I think the easiest way would be to search used vehicles at a site like www.Edmunds.com. Type in the used manufacture and model and write down the information for that year. Repeat for all years your interested in. ED
Unless I'm mistaken, you're asking about the Signature and Reserve trimmed CX-5's over the past 3 years? Since 2019 is the first year for those two, there's nothing to compare them to.
Huh - I didn't know tht (nor did a salesperson)
So, what is on those two levels of the 2019 MY vs. the top trim levels for '18 and '17 ?
I thought that was what he was asking when he refereed to those years. See my comment above to get the answer. Ed
Huh - I didn't know tht (nor did a salesperson)
So, what is on those two levels of the 2019 MY vs. the top trim levels for '18 and '17 ?
Huh - I didn't know tht (nor did a salesperson)
So, what is on those two levels of the 2019 MY vs. the top trim levels for '18 and '17 ?
2017 is the best of the NA cars..
No thanks.
Its slower than the gen 1s, but man, the quality increase and interior sound deadening makes it hard to recommend a gen 1. Also, my gen 1 got horrible gas mileage.
So much slower...haha
https://www.zeroto60times.com/vehicle-make/mazda-0-60-mph-times/
MAZDA CX-5 0 TO 60 MPH AND QUARTER MILE TIMES
2013 Mazda CX-5 Sport 2.5L Compare 0-60 mph 7.9 | Quarter mile 15.9
2014 Mazda CX-5 Grand Touring 2.5L Compare 0-60 mph 7.6 | Quarter mile 15.8
2016 Mazda CX-5 Grand Touring AWD Compare 0-60 mph 7.7 | Quarter mile 16.0
2017 Mazda CX-5 Grand Touring Compare 0-60 mph 7.8 | Quarter mile 16.2
2018 Mazda CX-5 2.5T Signature AWD Compare 0-60 mph 6.3 | Quarter mile 14.8
Not sure why they skipped the '15, maybe that's the top secret sub 4 second 0-60 everyone keeps talking about.
2017 is the best of the NA cars. 2019 is the turbo model availability. 2018 got folding mirrors (yay) and DoD (seems Mazda did a bad job).