Cool, thanks for the input.
This is my daily driver, and I do have 2 kids that will occasionally be in the back, so I don't want a teeth-rattling ride, but I do want something that handles well when I'm out for a drive or at the odd auto-x.
I understand that. FWIW I daily drive on 700/450lb springs. 100 miles per day. I've put 30k miles on it like that. It is definitely rough as hell and if I'd known I was going to be moving and commuting as much as I do, I wouldn't have built the coilover I did honestly.
I'm particularly interested in the real world difference between the 1" diameter Racing Beat (claim 3.19 times stiffer) and the 7/8" (same diameter as stock) Corksport (claim 85% stiffer) front swaybar.
Their numbers are pretty sound.
Stock sway bar(19mm) has around 350lbs of roll resistance, 25.4mm Racing Beat bar is around 1100lbs of roll resistance. 22mm Corksport bar is about 630lbs based on the numbers I've run through a calculator. The difference from 19mm to 25.4mm should be worth something like 0.3 degrees of body roll. It doesn't sound like much, but it's a lot when you think that is the difference in camber you'd need to run to keep the same contact patch.
I had Racing Beat bars on my '04 Mazda 3 and loved them - but the price difference and difference in shipping cost is not insignificant between the two.
I've looked briefly at the DDMworks bar. Has it noticeably changed the balance and feel of the car?
The DDMWorks bar was one of the first things I did to my 2. It makes a massive difference.
Racing Beat, whether self-servingly or not, claim that without the combo of front and rear bars, the stress on the rear bar installed alone may cause a failure.
I agree that is some shenanigans. A sway bar can only transfer as much weight as what is on the inside wheel. My car lifted the inside rear wheel even 100% bone stock with no sway bar changes, and on crappy tires.
A stiffer sway bar will lift the tire sooner, but it doesn't change how much weight is being applied to the beam.