(drinks)
mmmm... beer.
(drinks)
Yep. Here's another way to look at the data I posted earlier:
http://www.redmc.net/cx-5/horsepower_gears.png
I overlayed the optimum shift points for a max acceleration run suggested by my previous graph on top of a horsepower curve, trying to illustrate that picking shift points that maximize torque (and thus acceleration) at any given road speed is equivalent to maximizing HP vs. time as you accelerate.
Best thing is to wait until you have a go and see what works for you. I can assure you that revving a small diesel won't get you very far.
Best thing is to wait until you have a go and see what works for you. I can assure you that revving a small diesel won't get you very far.
It works for me.
On both diesels I've had, even Mazda gear the car in top to exceed 2K revs, you are confusing max economy with max performance.
That why I say the car needs another gear, to increase economy, not to make it quicker, 5 gears would probably achieve that.
Its not small at 2.2L
1.6 is small.
Its not small at 2.2L
1.6 is small.
No im not. Revving the engine to that level is a complete waste of fuel but it's also a complete waste of effort too. Changing up sooner decreases the acceleration time.
Average size
ANY car, whether powered by diesel, petrol, LNG, hydrogen, electricity, or fairy dust, will get from point A to point B (or speed A to speed B) fastest when the transmission keeps the revs around the power peak NOT the torque peak.
Peak power in the 2.2D comes at 4500 RPM. If you go back to that shift points graph, you'll see the combined effect of torque and gearing on motive force. At 4500 RPM, even though you're way past the torque peak, you're still accelerating harder than you will be after upshifting to the next gear, simply because of the mechanical advantage of the lower gear. Note that the 2.2D makes more torque than the 2.5L at ANY rpm from idle up to its 5200 rpm redline, yet it's slower 0-60/0-100. The 2.5L holds an advantage in peak power and straight line acceleration simply because it revs higher.
I have never driven the Mazda 2.2D, but I've driven a lot of small diesels: VW/Audi 2.0 TDI and 1.6 Bluemotion, Ford/PSA 1.6 and 2.0, later Ford 2.0, and BMW 2.0. They all feel like they're running out of breath as you rev them out because the torque curve is falling at a steeper rate than we're used to from a petrol car. Some more than others. Mazda's own 2.5T in the CX-9 feels like that too. It's not a very fun or satisfying way to drive a diesel. But when you really want maximum acceleration then staying around the power peak is the way you do it.
One more gear please. I know it's 6 speed automatic transmission. [emoji16]Yep. Here's another way to look at the data I posted earlier:
http://www.redmc.net/cx-5/horsepower_gears.png
I overlayed the optimum shift points for a max acceleration run suggested by my previous graph on top of a horsepower curve, trying to illustrate that picking shift points that maximize torque (and thus acceleration) at any given road speed is equivalent to maximizing HP vs. time as you accelerate.
Correct.
Confirmed today in auto.
One more gear please. I know it's 6 speed automatic transmission. [emoji16]
One more gear please. I know it's 6 speed automatic transmission. [emoji16]
From what I've read the 7.8.9.10 gearbox problems are usually down to software programming being at fault, the same ZF box fitted in different cars can have variable reports.
Even the Mazda 6 speed auto gets some criticism from UK journalists.
Pretty much no criticisms here from Australian journalists
No, Im not aware of any either but that 9 speed ZF is a nightmare in both the LR and Honda applications in terms of reliability and operation. It might be good when they eventually sort it out.
Honda here gets CVT but it's got nothing on the Mazda 6 speed
By the time it gets sorted, 10 speed will be more common - cue manufactures that now have this type of transmission:
- Ford/GM joint venture
- Honda
- Lexus