- :
- 2014 QX70 AWD
"The 2017 model’s 0-30 mph acceleration time of 2.8 seconds is noticeably improved over a 2016 CR-V Touring’s 3.3-second time, but not as quick as the 2016 CX-5’s 2.5-second time. To 60, the CX-5 is good for a 7.8-second time, the 2016 CR-V comes in at 8.3 seconds, and the turbocharged 2017 CR-V at 7.5 seconds."
Summary: differences are largely negligible.
"The 2017 CR-V feels light on its feet and although it’s still no CX-5 on a winding road, the Honda holds its own"
Summary: Slight edge to CX5
"The 2017 CR-V Touring AWD turned in Real MPG of 21.9/34.2 mpg city/highway, and 26.1 mpg combined, or underperforming its EPA rating in the city, and exceeding the highway estimate."
Summary: CX5 gets better city MPG, Honda wins highway MPG. And I get ~27.5 real world combined MPG in my CX5, which beats the 26.1 noted above.
But hey, they added a freakin' volume knob to the 2017 CRV... so the apocalypse is held at bay, for now.
http://www.motortrend.com/cars/honda/cr-v/2017/2017-honda-cr-v-touring-awd-first-test-review/
Summary: differences are largely negligible.
"The 2017 CR-V feels light on its feet and although it’s still no CX-5 on a winding road, the Honda holds its own"
Summary: Slight edge to CX5
"The 2017 CR-V Touring AWD turned in Real MPG of 21.9/34.2 mpg city/highway, and 26.1 mpg combined, or underperforming its EPA rating in the city, and exceeding the highway estimate."
Summary: CX5 gets better city MPG, Honda wins highway MPG. And I get ~27.5 real world combined MPG in my CX5, which beats the 26.1 noted above.
But hey, they added a freakin' volume knob to the 2017 CRV... so the apocalypse is held at bay, for now.
http://www.motortrend.com/cars/honda/cr-v/2017/2017-honda-cr-v-touring-awd-first-test-review/
Last edited: