Soon To purchase a CX-9 Maybe?

Hello Everyone,

I am thinking of purchasing a CX-9. I was considering a Highlander or Pilot. I am currently driving a 2004 Acura TL, but I am expecting a 3rd child soon, so the TL won't do. I really was considering the 07 highlander, or waiting for the 08. I like the power in the 08, not for the speed, but for the pickup ect..

Well here are my questions...

1) For the people who purchased the CX-9, what are your thoughts reviews etc?...

2) How much did you pay.. So far in NJ a dealer is quoting a Touring 6-cd Bose w/ mooonroof & Nav for $36,400 and 34,500 W/O Navigation

3) What options did you guys get, and how much

4) Should I look at anything before purchasing it?...

5) Can someone one use the Navi while driving?

6) Who makes the navi?
 
Last edited:
1. wife's happy, I have not driven it much. the driving I have done i'm impressed, but we had a 8 yr old mini van before

2&3. 35,742 w/nav, moon, and hitch
4. ?
5. not for sure yet, but looks like no. Certian functions grey out
6. not sure
 
Did the moon come with 6cd changer?

tstormy said:
1. wife's happy, I have not driven it much. the driving I have done i'm impressed, but we had a 8 yr old mini van before

2&3. 35,742 w/nav, moon, and hitch
4. ?
5. not for sure yet, but looks like no. Certian functions grey out
6. not sure
 
Bought a GT AWD

Whitesnake said:
Hello Everyone,

I am thinking of purchasing a CX-9. I was considering a Highlander or Pilot. I am currently driving a 2004 Acura TL, but I am expecting a 3rd child soon, so the TL won't do. I really was considering the 07 highlander, or waiting for the 08. I like the power in the 08, not for the speed, but for the pickup ect..

Well here are my questions...

1) For the people who purchased the CX-9, what are your thoughts reviews etc?...

2) How much did you pay.. So far in NJ a dealer is quoting a Touring 6-cd Bose w/ mooonroof & Nav for $36,400 and 34,500 W/O Navigation

3) What options did you guys get, and how much

4) Should I look at anything before purchasing it?...

5) Can someone one use the Navi while driving?

6) Who makes the navi?


This is an email I sent to my father-in-law who also happens to be a manager at a Ford dealership. I could have gotten the D-Plan at Ford on an Edge, but decided to pass...


I went to the auto show here in Chicago with three cars on my mind - the Edge, CX-9, and 4Runner. I also looked hard at the Nissan Murano, Acura MDX, and Lexus RX400 (hybrid). I ended up test driving the Edge (twice), CX-9 (twice), 4Runner and RX400. There was no reason to test drive anything else after I drove the CX-9 a second time. I really liked the MDX but it was about $10,000 to $15,000 more than the others (comparably equipped) and I never got around test-driving the Murano (that would have been my next test-drive but it didnt have a third-row seat).

The RX400 was nice but too small and looking kind of long in the tooth interior-wise. The salesman was extremely knowledgeable about the vehicle but failed to ask us any questions about what we were looking for in a car. Interestingly, the lack of questioning of our motivations for buying a vehicle was pervasive. Not one person attempted to explore our intent for purchase. For the most part, they were all nice and low-key, but surprisingly too low-key. The Lexus guy, for example, should have attempted to up-sell us on the 470 (a bigger SUV) since one of the reasons I was looking for a new car was additional space. In fact, I was looking at the 470 out of the corner of my eye, but he never bothered to ask and I just never felt the slightest push to check it out (which I would have had he said something). He assumed we had all of the answers. Angela and I think this type of liaise-fair sales might be reactive to past perceptions buyers have of car salesmen (pushy, just want to make a buck, etc.) but it goes too far. It would have been nice to have someone really care about our needs as much as we did (or at least fake it). I told Angela we might as well replace the salesman with an ATM type machine where I select the car we want to drive, put in my drivers license, get a key, drive the car, and either return the key to the machine or put in some money to buy the vehicle. There just wasnt any value added in my interactions with the salesmen.

But I ramble

The 4Runner was a disaster. I didnt care for the vehicle or the salesman. I like the rugged look of the 4Runner but once behind the wheel it was apparent the interior and driving experience refinement had been lost years ago. The truck is in its 5th year without a major redesign and it showed. Lots of wind-noise and the SUV just didnt feel substantial. I know they have great re-sale value and have a great reliability record but it just wasnt something I was willing purchase for as much money as they were asking. Also the salesman was a fool. All he did was tell me how great Toyota is, how reliable Toyotas are, and how horrible are domestic vehicles. I told him I was comparing the 4Runner to the CX-9 and the Edge and he slammed Ford. I even told him my father-in-law was a manager of a Ford dealership and that my wife had owned a Probe, Mustang, Taurus, Explorer, Expedition, and now a 500 without any problems what-so-ever. What did he do? He slammed Ford again. I kept wondering if he was ever going to figure out that his talking s*** on Ford (and all other domestics) was getting nowhere with me, and in fact, was turning me off completely. He never did. I regret never telling him the 4Runner was the worst vehicle I drove. I may send him a letter

To the Edge I really (REALLY) wanted to like the Edge. I was looking at the fully loaded AWD SEL+ with nav and panoramic sun-roof. The sun-roof is awesome on the Edge and reminded me of my Jeep CJ-7. I could definitely see myself tooling around town in the summertime with that roof pulled back. At the car show it was absolutely my favorite. I love the exterior styling and the black leather seats with the contrast stitching. Very nice. I found the center console to be nice, but nothing grand. Most of the instrumentation is lifted from the 500 (navigation, climate controls, etc.). However, that didnt bother me so much at that time. The biggest hesitation at that point (pre-test drive) was the lack of a third-row seat. It wasnt a deal-breaker but it was an item of consideration.

The real issue arose when I drove the Edge. I had read the articles about the new engine and transmission and I was interested to see how it would compare to Angelas 500 (she has the older V6 with a CVT). Surprisingly, there was no comparison. Angelas 500 feels much more powerful and refined. The Edge seemed stumbly (yes, stumbly) running through the gears, and the engine sounded taxed. The driving experience was a total snoozer. The tranny (co-developed with GMC as you probably know) felt hesitant and oddly geared. No oomph whatsoever. Once experienced, the center console and lack of third seat became bigger issues that added-up to a less than acceptable vehicle. Im sad to say the Edge dropped off my list completely. I think Ford has a great design in the Edge but the tranny and center console needs to be tweaked and a third-row should be introduced (regardless of the Freestyle and Explorer sales).

To my carthe CX-9.

I really love this ride! The engine is the exact same as that in the Ford, but the Aisin transmission Mazda has mated to it is leaps and bounds more refined than the Edges. Its ready to go at a moments notice and it makes the engine sound and feel well equipped to handle the load. The CX-9 also has a triptronic feature that allows manual transition through the six speeds (the good news here for Ford is that I believe the engine theyve produced is capable given the right drive-train). The CX-9 is 14 longer than the Edge and has a wonderfully accessible third-row seat that is actually comfortable for grown adults. I found the fit and finish completely up-scale. After driving the Lexus and sitting in the Acura, I had nothing but awe for the quality of appearance and feel of the interior for the CX-9 given the price. The bells and whistles are all there too. I have the Grand Touring CX-9 with navigation, sun-roof and auto-dimming mirror. It comes with Bluetooth for my phone (I can take calls via my steering wheel), voice responsive navigation, three zone individual climate controls, remote start, and advanced key system (to name a few). The advanced key system is actually a credit card sized fob that allows me to lock and unlock the doors, and start the engine without an actual key. The advanced key even remembers seating preference for the particular key. If my key is sensed as the one closest to the drivers seat upon entrance, the seat will move to my preferred position. Pretty cool. Also, it comes with a remote start that works from about 250 YARDS! Great for the winter. The navigation has a back-up camera when in reverse. The leather interior is very nice. The CX-9 gives me big vehicle convenience with a smaller, sportier car feel. Its REALLY fun to drive.

The second time I drove the car I knew I was finished. Done deal. Interestingly, the lease price was LESS than what I was given by the Ford dealer for the Edge with a D-Plan (given I was being offered $800 less for my Protg by Ford than by Mazda not that price would have swayed my decision). But still!?!?! Im pretty sure Mazda has some sort of introductory lease special going on the CX-9 that I was able to take advantage of - either that or I was given the run-around by the Ford dealer (much easier to follow the payments with a sale than a lease so Im not sure). The Ford dealer had me at a 39 month lease with 12,000 miles, and $4,500 on trade-in for $470 a month (Chicago has crazy lease taxes). The Mazda dealer had a $3000 more expensive car (same terms but with a $5300 trade-in) at $469 a month. Since the Mazda dealer had the exact car I wanted in the colors I wanted I pulled the trigger.

That's then end of the email I sent.

The price I paid for my CX-9 GT AWD with nav, sunroof, wheel locks, remote start, and autodim mirror was $36,800. I'm not sure who makes the nav system. Some aspects of the system are disabled (new address entry, etc.) when the vehicle is moving and then enabled when stopped.

Hope it helps...
 
Last edited:
Thanks

Thank You for your response, I really apreciate it. I've owned a Escort Pony, Taurus Gl & a thunderbird. they are fine cars .. nothing major with them... Then I went for a 2001 Acuracl then a 2004 AcuraTL.. Both are GREAT cars. Honda has converted me to jap cars. The reason I need a car now is that I got married and she has 2 kids... My wife is pregnant and we are going to have a total of 3 kids.. Now I need a car that can take 5 passengers (2 adults, 1 baby seat and 2 boosters). Shez going to get a Sienna AWD for the long trips. I wanna get something like the Pilot, Highlander or the CX-9. I was planning to wait for the 08 highlander since it will be redesigned.. The only thing is I really don' t know enough about Mazda, resale value, Quality, etc.. Still have a lot of thinking to do..

Thanks


seanbirm01 said:
This is an email I sent to my father-in-law who also happens to be a manager at a Ford dealership. I could have gotten the D-Plan at Ford on an Edge, but decided to pass...


I went to the auto show here in Chicago with three cars on my mind - the Edge, CX-9, and 4Runner. I also looked hard at the Nissan Murano, Acura MDX, and Lexus RX400 (hybrid). I ended up test driving the Edge (twice), CX-9 (twice), 4Runner and RX400. There was no reason to test drive anything else after I drove the CX-9 a second time. I really liked the MDX but it was about $10,000 to $15,000 more than the others (comparably equipped) and I never got around test-driving the Murano (that would have been my next test-drive but it didnt have a third-row seat).

The RX400 was nice but too small and looking kind of long in the tooth interior-wise. The salesman was extremely knowledgeable about the vehicle but failed to ask us any questions about what we were looking for in a car. Interestingly, the lack of questioning of our motivations for buying a vehicle was pervasive. Not one person attempted to explore our intent for purchase. For the most part, they were all nice and low-key, but surprisingly too low-key. The Lexus guy, for example, should have attempted to up-sell us on the 470 (a bigger SUV) since one of the reasons I was looking for a new car was additional space. In fact, I was looking at the 470 out of the corner of my eye, but he never bothered to ask and I just never felt the slightest push to check it out (which I would have had he said something). He assumed we had all of the answers. Angela and I think this type of liaise-fair sales might be reactive to past perceptions buyers have of car salesmen (pushy, just want to make a buck, etc.) but it goes too far. It would have been nice to have someone really care about our needs as much as we did (or at least fake it). I told Angela we might as well replace the salesman with an ATM type machine where I select the car we want to drive, put in my drivers license, get a key, drive the car, and either return the key to the machine or put in some money to buy the vehicle. There just wasnt any value added in my interactions with the salesmen.

But I ramble

The 4Runner was a disaster. I didnt care for the vehicle or the salesman. I like the rugged look of the 4Runner but once behind the wheel it was apparent the interior and driving experience refinement had been lost years ago. The truck is in its 5th year without a major redesign and it showed. Lots of wind-noise and the SUV just didnt feel substantial. I know they have great re-sale value and have a great reliability record but it just wasnt something I was willing purchase for as much money as they were asking. Also the salesman was a fool. All he did was tell me how great Toyota is, how reliable Toyotas are, and how horrible are domestic vehicles. I told him I was comparing the 4Runner to the CX-9 and the Edge and he slammed Ford. I even told him my father-in-law was a manager of a Ford dealership and that my wife had owned a Probe, Mustang, Taurus, Explorer, Expedition, and now a 500 without any problems what-so-ever. What did he do? He slammed Ford again. I kept wondering if he was ever going to figure out that his talking s*** on Ford (and all other domestics) was getting nowhere with me, and in fact, was turning me off completely. He never did. I regret never telling him the 4Runner was the worst vehicle I drove. I may send him a letter

To the Edge I really (REALLY) wanted to like the Edge. I was looking at the fully loaded AWD SEL+ with nav and panoramic sun-roof. The sun-roof is awesome on the Edge and reminded me of my Jeep CJ-7. I could definitely see myself tooling around town in the summertime with that roof pulled back. At the car show it was absolutely my favorite. I love the exterior styling and the black leather seats with the contrast stitching. Very nice. I found the center console to be nice, but nothing grand. Most of the instrumentation is lifted from the 500 (navigation, climate controls, etc.). However, that didnt bother me so much at that time. The biggest hesitation at that point (pre-test drive) was the lack of a third-row seat. It wasnt a deal-breaker but it was an item of consideration.

The real issue arose when I drove the Edge. I had read the articles about the new engine and transmission and I was interested to see how it would compare to Angelas 500 (she has the older V6 with a CVT). Surprisingly, there was no comparison. Angelas 500 feels much more powerful and refined. The Edge seemed stumbly (yes, stumbly) running through the gears, and the engine sounded taxed. The driving experience was a total snoozer. The tranny (co-developed with GMC as you probably know) felt hesitant and oddly geared. No oomph whatsoever. Once experienced, the center console and lack of third seat became bigger issues that added-up to a less than acceptable vehicle. Im sad to say the Edge dropped off my list completely. I think Ford has a great design in the Edge but the tranny and center console needs to be tweaked and a third-row should be introduced (regardless of the Freestyle and Explorer sales).

To my carthe CX-9.

I really love this ride! The engine is the exact same as that in the Ford, but the Aisin transmission Mazda has mated to it is leaps and bounds more refined than the Edges. Its ready to go at a moments notice and it makes the engine sound and feel well equipped to handle the load. The CX-9 also has a triptronic feature that allows manual transition through the six speeds (the good news here for Ford is that I believe the engine theyve produced is capable given the right drive-train). The CX-9 is 14 longer than the Edge and has a wonderfully accessible third-row seat that is actually comfortable for grown adults. I found the fit and finish completely up-scale. After driving the Lexus and sitting in the Acura, I had nothing but awe for the quality of appearance and feel of the interior for the CX-9 given the price. The bells and whistles are all there too. I have the Grand Touring CX-9 with navigation, sun-roof and auto-dimming mirror. It comes with Bluetooth for my phone (I can take calls via my steering wheel), voice responsive navigation, three zone individual climate controls, remote start, and advanced key system (to name a few). The advanced key system is actually a credit card sized fob that allows me to lock and unlock the doors, and start the engine without an actual key. The advanced key even remembers seating preference for the particular key. If my key is sensed as the one closest to the drivers seat upon entrance, the seat will move to my preferred position. Pretty cool. Also, it comes with a remote start that works from about 250 YARDS! Great for the winter. The navigation has a back-up camera when in reverse. The leather interior is very nice. The CX-9 gives me big vehicle convenience with a smaller, sportier car feel. Its REALLY fun to drive.

The second time I drove the car I knew I was finished. Done deal. Interestingly, the lease price was LESS than what I was given by the Ford dealer for the Edge with a D-Plan (given I was being offered $800 less for my Protg by Ford than by Mazda not that price would have swayed my decision). But still!?!?! Im pretty sure Mazda has some sort of introductory lease special going on the CX-9 that I was able to take advantage of - either that or I was given the run-around by the Ford dealer (much easier to follow the payments with a sale than a lease so Im not sure). The Ford dealer had me at a 39 month lease with 12,000 miles, and $4,500 on trade-in for $470 a month (Chicago has crazy lease taxes). The Mazda dealer had a $3000 more expensive car (same terms but with a $5300 trade-in) at $469 a month. Since the Mazda dealer had the exact car I wanted in the colors I wanted I pulled the trigger.

That's then end of the email I sent.

The price I paid for my CX-9 GT AWD with nav, sunroof, wheel locks, remote start, and autodim mirror was $36,800. I'm not sure who makes the nav system. Some aspects of the system are disabled (new address entry, etc.) when the vehicle is moving and then enabled when stopped.

Hope it helps...
 
Seanbirm01,

I am working on a deal to buy a GT FWD with just the Bose and sunroof package. I have a question on the remote start-does it come standard on the GT package? When you look at the CX-9 brochure it shows advanced key/starting package standard on the GT, but an option on the Touring. But when building a GT on-line it offers that as a $350 option? I would ask the dealer, but they have no clue since the vehicles are just hitting the lots and they have no GT's to compare.

Thanks.



seanbirm01 said:
This is an email I sent to my father-in-law who also happens to be a manager at a Ford dealership. I could have gotten the D-Plan at Ford on an Edge, but decided to pass...


I went to the auto show here in Chicago with three cars on my mind - the Edge, CX-9, and 4Runner. I also looked hard at the Nissan Murano, Acura MDX, and Lexus RX400 (hybrid). I ended up test driving the Edge (twice), CX-9 (twice), 4Runner and RX400. There was no reason to test drive anything else after I drove the CX-9 a second time. I really liked the MDX but it was about $10,000 to $15,000 more than the others (comparably equipped) and I never got around test-driving the Murano (that would have been my next test-drive but it didnt have a third-row seat).

The RX400 was nice but too small and looking kind of long in the tooth interior-wise. The salesman was extremely knowledgeable about the vehicle but failed to ask us any questions about what we were looking for in a car. Interestingly, the lack of questioning of our motivations for buying a vehicle was pervasive. Not one person attempted to explore our intent for purchase. For the most part, they were all nice and low-key, but surprisingly too low-key. The Lexus guy, for example, should have attempted to up-sell us on the 470 (a bigger SUV) since one of the reasons I was looking for a new car was additional space. In fact, I was looking at the 470 out of the corner of my eye, but he never bothered to ask and I just never felt the slightest push to check it out (which I would have had he said something). He assumed we had all of the answers. Angela and I think this type of liaise-fair sales might be reactive to past perceptions buyers have of car salesmen (pushy, just want to make a buck, etc.) but it goes too far. It would have been nice to have someone really care about our needs as much as we did (or at least fake it). I told Angela we might as well replace the salesman with an ATM type machine where I select the car we want to drive, put in my drivers license, get a key, drive the car, and either return the key to the machine or put in some money to buy the vehicle. There just wasnt any value added in my interactions with the salesmen.

But I ramble

The 4Runner was a disaster. I didnt care for the vehicle or the salesman. I like the rugged look of the 4Runner but once behind the wheel it was apparent the interior and driving experience refinement had been lost years ago. The truck is in its 5th year without a major redesign and it showed. Lots of wind-noise and the SUV just didnt feel substantial. I know they have great re-sale value and have a great reliability record but it just wasnt something I was willing purchase for as much money as they were asking. Also the salesman was a fool. All he did was tell me how great Toyota is, how reliable Toyotas are, and how horrible are domestic vehicles. I told him I was comparing the 4Runner to the CX-9 and the Edge and he slammed Ford. I even told him my father-in-law was a manager of a Ford dealership and that my wife had owned a Probe, Mustang, Taurus, Explorer, Expedition, and now a 500 without any problems what-so-ever. What did he do? He slammed Ford again. I kept wondering if he was ever going to figure out that his talking s*** on Ford (and all other domestics) was getting nowhere with me, and in fact, was turning me off completely. He never did. I regret never telling him the 4Runner was the worst vehicle I drove. I may send him a letter

To the Edge I really (REALLY) wanted to like the Edge. I was looking at the fully loaded AWD SEL+ with nav and panoramic sun-roof. The sun-roof is awesome on the Edge and reminded me of my Jeep CJ-7. I could definitely see myself tooling around town in the summertime with that roof pulled back. At the car show it was absolutely my favorite. I love the exterior styling and the black leather seats with the contrast stitching. Very nice. I found the center console to be nice, but nothing grand. Most of the instrumentation is lifted from the 500 (navigation, climate controls, etc.). However, that didnt bother me so much at that time. The biggest hesitation at that point (pre-test drive) was the lack of a third-row seat. It wasnt a deal-breaker but it was an item of consideration.

The real issue arose when I drove the Edge. I had read the articles about the new engine and transmission and I was interested to see how it would compare to Angelas 500 (she has the older V6 with a CVT). Surprisingly, there was no comparison. Angelas 500 feels much more powerful and refined. The Edge seemed stumbly (yes, stumbly) running through the gears, and the engine sounded taxed. The driving experience was a total snoozer. The tranny (co-developed with GMC as you probably know) felt hesitant and oddly geared. No oomph whatsoever. Once experienced, the center console and lack of third seat became bigger issues that added-up to a less than acceptable vehicle. Im sad to say the Edge dropped off my list completely. I think Ford has a great design in the Edge but the tranny and center console needs to be tweaked and a third-row should be introduced (regardless of the Freestyle and Explorer sales).

To my carthe CX-9.

I really love this ride! The engine is the exact same as that in the Ford, but the Aisin transmission Mazda has mated to it is leaps and bounds more refined than the Edges. Its ready to go at a moments notice and it makes the engine sound and feel well equipped to handle the load. The CX-9 also has a triptronic feature that allows manual transition through the six speeds (the good news here for Ford is that I believe the engine theyve produced is capable given the right drive-train). The CX-9 is 14 longer than the Edge and has a wonderfully accessible third-row seat that is actually comfortable for grown adults. I found the fit and finish completely up-scale. After driving the Lexus and sitting in the Acura, I had nothing but awe for the quality of appearance and feel of the interior for the CX-9 given the price. The bells and whistles are all there too. I have the Grand Touring CX-9 with navigation, sun-roof and auto-dimming mirror. It comes with Bluetooth for my phone (I can take calls via my steering wheel), voice responsive navigation, three zone individual climate controls, remote start, and advanced key system (to name a few). The advanced key system is actually a credit card sized fob that allows me to lock and unlock the doors, and start the engine without an actual key. The advanced key even remembers seating preference for the particular key. If my key is sensed as the one closest to the drivers seat upon entrance, the seat will move to my preferred position. Pretty cool. Also, it comes with a remote start that works from about 250 YARDS! Great for the winter. The navigation has a back-up camera when in reverse. The leather interior is very nice. The CX-9 gives me big vehicle convenience with a smaller, sportier car feel. Its REALLY fun to drive.

The second time I drove the car I knew I was finished. Done deal. Interestingly, the lease price was LESS than what I was given by the Ford dealer for the Edge with a D-Plan (given I was being offered $800 less for my Protg by Ford than by Mazda not that price would have swayed my decision). But still!?!?! Im pretty sure Mazda has some sort of introductory lease special going on the CX-9 that I was able to take advantage of - either that or I was given the run-around by the Ford dealer (much easier to follow the payments with a sale than a lease so Im not sure). The Ford dealer had me at a 39 month lease with 12,000 miles, and $4,500 on trade-in for $470 a month (Chicago has crazy lease taxes). The Mazda dealer had a $3000 more expensive car (same terms but with a $5300 trade-in) at $469 a month. Since the Mazda dealer had the exact car I wanted in the colors I wanted I pulled the trigger.

That's then end of the email I sent.

The price I paid for my CX-9 GT AWD with nav, sunroof, wheel locks, remote start, and autodim mirror was $36,800. I'm not sure who makes the nav system. Some aspects of the system are disabled (new address entry, etc.) when the vehicle is moving and then enabled when stopped.

Hope it helps...
 
The advanced key/starting package is just a way to start the car without a key inserted but you still have to press a button. There is still a remote you have to have with you (it doesn't start the car, you still have to press a button in the car).. It needs to be close by.. like on some cars you just have to push a button. a "remote start" is just that.. from a "remote location".. far away..

sbmrinaldi said:
Seanbirm01,

I am working on a deal to buy a GT FWD with just the Bose and sunroof package. I have a question on the remote start-does it come standard on the GT package? When you look at the CX-9 brochure it shows advanced key/starting package standard on the GT, but an option on the Touring. But when building a GT on-line it offers that as a $350 option? I would ask the dealer, but they have no clue since the vehicles are just hitting the lots and they have no GT's to compare.

Thanks.
 
Advance Key vs. Remote Start

Whitesnake said:
The advanced key/starting package is just a way to start the car without a key inserted but you still have to press a button. There is still a remote you have to have with you (it doesn't start the car, you still have to press a button in the car).. It needs to be close by.. like on some cars you just have to push a button. a "remote start" is just that.. from a "remote location".. far away..

The advance key is standard with the GT. The remote start is an additional factory installed or after-market item.

The Touring has a standard key that pops out of the fob like a switch-blade. The GT has the advance key which is the size of a credit card. The advance key has buttons to lock/unlock doors, activate panic button, and open the power tailgate (future feature). It also has a valet key that slides into the fob. The advance key allows the carrier to lock/unlock doors and tailgate, and to start the vehicle without actually inserting a key into a key-hole. There is a small black button on the driver, front passenger, and tailgate door handles that can be pressed to lock and unlock the doors. Once inside the vehicle - no key needs to be inserted into the ignition - just twist and go. The drive seat adjustments can even be set to recognize each individual advanced key fob. The advanced key works up to about 3 meters from the vehicle.

The remote start allows the vehicle to be started from a remote location that extends 250 (feet or yards? I don't remember) from the vehicle. In other words, I can be in my house or office and remotely start my car to warm it up. As a security feature, once anyone attempts to put the vehicle in drive the CX-9 will shut-down until someone with a key (advanced or standard) restarts the engine.
 
Whitesnake said:
Thank You for your response, I really apreciate it. I've owned a Escort Pony, Taurus Gl & a thunderbird. they are fine cars .. nothing major with them... Then I went for a 2001 Acuracl then a 2004 AcuraTL.. Both are GREAT cars. Honda has converted me to jap cars. The reason I need a car now is that I got married and she has 2 kids... My wife is pregnant and we are going to have a total of 3 kids.. Now I need a car that can take 5 passengers (2 adults, 1 baby seat and 2 boosters). Shez going to get a Sienna AWD for the long trips. I wanna get something like the Pilot, Highlander or the CX-9. I was planning to wait for the 08 highlander since it will be redesigned.. The only thing is I really don' t know enough about Mazda, resale value, Quality, etc.. Still have a lot of thinking to do..

Thanks


The Pilot is slated to be redesigned this year as well. No pics have been released yet but I'm sure it will be a great vehicle.

Regarding Mazda quality and resale value: I've had three Mazdas. An early B2300 small-sized pick-up truck, a 2001 Mazda Protege ES 2.0, and now my 2007 CX-9. I never had any problems with any of my Mazdas. I paid around $17,000 for my Protege (new) and I traded it in for $5,300 when I got my CX-9. I had it listed on Craigslist prior to buying my CX-9 and had three people call and offer $7,000 after I had dealt with the Mazda dealer (oh, well...). The Protege had 70,000 miles on it and the only item that went bad was my alternator and timing belts at 65,000 miles. Except for some standard dings and scratches it was in perfect condition and still fun to drive.
 
seanbirm01 said:
This is an email I sent to my father-in-law who also happens to be a manager at a Ford dealership. I could have gotten the D-Plan at Ford on an Edge, but decided to pass...

That was a very nice write up. I used to sell Mazdas and the one thing that I had always heard of was customers shopping sales people. I never expierenced it(atleast I don't think so), but this is the first time I have heard someone doing that. Again, great write up, I am looking for an SUV myself so I will keep this in mind when looking. I think the CX-9 will be a little larger and a bit out of my price range.
 
I am getting my GT tomorrow. Picked up the Copper red with tan/sand interior FWD and Bose/moonroof package for $32400 plus tax. Hope I made a good decision. Last minute we checked out the local Jeep dealer and rep was willing to sell me a loaded Commander (navi, DVD entertainment, hemi,etc) for $32450 with a list of $44000. Seemed like a great deal, but the Hemi shows a whopping 14 mpg in the city and 19 for hwy. I am also not 100% comfortable with the boxiness. The price was greensheeted using his relatives pricing program. He must really need a sale.

As a nice contender I also drove a nice used Montero Limited. It was an 02 with 65k, but it gave me an idea of the ride. I could pick one up and pay cash which would be nice as opposed to financing, but the wife opted for the CX-9.
 
I believe the Pilot is to be redesigned as an 09. I spoke with a Honda rep at the Chicago Auto Show and they told me it will come out in fall 2008 as an 09 model and no changes until then.

Steve

[

QUOTE=seanbirm01]The Pilot is slated to be redesigned this year as well. No pics have been released yet but I'm sure it will be a great vehicle.

Regarding Mazda quality and resale value: I've had three Mazdas. An early B2300 small-sized pick-up truck, a 2001 Mazda Protege ES 2.0, and now my 2007 CX-9. I never had any problems with any of my Mazdas. I paid around $17,000 for my Protege (new) and I traded it in for $5,300 when I got my CX-9. I had it listed on Craigslist prior to buying my CX-9 and had three people call and offer $7,000 after I had dealt with the Mazda dealer (oh, well...). The Protege had 70,000 miles on it and the only item that went bad was my alternator and timing belts at 65,000 miles. Except for some standard dings and scratches it was in perfect condition and still fun to drive.[/QUOTE]
 
How did you manage that price?.. Invoice is 32,324

sbmrinaldi said:
I am getting my GT tomorrow. Picked up the Copper red with tan/sand interior FWD and Bose/moonroof package for $32400 plus tax. Hope I made a good decision. Last minute we checked out the local Jeep dealer and rep was willing to sell me a loaded Commander (navi, DVD entertainment, hemi,etc) for $32450 with a list of $44000. Seemed like a great deal, but the Hemi shows a whopping 14 mpg in the city and 19 for hwy. I am also not 100% comfortable with the boxiness. The price was greensheeted using his relatives pricing program. He must really need a sale.

As a nice contender I also drove a nice used Montero Limited. It was an 02 with 65k, but it gave me an idea of the ride. I could pick one up and pay cash which would be nice as opposed to financing, but the wife opted for the CX-9.
 
I quoted as many dealers as possible. One dealer quoted me $3046 off a GT with dvd, FWD GT edition. That was via internet quote which I could print and show other dealers. That dealer would sell me that vehicle, but would not honor that discount level on another CX-9 since they claim the internet person misquoted. Since I wanted the moonroof/Bose package instead I took the quote to my local dealer and they would settle on $2600 off plus work a deal on some extras; hood deflector, mud flaps, and allweather mats. It is the end of the month and my local dealer appears to be desperate to make some numbers. They are getting the car within 12 hours just to make the sale by the end of the day tomorrow.(they had to dealer locate the one I wanted)

Whitesnake said:
How did you manage that price?.. Invoice is 32,324
 
Excellent write up, very helpful. I test drove the CX-9, MDX and Q7, right now strongly leaning toward the CX-9. (love the look and drive)

I'd like to get more information on the CX-9, but I don't have the owner's manual. Can some of the CX-9 owners help answering some of my questions below:

Does the CX-9 have these:

1. Brake pad wear warning light/indicator? If so, does it tell you whether the front or rear need replacement?

2. Door ajar warning - does it show you which door? Does it include the sunroof if left opened?

3. Low fuel warning? Is it audible or just indicator on dash?

4. Low coolant/oil warning lights?

5. head lights/brake lights failure warning?

6. Is it true that the low-tire-pressure warning is just a light on dash, and doesn't tell you which tire is low?

7. Does it indicat whether it's in AWD mode or traction control when it is engaged?

8. How is the maintenance reminder system, is it just based on mileage driven or based on the way the person drives?

Thanks in advance..


seanbirm01 said:
........

The price I paid for my CX-9 GT AWD with nav, sunroof, wheel locks, remote start, and autodim mirror was $36,800. I'm not sure who makes the nav system. Some aspects of the system are disabled (new address entry, etc.) when the vehicle is moving and then enabled when stopped.

Hope it helps...
 
what was your total price with tax?

With taxes and fees what was your total?

seanbirm01 said:
This is an email I sent to my father-in-law who also happens to be a manager at a Ford dealership. I could have gotten the D-Plan at Ford on an Edge, but decided to pass...


I went to the auto show here in Chicago with three cars on my mind - the Edge, CX-9, and 4Runner. I also looked hard at the Nissan Murano, Acura MDX, and Lexus RX400 (hybrid). I ended up test driving the Edge (twice), CX-9 (twice), 4Runner and RX400. There was no reason to test drive anything else after I drove the CX-9 a second time. I really liked the MDX but it was about $10,000 to $15,000 more than the others (comparably equipped) and I never got around test-driving the Murano (that would have been my next test-drive but it didnt have a third-row seat).

The RX400 was nice but too small and looking kind of long in the tooth interior-wise. The salesman was extremely knowledgeable about the vehicle but failed to ask us any questions about what we were looking for in a car. Interestingly, the lack of questioning of our motivations for buying a vehicle was pervasive. Not one person attempted to explore our intent for purchase. For the most part, they were all nice and low-key, but surprisingly too low-key. The Lexus guy, for example, should have attempted to up-sell us on the 470 (a bigger SUV) since one of the reasons I was looking for a new car was additional space. In fact, I was looking at the 470 out of the corner of my eye, but he never bothered to ask and I just never felt the slightest push to check it out (which I would have had he said something). He assumed we had all of the answers. Angela and I think this type of liaise-fair sales might be reactive to past perceptions buyers have of car salesmen (pushy, just want to make a buck, etc.) but it goes too far. It would have been nice to have someone really care about our needs as much as we did (or at least fake it). I told Angela we might as well replace the salesman with an ATM type machine where I select the car we want to drive, put in my drivers license, get a key, drive the car, and either return the key to the machine or put in some money to buy the vehicle. There just wasnt any value added in my interactions with the salesmen.

But I ramble

The 4Runner was a disaster. I didnt care for the vehicle or the salesman. I like the rugged look of the 4Runner but once behind the wheel it was apparent the interior and driving experience refinement had been lost years ago. The truck is in its 5th year without a major redesign and it showed. Lots of wind-noise and the SUV just didnt feel substantial. I know they have great re-sale value and have a great reliability record but it just wasnt something I was willing purchase for as much money as they were asking. Also the salesman was a fool. All he did was tell me how great Toyota is, how reliable Toyotas are, and how horrible are domestic vehicles. I told him I was comparing the 4Runner to the CX-9 and the Edge and he slammed Ford. I even told him my father-in-law was a manager of a Ford dealership and that my wife had owned a Probe, Mustang, Taurus, Explorer, Expedition, and now a 500 without any problems what-so-ever. What did he do? He slammed Ford again. I kept wondering if he was ever going to figure out that his talking s*** on Ford (and all other domestics) was getting nowhere with me, and in fact, was turning me off completely. He never did. I regret never telling him the 4Runner was the worst vehicle I drove. I may send him a letter

To the Edge I really (REALLY) wanted to like the Edge. I was looking at the fully loaded AWD SEL+ with nav and panoramic sun-roof. The sun-roof is awesome on the Edge and reminded me of my Jeep CJ-7. I could definitely see myself tooling around town in the summertime with that roof pulled back. At the car show it was absolutely my favorite. I love the exterior styling and the black leather seats with the contrast stitching. Very nice. I found the center console to be nice, but nothing grand. Most of the instrumentation is lifted from the 500 (navigation, climate controls, etc.). However, that didnt bother me so much at that time. The biggest hesitation at that point (pre-test drive) was the lack of a third-row seat. It wasnt a deal-breaker but it was an item of consideration.

The real issue arose when I drove the Edge. I had read the articles about the new engine and transmission and I was interested to see how it would compare to Angelas 500 (she has the older V6 with a CVT). Surprisingly, there was no comparison. Angelas 500 feels much more powerful and refined. The Edge seemed stumbly (yes, stumbly) running through the gears, and the engine sounded taxed. The driving experience was a total snoozer. The tranny (co-developed with GMC as you probably know) felt hesitant and oddly geared. No oomph whatsoever. Once experienced, the center console and lack of third seat became bigger issues that added-up to a less than acceptable vehicle. Im sad to say the Edge dropped off my list completely. I think Ford has a great design in the Edge but the tranny and center console needs to be tweaked and a third-row should be introduced (regardless of the Freestyle and Explorer sales).

To my carthe CX-9.

I really love this ride! The engine is the exact same as that in the Ford, but the Aisin transmission Mazda has mated to it is leaps and bounds more refined than the Edges. Its ready to go at a moments notice and it makes the engine sound and feel well equipped to handle the load. The CX-9 also has a triptronic feature that allows manual transition through the six speeds (the good news here for Ford is that I believe the engine theyve produced is capable given the right drive-train). The CX-9 is 14 longer than the Edge and has a wonderfully accessible third-row seat that is actually comfortable for grown adults. I found the fit and finish completely up-scale. After driving the Lexus and sitting in the Acura, I had nothing but awe for the quality of appearance and feel of the interior for the CX-9 given the price. The bells and whistles are all there too. I have the Grand Touring CX-9 with navigation, sun-roof and auto-dimming mirror. It comes with Bluetooth for my phone (I can take calls via my steering wheel), voice responsive navigation, three zone individual climate controls, remote start, and advanced key system (to name a few). The advanced key system is actually a credit card sized fob that allows me to lock and unlock the doors, and start the engine without an actual key. The advanced key even remembers seating preference for the particular key. If my key is sensed as the one closest to the drivers seat upon entrance, the seat will move to my preferred position. Pretty cool. Also, it comes with a remote start that works from about 250 YARDS! Great for the winter. The navigation has a back-up camera when in reverse. The leather interior is very nice. The CX-9 gives me big vehicle convenience with a smaller, sportier car feel. Its REALLY fun to drive.

The second time I drove the car I knew I was finished. Done deal. Interestingly, the lease price was LESS than what I was given by the Ford dealer for the Edge with a D-Plan (given I was being offered $800 less for my Protg by Ford than by Mazda not that price would have swayed my decision). But still!?!?! Im pretty sure Mazda has some sort of introductory lease special going on the CX-9 that I was able to take advantage of - either that or I was given the run-around by the Ford dealer (much easier to follow the payments with a sale than a lease so Im not sure). The Ford dealer had me at a 39 month lease with 12,000 miles, and $4,500 on trade-in for $470 a month (Chicago has crazy lease taxes). The Mazda dealer had a $3000 more expensive car (same terms but with a $5300 trade-in) at $469 a month. Since the Mazda dealer had the exact car I wanted in the colors I wanted I pulled the trigger.

That's then end of the email I sent.

The price I paid for my CX-9 GT AWD with nav, sunroof, wheel locks, remote start, and autodim mirror was $36,800. I'm not sure who makes the nav system. Some aspects of the system are disabled (new address entry, etc.) when the vehicle is moving and then enabled when stopped.

Hope it helps...
 
black cherry

Put the mud flaps on my self

IMG_3670.JPG
IMG_3673.JPG
IMG_3674.JPG
 
Back