Why a CX-9?
If all I was interested in was a great driving experience would this be how I spent my 35-40K? Probably not.
But the real world intrudes, and I find myself wanting a good driving experience, along with a car big enough to hold me, my wife, my three kids, groceries and other stuff.
The CX-9 is a great compromise for me, it's much more interesting to drive than a similarly priced Minivan (around ~40 for a leather/NAV/entertainment/AWD Sienna or Odysey (no AWD)), and it's third row is much more useful than most crossover's (we tried to fit my 5"2 ten year older in the third row of the pilot and MDX, hilarity ensued).
If I wasn't concerned about the third row viability I'd probably pony up the added 6-8K for an MDX with NAV+DVD, I'd probably buy an MDX (although it wasn't as fun to drive, we loved the interior and the power).
As it is, I think the CX-9 is benefitting from good positioning. When the new Highlander and other crossovers with captains in the second rows (creating at least one good seat in the third row assuming no console) get more common we will see how it stacks up.
Meanwhile I pick up mine this weekend (attn) (Galaxy Blue/Sand Leather GT with NAV + moonroof, I don't like how they designed the factory DVD to only work without the moonroof, it feels like a dungeon in the back without the moon roof)
P5w3kids said:
I drove the new Mazda CX-9 yesterday, unfortunately in Sport FWD trim. My initial impression wasn't especially positive. I don't care for the driving position or exterior styling, and the handling seemed very competent rather than enjoyable. The interior of the Sport also doesn't seem nearly as nice as that in the Grand Touring at the auto show, but I suppose this is to be expected.
No doubt others will have different expectations and impressions than I have. Many people were test driving the CX-9 yesterday despite the very cold temps. If the price isn't an issue, I think it'll sell well.
My full review:
Mazda CX-9 review
