Hi, I'm in need of a spacious family car and as a long-time Mazda user I've decided to take a look at Mazda 5. I've found two offers in my area (Cheshire) that are interesting:
http://www.as-cars.co.uk/mazda-5-2006-phantom-blue-12-months-mot-mpv-7-seat-seater-mazda5-2568-p.asp
http://www.gumtree.com/p/mazda/mazda-5-furano-mpv-64k-miles-full-service-history/1085449139
So here's my main question - which one should I buy? The first one is only a year older yet it's a much cheaper option. On the second hand, the second one has a lower milage. Dear Mazda 5 users, how does the performance and durability of the spares differ in 95k and 64k? Both cars (at least the description says so) are in very good technical condition, but I'm worried the first one will require much more investment in Mazda parts (I only use original ones. Always). What do you think?
http://www.as-cars.co.uk/mazda-5-2006-phantom-blue-12-months-mot-mpv-7-seat-seater-mazda5-2568-p.asp
http://www.gumtree.com/p/mazda/mazda-5-furano-mpv-64k-miles-full-service-history/1085449139
So here's my main question - which one should I buy? The first one is only a year older yet it's a much cheaper option. On the second hand, the second one has a lower milage. Dear Mazda 5 users, how does the performance and durability of the spares differ in 95k and 64k? Both cars (at least the description says so) are in very good technical condition, but I'm worried the first one will require much more investment in Mazda parts (I only use original ones. Always). What do you think?