Unlocked ALL the horsepowers!
Teaching the kid proper washing technique.
I see last week you taught him how to hold an AK47, this week its how to wash a car. You sir get my vote of approval.
Then you and others need to pick up the phone and call Mazda until they provide an answer. They WILL get tired of people calling about it at some point.
Unlocked ALL the horsepowers!
So you got an ecu tune? (bow)
why would a potential buyer need to call Mazda? If a potential buyer thinks there is an issue, they will simply eliminate Mazda from their list. I live in the Northeast and was considering a Reserve, getting a little spooked now.
That's likely what most people would do, if they could afford to increase their budget. Right now, to get anything "better" than a CX-5, you have to pay at least $8k more. Buyers who can't afford to spend that much more should call Mazda to get answers before settling for something else. Of course, they don't have to, just saying that if they want answers or if they want change, they have to do something about it.
Basically, things don't get better until they're complained about. Mazda (and every other automaker) needs to hear people complain so that they know what to improve.
Even at 8K, you get something that's kindof a wash, IMO
... And in the grand scheme of things, being unable to put down all 310 lb. ft. of torque when it's well below freezing is a pretty small inconvenience.
And assuming that $8K more is buying you an Acura RDX, based on their forums you'd be jumping out of the frying pan and into the fire.
Not only does the RDX entertainment system's boot time make Mazda's look speedy in comparison; it likes to crash, gives contradictory navigation instructions on the center screen vs. in the HUD, and still doesn't support Android Auto. Several owners also report total power loss during highway driving, misbehaving transmissions, AWD failures, a litany of squeaks and rattles after just weeks of ownership, etc.
I had a pleasant albeit short drive in an RDX last week, but I'd have to be out of my mind to buy a vehicle with such a collection of serious complaints, few of which have been addressed in the year that the RDX has been on the market.
Some owners over there say, "Well all forums have people complaining about rare issues," but the largest complaint here about the CX-5 seems to be in this very thread. And in the grand scheme of things, being unable to put down all 310 lb. ft. of torque when it's well below freezing is a pretty small inconvenience.
The misbehaving transmission is the previous gen with the ZF 9 speed. While ZF makes some great transmissions the 9 speed transverse has been a bit of a train wreck.
They are now using an in house 10 speed.
Agree. You don't need to spend 8k more to get something nice. That's BS.Even at 8K, you get something that's kindof a wash, IMO
Agree. A top of the line RAV4 looks pretty good toost buyers.
If MPG is your primary consideration, sure. From what I've read the Toyota still has an awful ride.The rav4 hybrid offers legit benefits though. Decent performance (similar to a non turbo cx5, hair faster), while having an epa rating of 41mpg city, 38 highway.
It was pretty hard for me to turn away from that. The 0-60 disparity of 1-1.25 seconds is honestly what did it, but Id have a hard time buying a nonturbo cx5 over that hybrid. Thats almost 2x better mpg than my last cx5 got, with better acceleration.
If MPG is your primary consideration, sure. From what I've read the Toyota still has an awful ride.
Like I said...I haven't driven one to comment, but it's very hard to argue 40mpg with similar capabilities of hauling stuff as a cx5, plus toyota reliability. I made my choice, but it wasnt a landslide decision.