Some people just like the Toyota Corolla or Honda CRV feeling of a dead unresponsive car. They like the soft floating and unresponsiveness of the suspension. For them, the Mazda is not the right choice since it is a driver car and has road feedback.
Hello all, new guy here.After 2 + years decided to join and post.I've learned alot and may be able to contribute occasionally.
Anyway, regarding ride quality,after purchasing my 2014 cx-5 touring fwd i had second thoughts because it just rode too hard sometimes.After 3000 miles I got rid of the stock yoko's and put on General Altimax rt-43 H rated tires.Ride got alot more comfortable but lost some handling response and leaned a little more in the turns.No big deal to me.I run them no less than 36 psi front and 35 psi rear.
The second improvement in ride comfort came when I complained to the dealer about a groaning/creaking sound when braking firmly especially in wet weather.Sure enough there is a TSB and they upgraded my front lower control arm bushings.I'm guessing these are the softer bushings Mazda started putting in the 2015 models at some point.The back still has the original (firmer?) suspension bushings but I don't have rear passengers so I don't know how it rides back there.
If you're running the stock 17" geolandar tires you might consider a better riding tire.I do mostly in town driving and in the first 2000 miles my yoko's wore 2/32" off in front and 1/32" in rear and get this: 1000 of the 2000 miles was highway driving.So I didn't feel too bad about getting rid of lousy riding lousy wearing tires
Didn't mean to get too windy here but wanted to give you my experience cheers, Jmaz
In that case, I do rather sell this car .....
That is true, you could reduce your wheel size and add a tire with a larger sidewall to it.
When selecting that tall tire be sure to avoid P-Metric radials. That way you can reduce tire pressure to the mid 20 PSI range just like they used in the 70's. Along with it you give up a few points in gas mileage but you'll also get to experience that vague handling in the curvy's American sedans of the era were so famous for. But it'll be a lot softer going over the bumps and pot holes. :dodgy:
The maximum inflation pressure on those old "P-Metric" US standard tires are only at 35 psi. The factory spec on my 98' Honda CR-V is at 26 psi. With current tires having maximum inflation pressure at 51 psi, I have to keep the tire pressure at 35 psi on CR-V to have an even wear.20 psi, isn't it too low for this tire? Right now I have 34 for front tires and 33 for rear tires, I think I might drop front to 32 and rear to 31 but someone said that will cost tire wear more.
20 psi, isn't it too low for this tire? Right now I have 34 for front tires and 33 for rear tires, I think I might drop front to 32 and rear to 31 but someone said that will cost tire wear more.
Cheapest route would probably be to raise the car 1 inch with springs. I'm (guessing) the stock shocks should be able to withstand a 1 inch drop so why not a 1 inch raise?
Wouldn't putting in the taller spring actually mean the spring would be firmer, and therefore a harsher ride? At any rate, raising it on the suspension while doing nothing for wheel travel means the suspension would top rather frequently with a light load, which is most of the time.
Back in the day you could change shock absorbers to firm up wheel control, improving handling on bumpy curves and braking. But that also made a harsher ride: maybe someone sells struts calibrated softer that would fit the CX-5?
When I drive my car over some bump, the car just like act very aggressive even when I brake ahead. Also when I make a turn to right, the rear seems so stiff, that make my rear passanger really uncomfortable. I checked my tire PSI, I adjusted them all to 34 PSI which exactly as the Mazda recommend, but I don't think it has anything to do with it. My tires still have very good life on it, so I don't think I will replace it soon, unless I found someway to sell them.
OP:
Your post does beg the question why did you buy the CX-5 if the ride was too harsh for your liking. All of the other CUV's we drove were plush compared to the Mazda so surely you drove at least one that was more to your liking at least comfy wise. Any of them would be.
I would ask you to reconsider your views before you fool with the tires, struts, springs, whatever. Mazda's claim to fame is handling and the drive, you know Zoom Zoom. The ride you're feeling is a FEATURE of your CX-5 not a fault. That is why CX-5 buyers own a CX-5. The silly car just flat out handles great for a top heavy family car CUV! It is FUN to drive and there isn't any comparison in the market sector. Simply none.
If you can't get beyond that then there's a dozen or more plush and comfy options waiting for you. The CX-5 resale value is outstanding so you shouldn't be behind to much on an outright sell or trade in.
Bottom line is you should be happy. If it's not a CX-5 but an Escape, or RAV4, or Santa Fe then that's cool. They're all good rigs nowadays. You should be happy with your purchase.
...Now, I am not going to change anything besides drop tire psi to 33 because I am thinking about selling it for a sedan next year or so, I like the good visibility of SUV but I really like a faster sedan car. Maybe a Lexus IS ,BMW 3 series, or Audi A4.