First Review! (I think)

cjb200

Member
I think this is new, but don't kill me if it's been posted :). From: AutoExpress

Mazda 3 TS2 five-door

In a competition to find the world's most industrious car manufacturer, Mazda would be a dead certainty. The Japanese company has been undergoing a massive brand transition, the central aim being to launch four all-new models in only 18 months.

It started with the 6 family car last summer, followed by the 2 supermini in the spring. A month ago, the RX-8 sports coup landed, and now the final piece of the puzzle is being slotted into place with the arrival of the 3 compact hatchback. This car has the hardest task of all - to take on and beat rivals including the Ford Focus, Vauxhall Astra and Renault Mgane.

We have been drip-fed information ever since the MX Sportif concept of the 3 was unveiled at March's Geneva Motor Show. Six months later, and the production car is about to take a bow at the Frankfurt expo in two weeks' time - but even before its debut, we've managed to sneak an exclusive first drive.

Mazda's designers have yet to pen a duff shape. The 'Zoom-zoom' mentality that created the 6 is still working its magic - the 3 looks sleek and appears long and low compared to its rivals. The distinctive nose is instantly recognisable as a blend of both 6 and 2, while the rear benefits from a strong shoulder line over the wheels and a sculpted tailgate. It's a safe, well executed design.

Inside, the same influences are on display and the 3 bears an uncanny resemblance to its big brother. This is no bad thing, as it means drivers enjoy a fine seating position and user-friendly layout. On the downside, the style is not particularly fresh and the materials aren't of as high quality as those found in the Volkswagen Golf, for example.

Neither does the car set new standards for interior space. Passengers will be comfortable, but would fare better in one or two rivals. This is surprising, as the 3 is the best indicator yet of what we can expect from Ford's next Focus.

That's because, along with the Focus C-MAX and forthcoming Volvo S40, the Mazda uses the same platform. It also borrows engines from the blue oval - 1.4, 1.6 and 2.0-litre petrol powerplants are confirmed, as are two TDCi diesels. We drove the 150bhp 2.0 petrol car.

On the road, it's immediately obvious what advances this platform offers - ride comfort and refinement. The engine feels smooth and strong, and it never becomes too intrusive. It's mated to a five-speed manual that slides silkily through the gate, giving easy access to decent performance - the 0-60mph dash takes nine seconds.

Punchy enough to test the capable chassis, the 2.0 unit is well mannered, but otherwise unexciting. Still, the 3 is a breeze to drive, with well weighted controls and prompt responses. Initial impressions also suggest it rides well. With a softer set-up than the 6 (and the current Focus, for that matter), the emphasis is more on comfort. Don't get us wrong, the 3 is very competent, but the steering does not offer the incisive turn-in or flat cornering attitude of the 6.

While it has its faults, the Mazda is a big step forward from the unloved 323. Expect aggressive pricing and generous kit. A saloon will follow, too (see our spy shots in Issue 767) - designed to tackle the SEAT Toledo and VW Bora, it may even get the 164bhp 2.3-litre unit.
__________

Handling sounds kind of disappointing, but that could differ between European and N. American models. Lets hope so.

Oh, and they obviously got the engine part backwards. Ford always gets he credit :mad:.
 
ouch.

sounds like the zoom zoom is missing. at least, in a handling point of view. :(

i wonder if the 2.0 is still the FS. and if the transmission has been refined, as i dont think you can call the current transmission silky smooth. ;)
 
The new 2.0L is a version of the new 2.3L...totally new block as compared to the now long-in-the-tooth FS block, which began life in the 1983 626...
 
"the emphasis is more on comfort. Don't get us wrong, the 3 is very competent, but the steering does not offer the incisive turn-in or flat cornering attitude of the 6"

unless that carries over to the states, Im DAMN glad that I got the MP5.
 
"While it has its faults, the Mazda is a big step forward from the unloved 323"

When they say 323 they mean the NA protege right? Is this car unloved in Europe?

-Sp
 
The 323 just didn't have enough flare for the europeans..

It was a simple car..

But Mazda was growing over the past several uears, in part because of the 323...

When I drove my cousins 323 out across the pond, it just felt like a car, nothing special, be it, it was a 1st gen 323 (Lantis).

When I then drove a Renault Clio, or was passanger in a Mazda Demio, or Fiat Multipla, or any other car, felt very different..

The P5 feels like a good european car, but that is in comparison to any american car, and even honduh...
 
the current issue of Motor Trend cites a 180 hp 2.5L optional engine......that would be nice, so we wont be left by those damn Matrices!!!:D
 
Top Gear Review:

Mazda - 3
[September 01 2003]
You know what it's like when you're about to buy a car. In a traffic jam, you look at all the other cars around you. You check out the ads in the papers and walk through supermarket car parks pushing your trolley thinking about what each car says about its owner. And you say to yourself, "No way could I drive one of those around." Or perhaps "Yeah, I could see myself in that."

It's fair to say, in the UK at least, not many people have said the latter about the current Mazda 323, a car that has taken 'forgettable' to forgettable levels of forgettable-ness. If it was bad, it would be remembered. If it was great, likewise. It's just that it's... oh, I can't remember.

That might all change when the 323's successor comes to town early next year. The Mazda3 might just do for the Focus/Golf/307 class what the 6 did for the Mondeo's. Which was to inject a bit of freshness and choice into a fairly predictable sector. And the 6 (along with the RX-8) has also given Mazda some much-needed credibility as a desirable marque.

Although the 3 is another key component in Mazda's renaissance, it's no Michelangelo. But that's not to say it's not distinctive. Styling-wise, there's a family resemblance to the sharp-looking 6 and even the RX-8 to some extent. This body is built on the platform that will also form the basis for the next Ford Focus. So considering the current Focus is one of the best handling cars you can get, then this platform can't be substandard. It isn't. That real finesse and lively feel might not be there to such a degree, but the 3 can tackle corners - understandably wimping out into understeer when tightness of bend and speed of approach become incompatible.

Cornering prowess is gained at some expense to ride quality. So far, I've tried the 1.6 and two-litre versions - the two-litre (Sport trim only) model has the tautest suspension, but in either car one soon becomes well acquainted with the lumps and bumps of uneven tarmac. The worst of these flaws will also make themselves felt through the steering.

Generally, there's a pleasing weight to the controls. The steering has some meatiness and there's substance and feel to the brake pedal. In a way, though, I prefer the 1.6-litre version. It seems to have a better balance, slightly lighter and faster steering, a nimbleness and a certain spark to it, no doubt aided by the shorter, lower gears. By comparison, the two-litre version feels almost lumpen.

Nevertheless, it'll be fascinating to find out what Ford can do with these underpinnings when the new Focus comes out in a year or so. The two-litre engine is the same as that found in the 6. It musters up 148bhp, but with 138lb ft it's not an engine renowned for its torque. Even the 3's lighter weight doesn't really make it any more interesting. Again, the 1.6 appears to be perfectly adequate.

The 3 has inherited many things from its bigger bro, such as design philosophy, engines and handling talent, but that list also includes some not so welcome aspects. The amount of cabin noise - from engine drone to road rumble to wind whistle - is at a level that I know will become wearying within an extremely short time. Just like the 6.

One 6-ism thankfully missing is the 'Argos catalogue stereo'-style centre console. Instead, the 3's fascia contains some decent quality plastics and a range of classier trims. But one area where there's some nasty, hard plastic is at the console's side that intrudes into the footwell. Poor, unusual, average-sized me kept hitting my knee against it. Peer into the instrument binnacle of the Sport and you'll find red-orange numbers on the black dial, no doubt to emphasise the 'sporting' connotation. The white-on-black of the lesser trim levels is more honest.

The Mazda3 is an infinitely more serious contender in this market than the outgoing 323, with generous interior space, some competitive prices and even a little style. Though with a new Golf, Astra and Focus on the horizon, it's still not going to have an easy time.

Colin Ryan

http://www.topgear.com/servlet/tg?D...KE=Mazda:C6&MODEL=3:XY&roadTestNumber=01.html
 
Back