mazdadude
ZOOOOOOOOOM ZOOOOOOOOOM
- :
- '16.5 Mazda CX-5 Touring
Dave Coleman is so damn cool !
Dave Coleman makes me want to be a better man...
Dave Coleman is so damn cool !
I have posted them every time this question gets answered incorrectly here. I on the other hand, I believe the data, the dyno, the science, and Dave Coleman.
I can post live data from the obdii on 91, but someone has to post data from 87 and we can compare how far the advance can go on each.
I have posted them every time this question gets answered incorrectly here. I on the other hand, I believe the data, the dyno, the science, and Dave Coleman.
I can post live data from the obdii on 91, but someone has to post data from 87 and we can compare how far the advance can go on each.
And identical vehicle. Each engine will have different performance from factory. If the dyno testing with different gasoline grades on the same CX-5 under the same environment, the increase of several hps still cant prove Mazda did something such as advancing the timing to higher octane gas. It can be other causes or within performance variance for each dyno testing.It would have to be with identical weather conditions.
Please post them again since it's almost universally believed that timing will retard but not advance in response to octane rating and knocking.
Many of us haven't seen your posts, and others may have forgotten.
Even just links. Would it kill ya to do it again?
Not trouble at all. Here is one of the last ones.
http://news.aaa-calif.com/internal_...46/files/20168/Premium-Fuel-REPORT-FINAL2.pdf
http://news.aaa-calif.com/internal_redirect/cms.ipressroom.com.s3.amazonaws.com/46/files/20168/Premium-Fuel-REPORT-FINAL2.pdf
Somewhere else there are more dynocharts that show the diff between grades, I am looking...(confused)
Thanks for that. All it seems to say is that there is no advantage in any respect to using premium when it's designed for regular, but most of us agree on that.
Looking forward to anything else.
Yeah, 3-hp increase, from 126.xx hp to 129.xx hp (2.36% gain) on dyno test for maximum horsepower with premium gas is insignificant to say the best. Use 87-octane ethanol-free gas may have more gain on horsepower than this.Thanks for that. All it seems to say is that there is no advantage in any respect to using premium when it's designed for regular, but most of us agree on that.
Looking forward to anything else.
...
The same Mazda motors are rated at different HP ratings all over the world due to variances in fuel quality available.
That report I posted has the dyno charts and the 3 horsepower gain for the Mazda skyactiv 2.0 motor in it the Mazda motor was one of the only ones to notice a gain.
The same Mazda motors are rated at different HP ratings all over the world due to variances in fuel quality available.
Did I mention that the maximum horsepower is 155 hp on SkyActiv-G 2.0L based on Mazda's specification?