Well...they designed all SkyActiv engines to run on 87. Turbo benefits from 93 (though that has been debated on here), but is not a requirement.
I do agree though, documentation could use work and better precision.
As for oil, just ensure that whatever you use is full synthetic! Yrwei just called that out because the NA engine calls for 0w20 which is only available as a full synthetic in that grade vs 5w30 which can be conventional, full synthetic, etc. For SkyActiv engines, you'll be wanting the full synthetic
Thanks for that.
So is there anywhere in Mazda literature I can find that reference to synthetic and to other such info? Man, if the "gotta fill the filter with oil" statement didn't scare me into having the dealer do routine maintenance, this kind of genuinely undocumented stuff will. I now have no confidence I'm not doing something bad. What else don't I know?
Regarding the octane issue...
When I was picking up my car and taking the inspection drive, the sales guy said that I could get another 23HP by using 93 octane. I did not debate it, but many people think that using a higher octane provides benefits. I've never bought into that thinking, because once the ignition point is high enough to avoid ping, there is no benefit to increasing the fuel's ignition point further. It actually burns slower. I had read much of the online manual and Mazda stuff already and had not come across this piece of information, so thought the sales guy was just making idle chit chat.
But the Mazda CX-5 brochure and the Mazda CX-5 Spec Sheet on their website both state this for the turbo:
250 hp @ 5,000 rpm (with 93 octane fuel)
227 hp @ 5,000 rpm (with 87 octane fuel)
I would assume that the turbo engine detects the fuel ignition temperature (or maybe burn duration) and adjusts the timing accordingly (advances it?).
There is no such octane/hp statement for the naturally aspirated engine, just a much lower 187 hp @ 6,000 rpm, even though the compression ratio for the NA is significantly higher than for the turbo (13.0:1 vs 10.5:1).
As an aside, I was reading an article the other day on using higher-than-required octane, and the author put a car on a dynamometer. The measured HP actually went down when using higher octane fuel (he tested 87/89/91) as engine running temps increased. There were caveats to his conclusions, but it makes for interesting reading.
https://nasaspeed.news/tech/engine/...-the-debate-over-which-fuel-makes-more-power/