- :
- RDX Aspec Adv.
Do you use the parking brake ?
Do you use the parking brake ?
Just found out BHN2-46-100D is not the brake switch but the whole shifter assembly which includes lock solenoid and "Not P position" switch. There's slight chance that the replacement shifter assembly is not working perfectly. Again try the shift override and see if there's any difference on hard shifting.
Honestly I believe your dealer did the right thing at first time by checking the brake switch and replacing the whole shifter assembly. If your problem is still there, you may have to escalate the case to Mazda North American Operations for further assistance.
I hear you and in fact I understand many forum members simply abandoned the ship and didn't even bother to post any comments here for fear of getting flamed. I noticed there're so few active posters here who owns older CX-5's, which is quite different from other car forums I used to be in. Many active posters here 2、3、4 years ago are no longer here. My conclusion is this's also related to Mazda's industry-low customer retention rate. Many people bought a Mazda and they don't buy the second one, due to various reasons but I believe mostly the quality and reliability issues. They left early from this forum because they got rid of the CX-5 early and wouldn't be posting here anymore!⋯ Overall I am still frustrated with all the little things wrong with my vehicle and my patience is wearing thin. Never experienced anything like this before, let alone on a brand new purchase (yeah, its two years old at this point, but a lot of this stuff has been ongoing since the early days of ownership).
I hear you and in fact I understand many forum members simply abandoned the ship and didn't even bother to post any comments here for fear of getting flamed. I noticed there're so few active posters here who owns older CX-5's, which is quite different from other car forums I used to be in. Many active posters here 2、3、4 years ago are no longer here. My conclusion is this's also related to Mazda's industry-low customer retention rate. Many people bought a Mazda and they don't buy the second one, due to various reasons but I believe mostly the quality and reliability issues. They left early from this forum because they got rid of the CX-5 early and wouldn't be posting here anymore!
I fully understand Mazda vehicles are not the most reliable products before I made the decision to get our first Mazda. I also feel Mazda's quality and reliability are hit and miss. Part of reason IMO is they can't have stable suppliers due to they're being small, and they may have to switch suppliers from time to time for cost issue which may introduce a batch of inferior parts eventually causeing problems. So far our 19,229-mile 2016 CX-5 is having minimum issues (knock on wood) but we don't have rust concerns which also affect the rear brakes like yours. And the potential electric parking brake issue discussed in the other thread right now makes me fully aware I eventually need a revised EPB control module at my own expense if I don't get an EPB warning light soon. Those crooked A-pillar trims, misaligned panels, and the big gaps between interior trim pieces, at least they won't affect the functionallity. Also we need to consider the complexity of the modern vehicles. It's hard to make a problem-free automobile nowadays. That's why I'm truely impressed with Toyota who can make the much more complicated hybrid Prius that much reliable!
Yes you really have better memory than mine! My 2016 CX-5 has Jan. 2015 build date. The LED headlights are still fine without mildew (yet) but I really don't know if this's a good thing or not?! (knock on wood again!)I agree. And if my memory serves me correctly we both have Jan 2015 build dates. They probably came off the assembly line at about the same time and most likely share similar vendor sourced parts.
Yes you really have better memory than mine! My 2016 CX-5 has Jan. 2015 build date. The LED headlights are still fine without mildew (yet) but I really don't know if this's a good thing or not?! (knock on wood again!)
Thanks for the tip. I'll try that and see if I can get the mildew going a little faster in my LED headlights. It's sad to say that though ⋯I suppose you could always blast your headlights with a cold hose in the hot sun for several minutes. If you see tons of moisture in there a short time afterwards I'd bet you'd start to see the gasket gasses start the hazing process. When I wash my car now with the replacement headlights I haven't really seen any moisture at all form on the inner lens.
Thanks for the tip. I'll try that and see if I can get the mildew going a little faster in my LED headlights. It's sad to say that though ⋯
Occurs on flat surfaces, even when using parking brake. Grrrr.
GFs CRV can even rock several inchs without experiencing this. (She never uses parking brake).
Mine does do this but only after first starting it up.
I've never had tranny issues on a car.
Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
How long/many miles do you keep em?
I can be sitting stationary with my foot on the brake pedal, and if i move the shifter back and forth between P and D or R the resistance shows itself. Bear in mind this is without taking your foot off the brake.
banjos-n-beer did try a new CX-5 and felt similar resistance. If resistance banjos-n-beer has is always from Park to Reverse or Drive, not between Reverse and Drive, I'd believe it's the shift-lock issue. If he feels the resistance between Reverse and Drive, then it has nothing to do with shift-lock mechanism. banjos-n-beer may need to press the lock-release button on the shift stick fully? In any event there's something wrong if he needs to pump the foot brake a couple of times to shift out of the Park.There are detent springs at the bottom of the shifter. Have you tried another similar vehicle?I can be sitting stationary with my foot on the brake pedal, and if i move the shifter back and forth between P and D or R the resistance shows itself. Bear in mind this is without taking your foot off the brake.
banjos-n-beer did try a new CX-5 and felt similar resistance. If resistance banjos-n-beer has is always from Park to Reverse or Drive, not between Reverse and Drive, I'd believe it's the shift-lock issue. If he feels the resistance between Reverse and Drive, then it has nothing to do with shift-lock mechanism. banjos-n-beer may need to press the lock-release button on the shift stick fully? In any event there's something wrong if he needs to pump the foot brake a couple of times to shift out of the Park.
I hear you and in fact I understand many forum members simply abandoned the ship and didn't even bother to post any comments here for fear of getting flamed. I noticed there're so few active posters here who owns older CX-5's, which is quite different from other car forums I used to be in. Many active posters here 2、3、4 years ago are no longer here. My conclusion is this's also related to Mazda's industry-low customer retention rate. Many people bought a Mazda and they don't buy the second one, due to various reasons but I believe mostly the quality and reliability issues. They left early from this forum because they got rid of the CX-5 early and wouldn't be posting here anymore!
I fully understand Mazda vehicles are not the most reliable products before I made the decision to get our first Mazda. I also feel Mazda's quality and reliability are hit and miss. Part of reason IMO is they can't have stable suppliers due to they're being small, and they may have to switch suppliers from time to time for cost issue which may introduce a batch of inferior parts eventually causeing problems. So far our 19,229-mile 2016 CX-5 is having minimum issues (knock on wood) but we don't have rust concerns which also affect the rear brakes like yours. And the potential electric parking brake issue discussed in the other thread right now makes me fully aware I eventually need a revised EPB control module at my own expense if I don't get an EPB warning light soon. Those crooked A-pillar trims, misaligned panels, and the big gaps between interior trim pieces, at least they won't affect the functionallity. Also we need to consider the complexity of the modern vehicles. It's hard to make a problem-free automobile nowadays. That's why I'm truely impressed with Toyota who can make the much more complicated hybrid Prius that much reliable!
So what is BnB thinking of moving on to?
I don't agree with your generality. My son is driving a 96 Miata I bought new (21 years ago) that runs great. New plugs, battery, tires and a crank positioning sensor is only part failed. My daughter in law is driving an early 2013 CX-5 I bought new that has had no problems. My daughter is driving a early sky 2012 3 that has had no problems that replaced a 2002 Civic that at ten years fell apart - front ball joints, motor support, brake light and the whole dash would sometimes work but usually all gages including speedometer were dead. Mazda reliability has been good for us, knock on wood.