haha yeah don't feel bad about that mess in my thread...we were all lost for a while. Problem was a number of us had paperwork on multiple different cams, and nothing was lining up because we didn't have measurements at the same lift...so we had to cross reference everything and it took a lot of back and fourth...i'm confident now the last bit of info is close enough...
from my testing so far...I'm using torque pro and an abandoned strip of road near my office that is surprisingly flat...the android app lets me do a number of logs and i'm getting surprisingly consistent whp ratings...I still have yet to precisely measure the weight of my car with me in it and a full tank of gas; a very critical part of correlating acceleration times for whp ratings...but the consistency suggests that when i do get it weighed, the numbers will be very accurate...as of now i can hit 135whp below the limiter (i'm peaking at about 6600 rpm according to the app)...and with twiggys, no joke, its just pulling harder and harder the higher i go...but whats equally surprising, is what the adjustments seem to do to the numbers...
these engines don't tolerate big swings to the intake cam very much...at least with twiggy's...advancing the intake cam to introduce more overlap is pretty much a joke with the mp3 computer...low speed p0300's all day long, and an idle so lopey its almost cartoonish...but if i retard the intake 1 or 2 degrees on the gear (2 to 4 degree closing of crank measured overlap)...the magic starts...at that position, i can move the exhaust cam anywhere i want, and perfectly move the powerband...
i'll try to get you some jpeg's of my dyno logs...torque pro will log a dyno just as a 'real' one...by advancing the exhaust cam to close even more overlap, i get a huge bump in midrange power and torque...and by huge i'm saying enough to break tires loose on a rolling pull in 2nd gear once it rises up to 3800 rpm or so...thats partly due to my pretty seasoned tires, but enough that i couldn't really continue testing that (as in, when a tire looses traction, the whp test is worthless)...
retarding the exhaust cam...opposite...it'll safely move power right up towards redline...to the point where it'll sound like a different engine above 4800rpm...I was able to hit 139whp with the exhaust retarded about 3 degrees...that was as far as i've taken it so far...and again, don't worry about that actual number, its the differences between them that are pretty accurate...
so with all that in mind, i'd make the assumption you could similar move power around with just j-spec cams...albeit the changes won't make quite as a noticeable difference.