This is an example of buying an extended warranty based on emotion (fear, concern, anxiety) instead of reason (facts, logic, statistics).
You cited ONE person who had a transmission failure that would have been covered by an extended warranty, as a reason to spend ~$2K on a warranty. In that same thread, it was mentioned that Mazda would cover labor, and a transmission could be purchased for $1000-$1800.
But let's just assume this ONE person would have made out well financially by buying the warranty.
Should that have any influence whatsoever on whether future owners should buy a warranty? Is this relevant at all?
- It looks like Mazda sold around 445,000 CX-5's between 2012 - 2016.
- How many of those had transmission failures between 60,000 and 99,999 miles (which would be covered by an extended warranty)?
I'm guessing you have no clue. But because you react based on emotion, you link to this one poor guy that fits this scenario.
I don't know what the number is either, but I'm guessing it is tiny.
If it is 1 out of every 500, then you have a 0.2% chance of being impacted. If it is 1 out of every 1000, your chance is 0.1%.