GI: 505 Intake Manifold Round 3

5

505zoom

Breathe

:

2003 MSP #119

• Jan 28, 2014

• #1

Looking for a batch of 10 to get the new design off the ground and produced.

Changes from the original design:

Half-round plenum.
Plenum thickness increased to .187".
Redesigned EGR hookup.
Redesigned vacuum port setup.
All-In-One main flange with machined fuel rail mounts.


Pricing will be close to the original, but may go up a little depending on final cost for the new main flange.

Who's interested?

 

Last edited: May 13, 2015

Hammo

GJ 6/ATENZA Wagon, BJ 323 SP20 (PRO5)

:

Brisbane QLD AUS

• Jan 28, 2014

• #2

Im interested

 

5

505zoom

Breathe

:

2003 MSP #119

• Jan 28, 2014

• #3

1. Hammo
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.

 

D

DOMO

Member

:

01 MP3, 03 MSP

• Jan 28, 2014

• #4

Can this be used on a supercharged setup? How about NA? Also will there need to be tuning when this is installed or can this be used on stock ecu?

 

P

protege3690

Member

:

2003.5 MSP #290

• Jan 28, 2014

• #5

1. Hammo
2. Protege3690
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.

 

P

paniaguae640

:

03.5 MSP

• Jan 28, 2014

• #6

Are we still doing payment plan like the last time?

 

T

TURBOJ1

:

Protege,ES T

• Jan 28, 2014

• #7

ABOUT TIME!!....NOW GET TO WORK!!.....JK(smoke)

 

T

TURBOJ1

:

Protege,ES T

• Jan 28, 2014

• #8

1. Hammo
2. Protege3690
3.Turboj1 (no EGR)
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.

 

Last edited: Jan 28, 2014

Hammo

GJ 6/ATENZA Wagon, BJ 323 SP20 (PRO5)

:

Brisbane QLD AUS

• Jan 28, 2014

• #9

No egr aswell

 

D

duren03msp

Member

:

2003 mazdaspeed protege

• Jan 28, 2014

• #10

1. Hammo
2. Protege3690
3.Turboj1 (no EGR)
4.Duren03msp
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.

 

D

destineal

Member

Contributor

:

Black Mica #129

• Jan 28, 2014

• #11

1. Hammo
2. Protege3690
3. Turboj1 (no EGR)
4. Duren03msp
5. Destineal
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.

 

R

rally2003

Shavin lbs!

:

1979 Trans Am, 2003.5 MSP, 2003.5 MSP, 2004 Mazda6, 2011 Mazda2

• Jan 29, 2014

• #12

How much was the last one?

 

T

TURBOJ1

:

Protege,ES T

• Jan 29, 2014

• #13

rally2003 said:

How much was the last one?

Click to expand...

'bout ate fitty'

 

P

protege3690

Member

:

2003.5 MSP #290

• Jan 29, 2014

• #14

any sketches/designs of what the new manifold will look like?

 

T

TURBOJ1

:

Protege,ES T

• Jan 29, 2014

• #15

DOMO said:

Can this be used on a supercharged setup? How about NA? Also will there need to be tuning when this is installed or can this be used on stock ecu?

Click to expand...

Not sure if there's a huge benefit on NA, but on FI applications ( WITH TUNING ) the benefits are there, more so in the mid to upper rpm range. Anything added to your engine for performance should be tuned, it could be the difference between 5hp vs 15hp. Stock ECU should benefit somewhat but not to it's true potential

 

B

Blake D

Member

:

2003.5 Mazdaspeed Protege

• Jan 29, 2014

• #16

I really would love to have one of these. if i wasn't in the middle of trying to build the motor i would be on this. if i could swing the extra cash it would be the perfect time to pick one up.

 

bwalt

:

2003.5 MSP

• Jan 30, 2014

• #17

Pictures?

 

D

duren03msp

Member

:

2003 mazdaspeed protege

• Jan 31, 2014

• #18

updates???

 

M

msp03micablack

Member

:

mazda protege speed 03

• Feb 7, 2014

• #19

can some one add me to the list im a noob dont know how to sorry for the inconvenience thanks

 

M

mspHtown

Member

:

MSP 2003.5

• Feb 7, 2014

• #20

505zoom said:

Looking for a batch of 10 to get the new design off the ground and produced.

Changes from the original design:

Half-round plenum.
Plenum thickness increased to .125".
Redesigned remote-mounted EGR hookup.
Redesigned vacuum port setup.
All-In-One main flange with machined fuel rail mounts and machined round to oval runner transition.
Larger radius velocity stack design.

I am also going to try and fit a 90* TB mounting in there (no promises on that just yet though).

Pricing will be close to the original, but may go up a little depending on final cost for the new main flange.

Who's interested?

Click to expand...

It appears there are quite a few drastic changes from the original design. I have yet to install v2 which i thought was the polished progression of v1. I know there have been reported cracks in the EGR block, so I understand the reason for changing that design. However, everything else seems like a significant digression from v2. This makes me weary of v2's capability/durability especially after dropping good coin for it. Rich, I would like to hear your thoughts.

Thanks