US Diesel's big splash introduction

From the nz website.

*It*s lighter too and, thanks to a two-stage turbocharger, SKYACTIV-D reaches rpms others thought impossible. The ultra-clean SKYACTIV-D even meets the future Euro 6 emissions standard, all without the need of any expensive exhaust aftertreatment system*

Hopefully Mazda aren*t just cutting and pasting info as NZ has a consumer guarantee act which would give owners recourse against Mzada nz for false advertising.

Our UK diesel has been euro6 since 2012, but the latest standard e6 d temp and WLTP testing requires ad blue to be used.
 
Our UK diesel has been euro6 since 2012, but the latest standard e6 d temp and WLTP testing requires ad blue to be used.

Ours is currently Euro V and that is with 140KW and 450NM

Wonder if it will change when the update arrives (uhm)

(hmm)
 
Our UK diesel has been euro6 since 2012, but the latest standard e6 d temp and WLTP testing requires ad blue to be used.

It would appear mazda views these posts and disappointing to see that the nz website now has euro 5 under cx-5 ( and others)on the website. Since your watching Mazda you might want to change https://www.mazda.co.nz/innovation/driving-engine-technology/skyactiv to remove the reference to exceeding Euro 6 under sky D and state what it really is. Talk about false advertising !
 
It would appear mazda views these posts and disappointing to see that the nz website now has euro 5 under cx-5 ( and others)on the website. Since your watching Mazda you might want to change https://www.mazda.co.nz/innovation/driving-engine-technology/skyactiv to remove the reference to exceeding Euro 6 under sky D and state what it really is. Talk about false advertising !

I think it has always been Euro 5 but for some unknown reason they have stated Euro 6.

NZ specs etc aren't that much different to Australia and we have always been on Euro 5 for CX-5 & 6 diesels.
 
There is no confusion AFAIK.

In order to comply with USA regulations be it emissions or whatever - is the reason why the diesel has received worse EPA fuel economy results.

Exactly. The VW diesel tune made the VW get great mileage but it would fail the EPA emission tests so VW tweaked and cheated to pass the emission test. So while the diesel CX5 could get better mileage it would cause it to fail the EPA test. That's the dilemma. Better mileage = failing emissions vs worse mileage = passing emissions.

Either way. The reality is the CX5 diesel gets abysmall fuel mileage for an expensive diesel engine and the use of urea. Why pay more $$ for an engine that gets gas type mileage and then add all the extra maintenance and costs with running a diesel. It's a lose/lose situation.

American vehicle buyers DO NOT want diesel engines. VW made sure of that with dieselgate. Diesel is dead in the USA for passenger vehicles. Mazda is 8 years behind the curve on this. They should have scrapped the diesel for the USA many years ago. Lesson learned and Mazda lost $$$ on this endeavor.
 
Exactly. The VW diesel tune made the VW get great mileage but it would fail the EPA emission tests so VW tweaked and cheated to pass the emission test. So while the diesel CX5 could get better mileage it would cause it to fail the EPA test. That's the dilemma. Better mileage = failing emissions vs worse mileage = passing emissions.

Either way. The reality is the CX5 diesel gets abysmall fuel mileage for an expensive diesel engine and the use of urea. Why pay more $$ for an engine that gets gas type mileage and then add all the extra maintenance and costs with running a diesel. It's a lose/lose situation.

American vehicle buyers DO NOT want diesel engines. VW made sure of that with dieselgate. Diesel is dead in the USA for passenger vehicles. Mazda is 8 years behind the curve on this. They should have scrapped the diesel for the USA many years ago. Lesson learned and Mazda lost $$$ on this endeavor.

Volkswagen to axe diesel cars in Australia
 
Exactly. The VW diesel tune made the VW get great mileage but it would fail the EPA emission tests so VW tweaked and cheated to pass the emission test. So while the diesel CX5 could get better mileage it would cause it to fail the EPA test. That's the dilemma. Better mileage = failing emissions vs worse mileage = passing emissions.

Either way. The reality is the CX5 diesel gets abysmall fuel mileage for an expensive diesel engine and the use of urea. Why pay more $$ for an engine that gets gas type mileage and then add all the extra maintenance and costs with running a diesel. It's a lose/lose situation.

American vehicle buyers DO NOT want diesel engines. VW made sure of that with dieselgate. Diesel is dead in the USA for passenger vehicles. Mazda is 8 years behind the curve on this. They should have scrapped the diesel for the USA many years ago. Lesson learned and Mazda lost $$$ on this endeavor.



I agree, especially with the SkyActiv X engine coming in.
 

Latest posts

Back