Years ago when I first moved from a car to a RAV4, I thought parking sensors were for people that couldn’t drive. Then I realised that small cars disappeared out of sight when reversing and all of a sudden they made sense. When I first read about RCTA, I thought thats just a gimmick that they have tacked on to the blind spot monitoring because its convenient. Then when I got it and realised that when backing out of some of the parking bays in an underground garage, it could pick out movement that I’d absolutely no chance of seeing - even somebody walking. Now all of a sudden they are making a lot of sense - they are superb.
I guess with all these aids (as they should be considered), as long as they are used with the rest of your senses, eyes, ears and don’t forget that your head still turns, they improve the situation. The same can be said of SCBS but if you start relying on them to take responsibility for proper driving (my pet hate of assing around with mobile phones springs to mind as well as just becoming plain lazy), then you are getting on thin ice. Its why I prefer to call them “aids”.
BTW, when I worked at Ferodo, every now and again, the vehicle manufacturers would call us in for a pep talk on how we must provide a 5 year plan on year on year price decreases for brake pads they had already screwed us to the floor for. They argued that the buyers wanted more and more extras without price increases in order for them to remain competitive. It was nothing to do with them wanting to increase their profits. Nevertheless, the VMs do consider how they will absorb the cost of these extras or in which way they can pass some on (as part of an extras pack). Over here, 360 cameras have been added to Nissan QashQai (pronounced Cashki - your Rogue) and they sell cars like hot cakes. Its a very popular selling toy that hooks buyers like flies to a cow poo.