I have a 2007 mazdaspeed 3 and ordered a set of motor mount inserts from the good people at CorkSport. I've noticed that my inserts came with instructions which are common with a regular mazda 3.
The instruction say to remove the two bolts of the mount and then "roll the engine up" using a pry bar and another person in order to get the mount out. Why is this? Is it because the bracket connecting it to the transmission is just "naturally" in the way of the motor mounts removal, or does something shift when you undo bolts which requires a prybar to move it back??
http://support.corksport.com/instructions/Axe-6-125-WEB.pdf
I looked at the vids and instructions for a gen 2, 2010 speed 3 and I notice those instructions say to remove the two bolts of the mount and then to remove the bracket by undoing it's 3 bolts as well (no prybar or aditional person involved for 2010).
http://support.corksport.com/instructions/Axl-6-125-WEB.pdf
Anyone know why the motor mount removal/install process differs for a mazdaspeed3 gen1 vs gen2? I thought the drive train was virtually identical. I like the 2010 process better cuz its likely that I will be installing it myself.
The instruction say to remove the two bolts of the mount and then "roll the engine up" using a pry bar and another person in order to get the mount out. Why is this? Is it because the bracket connecting it to the transmission is just "naturally" in the way of the motor mounts removal, or does something shift when you undo bolts which requires a prybar to move it back??
http://support.corksport.com/instructions/Axe-6-125-WEB.pdf
I looked at the vids and instructions for a gen 2, 2010 speed 3 and I notice those instructions say to remove the two bolts of the mount and then to remove the bracket by undoing it's 3 bolts as well (no prybar or aditional person involved for 2010).
http://support.corksport.com/instructions/Axl-6-125-WEB.pdf
Anyone know why the motor mount removal/install process differs for a mazdaspeed3 gen1 vs gen2? I thought the drive train was virtually identical. I like the 2010 process better cuz its likely that I will be installing it myself.