Hello,
Current owner of a 2016 CX-5, but my lease is up soon. Have my eye on the turbo, and wanted to see if owners think it*s worth the upgrade over the standard NA engine.
- How does the turbo cruise and pass on the highway around 75-80 mph compared to the NA engine? I*ve always thought my CX-5 feels short of power there, where as my old Volvo turbo could pass with ease. I*ve test driven the turbo but didn*t have the chance to cruise at high speed (thanks DC Beltway)
- What kind of mileage are you getting, both on the highway and around town? On the highway, my 2016 will hit the EPA rating (32 mpg, it*s FWD) only if I stay under 65 mph, feather the throttle, and keep the AC off. Drive above 75 mph at all, or pass a few times, and the car will quickly drop to around 28 mpg, but I*m convinced it*s because I have to draw so deep into the power reserve
reciated. I*m going to trade in next week. Thanks!
Nice cruising and plenty of power for passing and climbing hills (No Georgia). Really feels more to me like a V-6 then a turbo 4 and thats just fine.
87 octane - about 22.5 MPG averaging but i drive fast. I've tried a couple tanks of 91 octane but I dont feel much difference in performance - may give it another try sometime but 87 does the job for me.
I traded in my 2016 CX-5 and it always seemed a bit underpowered at times - no more!
Worth the upgrade for me
Last edited: