It's not going to stay that way, is it?aMaff said:server upgrades...all the n00bs have that.
I hope not, I think they've been made aware, I'm sure they've got a bunch of kinks to work out w/ the new stuff, so I'm sure they'll get to it.clicknext said:It's not going to stay that way, is it?
pasadena_commut said:It wouldn't be that easy actually, he'd have to be sure that he wasn't doing 64.5 and you 65. If he did use a radar gun he'd have to convince the judge that his hand wasn't moving towards the defendant at 1 MPH.
truth, and I love that idea......I didn't know that in most states there wasn't a hard speed limit.....I guess I'll keep that in mind the next time I drive to my parents in Colorado Springs . In regard to your comments though, I think it's less about car capability and more about driver capability. Sure, a Ferrari can stop faster from 90, but if there's a 16 year old (assuming he's just learning/starting to drive) behind the wheel that doesn't mean he's safer on the road going 90 than the truck at 50. I'm not trying to start anything, I just think this thread is really interesting and love having some intelligent conversation in the matter. Usually threads like these turn into "F*** those pig cops" threads really fast.
Thats why I think driver education needs to be stepped waaaayyyy up from where it is now. You should not be able to pass a drivers test from just piddling around some simple city streets. Drivers tests should cover things like skid recovery and emergency manuvering.
Metal MP5 said:on another note ... the speedometer ALWAYS reads higher than the speed you are actually going. i guess its some kind of safety measure to make you think you're going faster than you actually are. I know that when i'm doing 130km/h my speedo reads about 134km/h ... you can find this out by getting the speed reading directly from the ecu. If you changed tire size, than the reading from the ecu is wrong to start with so there's no point in check any of this ... but with stock wheels/tire, the actual speed is about 3% under the speedo speed. so you set your cruise control at 69 based on the speed you saw on your speedometer right? you were actually maybe doing only 67
chuyler1 said:So drive60MPH in a 65 zone...that will guarantee that you are under the limit.
mogi said:That isn't true, mine reads slow. As stated earlier, mine is 2% off, if I'm going 60MPH, I'm actually going 61.2MPH.
I run stock rims and tire sizes.
Most people don't get rear-ended at full speed unless it's by someone going 20 or 30+ miles over the limit driving recklessly. Worst case scenario is that some one comes up behind you fast, attempts to switch lanes and accidentally clips aonther car or freaks out an SUV driver who attempts to make a swift lane change and rolls into a ditch instead. Meanwhile you just cruise along at 60mph unaware that you caused a 10 car pile up.
Metal MP5 said:i read that the tach and speedo read higher than actual numbers to fool us into thinking we're driving lets say 70mph when we're actually doing 65 or that we're revving at 7000 while its actually revving at 6800 ... i think it was on this forum, can't remember who/when this was though
how did you find out yours read 2% slower ?
mogi said:I tried explaining it earlier in the thread. Use your trip odometer, the mile markers along the highway, your speedometer, and a stopwatch. You can compare your trip to the mile markers, and calculate speed/distance differences with the speedometer and stop watch.
I did this over multiple stretches of road at multiple speeds to try and reduce errors. I came out at 2% damn near every time.