & MS3

• Oct 29, 2008

• #13

btw... how much was the dyno? Now I'm curious...

 

S

Sveivo

Member

:

2002 Protege5

• Oct 29, 2008

• #14

Flat torque graph FTW.

 

K

Knox Joe

Member

Contributor

:

Ti MSP

• Oct 29, 2008

• #15

CHICO2003 said:

Correct me if I'm wrong but... if you're not boostin upwards of 10+ isn't a FMIC overkill? I've got a custom msp SMIC and considered a FMIC but came to the conclusion that, while they look cool, it was a waste for my needs. (I'm still at stock boost levels) So I guess what I'm really wondering is... would my SMIC produce similar results or is the FMIC as badass as it looks?

Click to expand...

The FMIC will outperform the SMIC, and I've been trying to tell people this for a few years now on this board, but everyone argues with me, telling me that "below 10psi all you need is a SMIC." (screwy)

Cooler charges are cooler charges.

And with the proper sized charge piping, and core, you will not notice any lag.

 

B

BOOSTR

1 OWNR MSP

• Oct 29, 2008

• #16

I'd like to see this session using RPM and with a HP/TQ combo graph layout. That TQ plot is BS.

 

T

turbolife

Member

:

2003.5 Mazdaspeed Protege

• Oct 29, 2008

• #17

Good numbers!

 

2

2.0t03speed

Member

:

08.5 CWP Speed 3

• Oct 29, 2008

• #18

BOOSTR said:

I'd like to see this session using RPM and with a HP/TQ combo graph layout. That TQ plot is BS.

Click to expand...

it was proabably having tach signal issues or something

 

B

BOOSTR

1 OWNR MSP

• Oct 29, 2008

• #19

Perhaps...I just like to see the curves intersect at 5250 rpm. HP delivery looked good though just like on justinfrom lansdale's chart.

 

1

1moreMPH

Member

:

03.5 Speed sunsilver

• Oct 29, 2008

• #20

great hp curve, nice and steady with 191 max is real nice. that tq graph has to be wrong all the way through... no way are you that close to 250 lol. bragging rights though? haha