I don't agree with that. The 2017 seems a little more planted while cornering on rough roads that made the 2016.5 feel a little skittish. The steering seems to be tuned slightly better. And then there is G-vectoring.
Do you have a ‘17?
I don't agree with that. The 2017 seems a little more planted while cornering on rough roads that made the 2016.5 feel a little skittish. The steering seems to be tuned slightly better. And then there is G-vectoring.
Do you have a 17?
Yes. Or it's probably more accurate to say my wife does, since she drives it most days.
Yes. Or it's probably more accurate to say my wife does, since she drives it most days.
Good to hear. I cannot say one is better or worse since I’ve only driven the ‘17 I own. One thing is certain, it drives very well in slick conditions. I had to run to Lowe’s for some things. We had our pipes freeze overnight. 5” of snow and ice was no deterrent at all. I never felt any slippage.
AW or snows?
AWD with the OEM Toyo tires.
ah, i was wondering if you had finally bitten the bullet after hearing about your insurance company and your other ride....
It’s a bit melodramatic. It’s a car not a life.Looks like Hyundai will soon be selling the diesel Santa Fe in Canada at least. I fully expect this model to be sold in the US as well as Canada uses EPA and CARB standards whether they admit it or not.
http://driving.ca/hyundai/santa-fe/...hyundai-to-sell-new-diesel-santa-fe-in-canada
Today there are 2.x L turbo diesel models available from Chevrolet, GMC, Jeep, Jaguar and BMW (I may have missed one or two). Ford has announce one model but I don't think it is shipping yet.
So very plain and very simple there are no technical issues that prevent car manufacturers from developing and making models available to the public. Now what about Mazda?
I know there are Mazda apologists here but the facts do not look good for the company. Apparently at one time they were confident that they had a model suitable for sale in North America. They sell thousands of these vehicles around the world to what appears to be very happy owners. Is then the problem the US EPA and CARB agencies that have put up barriers Mazda is unable to overcome? The car buying public has no way of knowing.
It is not up to the EPA or CARB to tell us what is going on with one of their clients (Mazda). They should never have announced a potential Mazda 6 diesel or CX-5 in the first place until it was ready to be marketed. But now that Mazda has leaked and even announced the CX-5 as being available for 2017 they have a duty to keep future car buyers truthfully informed. Why the problem with the certification or is the problem something else? All I want to know is the truth.
It’s a bit melodramatic. It’s a car not a life.
Looks like Hyundai will soon be selling the diesel Santa Fe in Canada at least. I fully expect this model to be sold in the US as well as Canada uses EPA and CARB standards whether they admit it or not.
http://driving.ca/hyundai/santa-fe/...hyundai-to-sell-new-diesel-santa-fe-in-canada
Today there are 2.x L turbo diesel models available from Chevrolet, GMC, Jeep, Jaguar and BMW (I may have missed one or two). Ford has announce one model but I don't think it is shipping yet.
So very plain and very simple there are no technical issues that prevent car manufacturers from developing and making models available to the public. Now what about Mazda?
I know there are Mazda apologists here but the facts do not look good for the company. Apparently at one time they were confident that they had a model suitable for sale in North America. They sell thousands of these vehicles around the world to what appears to be very happy owners. Is then the problem the US EPA and CARB agencies that have put up barriers Mazda is unable to overcome? The car buying public has no way of knowing.
It is not up to the EPA or CARB to tell us what is going on with one of their clients (Mazda). They should never have announced a potential Mazda 6 diesel or CX-5 in the first place until it was ready to be marketed. But now that Mazda has leaked and even announced the CX-5 as being available for 2017 they have a duty to keep future car buyers truthfully informed. Why the problem with the certification or is the problem something else? All I want to know is the truth.
I don’t think the company is in trouble because of the diesel chaos. This thread has gone round and round on the impact of having or not having the diesel. If 10% of US buyers want a diesel (and I think that percentage is high) then the impact is small.
Europe has had diesel for a while now but social clamor to ban or limit diesels is starting to take hold there. This VAG scandal really screwed the goose so to speak.
Mazda has a good future ahead. Their assembly plant in Alabama with Toyota’s alliance will produce the new CX-X and likely a hybrid platform as well. They do need to work on the rest of the lineup though. Their success is also worldwide so we cannot focus on the US and stop there. Mazda is the top brand in Australia. They are selling well in Europe.
This diesel story is just a small blip.
Agreed. This is a big deal to the folks that want the diesel, but the majority of buyers don't seem to care about diesel, frankly.
^^That's just it there are very few choices, none of them intriguing..less tempting
Agreed. This is a big deal to the folks that want the diesel, but the majority of buyers don't seem to care about diesel, frankly.
Agreed. This is a big deal to the folks that want the diesel, but the majority of buyers don't seem to care about diesel, frankly.
I don't agree with that. The 2017 seems a little more planted while cornering on rough roads that made the 2016.5 feel a little skittish. The steering seems to be tuned slightly better. And then there is G-vectoring.
Are diesel vehicles aka cars, SUV's popular in the states (uhm)