If they do this, they might have to change the CX-5 -as they would make them too similar.
https://www.motor1.com/news/265235/next-mazda-cx-3-rumors/
CX-5 would move up size wise getting closer to CX-9.
If they do this, they might have to change the CX-5 -as they would make them too similar.
https://www.motor1.com/news/265235/next-mazda-cx-3-rumors/
CX-5 would move up size wise getting closer to CX-9.
CX-5 would move up size wise getting closer to CX-9.
Hmm, maybe it'll grow an inch or two over time, but nowhere close to encroaching on the CX-9. The article says the next CX-3 would be closer to the Honda C-HR, which is only 171.2"--just 3" longer than the CX-3--and still just a sporty hatchback.
By comparison, the CX-5 and its main competition are 179-180".
The CX-9 is a whopping 199", which is already longer than almost all of its competition, including the Highlander.
Honesty, all they need to do is make the CX-3 back seat similar to the Mazda 3 and it would be good. The rear seats in the CX-3 are absolutely tiny and impossible for anyone over 5'4" to sit in.
So I saw this:
https://www.carscoops.com/2018/09/2020-mazda-cx-3-will-bigger-spacious-practical/
They say the new CX-3 will be built on the Mazda 3 platform and not the Mazda 2 platform. For some reason, I thought the CX-5 was built on the Mazda 3 platform. Does this imply that all the CX cars are going to get bigger?
CX-5 is based on 3 & 6 platforms
Gotcha. So they will all be similar in size?
And with wheels potentially falling off the 3, and 2.5L engines dropping rocker arms, it's gonna get a whole lot worse I'm afraid.