- :
- Soon to be 2.5T CX-5
Honestly, that's within aftermarket realm currently.
With ease. Let's do it!
Honestly, that's within aftermarket realm currently.
With ease. Let's do it!
Nah. Not for me. If I wanted a faster vehicle I'd have bought one, and all the foibles that would accompany it. I've always held the motto for me personally, that if it's not good enough from the factory, minus tint, and maybe exhaust, then you bought the wrong one.
I meant Mazda do it, so we can have a warranty to boot.
I get 50 at a steady 75. Corrected to US gallons that*s 42.
Which is a good 8 MPG higher than what the tests I've seen on the US version report. At 42, that would be an MPG win for sure. At 34, less so considering diesel is more expensive and the $4k price premium over the turbo version.
Idk about that. I can go on the mirage forum and find mpgs ranging from 35 to literally 50+. It all depends on how your drive and where you live..The test shown in this thread displayed 34mpg, which is in NO WAY NEAR 50mpg, so unless the test is totally wrong, or he is lying to us, neither of which I suspect, then yeah, the US Diesel is probably very different from his.
Idk about that. I can go on the mirage forum and find mpgs ranging from 35 to literally 50+. It all depends on how your drive and where you live..
Looks to me that Mazda has been living in the past. They publicly admitted that they think that ICE has some life in it. Sigar butt, as Buffet likes to describe something that has one or two puffs in it... Perhaps, Toyota electric technology will revive their leading-edge motto, but at this point I don't see anything happening. Diesel offering will be a total disaster in North America in this day and age...
Well, here's a weekend of my daily commute:
Over 16k miles!!! How many months have you had it now?
I ain't seen nuthin' over 24 except for one tank (24.3).
I gotta get out and take a highway-speed road trip. School's back in. Maybe I'll go to the beach.
The test shown in this thread displayed 34mpg, which is in NO WAY NEAR 50mpg, so unless the test is totally wrong, or he is lying to us, neither of which I suspect, then yeah, the US Diesel is probably very different from his.
You*d make a good tabloid journalist Unob. I said it was 42 corrected to US gallons - our gallons are bigger than yours. I saw your daily commute figures which are similar to mine (when corrected). My commute is about 8 miles of very steep hills, 8 miles of motorway and 8 miles of city. I drive quite hard but not flat out and mine is an AWD auto. How does that compare to your commute?
What we need on here is somebody with one of these diesels because apart from a few initial test reports that I never find accurate (they seem to go off trip computer mileage) we are talking conjecture and speculation.
What we need on here is somebody with one of these diesels because apart from a few initial test reports that I never find accurate (they seem to go off trip computer mileage) we are talking conjecture and speculation.
From what I've heard and seen, trip computer has been within acceptable margin of hand calculated MPG.