View Full Version : Millenia engine info
mp3moose
10-05-2004, 12:19 PM
I am looking for the engine code on for a millenia S and what supercharger it used.
BradC
10-05-2004, 12:31 PM
If I am not mistaken they were never blown.
I know they had an ad that said they had the power of a supercharged V-6, but that was due to the Miller Cycle engine being used as opposed to the Otto Cycle internal combustion engine...
mp3moose
10-05-2004, 12:33 PM
I thought the S was. I'll go check.
mp3moose
10-05-2004, 12:35 PM
Yeah the S definately was supered.
pdhaudio83
10-05-2004, 12:38 PM
yes, it was supercharged.
Captain KRM P5
10-05-2004, 12:42 PM
the 2.3 miller cycle relied on the supercharger to operate. basically, remove the SC and it no longer works.
The standard four-stroke engines described in How Car Engines Work (http://auto.howstuffworks.com/engine.htm) are called Otto-cycle engines. They are named after Nikolaus Otto, who invented this type of engine in 1867. In the same way, Diesel-cycle engines are named after inventor Rudolf Diesel.
Ralph Miller patented his Miller-cycle engine in the 1940s, and for the last several years Mazda has been using this type of engine in some of its cars.
A Miller-cycle engine is very similar to an Otto-cycle engine. The Miller-cycle uses pistons, valves, a spark plug, etc., just like an Otto-cycle engine does. There are two big differences:
A Miller-cycle engine depends on a supercharger.
A Miller-cycle engine leaves the intake valve open during part of the compression stroke, so that the engine is compressing against the pressure of the supercharger rather than the pressure of the cylinder walls. The effect is increased efficiency, at a level of about 15 percent.
Captain KRM P5
10-05-2004, 12:43 PM
also : http://www.mazda.com.au/articleZone.asp?articleZoneID=92
mp3moose
10-05-2004, 12:46 PM
Wow, interesting info about the miller cycle.
jred321
10-05-2004, 01:40 PM
"The Autorotor is a belt driven supercharger operating on the twin-screw Lysholm principle. The Lysholm principle was conceived to give three primary advantages over all other style superchargers: volumetric efficiency, reduced drive power requirement, and lowered discharge temperatures. The continuous flow path of the air charge and the internal compression ratio are the concepts that permitted the goals to be met. The net achievement is the highest volumetric and thermal efficiency ever designed into a mechanically driven supercharger. Opcon Autorotor AB has done the job well, it is clearly the premier supercharger in the world today. This marvelous achievement was acknowledged by none other than Mazda themselves by their choice of this design for the Millenia sedan. The Lysholm/Autorotor as fit to the Millenia is manufactured under Swedish license by IHI Corp. of Japan specifically for the Millenia. "
screw type, ihi manufactured supercharger. some pictures of it
http://s91196822.onlinehome.us/supercharger/supercharger.JPG
http://s91196822.onlinehome.us/supercharger/supercharger1.JPG
http://s91196822.onlinehome.us/supercharger/supercharger2.JPG
http://s91196822.onlinehome.us/supercharger/supercharger3.JPG
i don't know what the engine code is but it's very similar to the kl-03 engine. i think it's still considered a k series, but the code itself i'm not sure
<!-- / message --><!-- sig -->
Natey
10-05-2004, 01:49 PM
Was the Miller cycle used in the Milennia S a Yamaha?
mp3moose
10-05-2004, 02:44 PM
Wierd how the compression ratio is different because of the piston traveling upward with the intake valve still open. I wouldn't think that using the screw to push against would increase efficency.
mp3moose
10-05-2004, 02:45 PM
And of course this motor is a direct drop in for all proteges.
mikeyb
10-05-2004, 06:32 PM
Shouldn't this thread be in the All Mazda Forum?
vodapas77
10-05-2004, 06:40 PM
I'm thinking it was the KL-ZE but I could be completely wrong on that.
mp3moose
10-05-2004, 07:18 PM
Shouldn't this thread be in the All Mazda Forum?
probably
mp3moose
10-05-2004, 07:19 PM
I'm thinking it was the KL-ZE but I could be completely wrong on that.
No, its not at KL.
Captain KRM P5
10-06-2004, 01:04 AM
I'm thinking it was the KL-ZE but I could be completely wrong on that.
the KLZE was the JDM 2.5 like the ones that drop into Probes/626s/MX6s and maybe even....Proteges :)
mp3moose
10-06-2004, 07:29 AM
What about a millenia swap to protege, anybody got sizes on this miller cycle?
flat_black
10-06-2004, 07:48 AM
It's a 2.3 litre K series V6. KJ-ZEM. Very cool engine design, indeed. But good luck getting it to work with any ECU other than the factory one; The ECU was practically sentient, because it had to be; No intake valves means strange cam/timing adjustments.
Necessity
10-06-2004, 10:03 AM
The miller cycle engine parts are VERY expensive to replace. The millenia boards over at mazdaworld.org are filled with info on them if you want to speak to some die hards.
LinuxRacr
10-06-2004, 10:10 AM
Moved.
Captain KRM P5
10-06-2004, 12:32 PM
What about a millenia swap to protege, anybody got sizes on this miller cycle?
i honestly am of the opinion that a JDM KL-ZE swap would be a far better idea and give you much more potential to work with.
flat_black
10-06-2004, 01:55 PM
The KL-ZE is at least a conventional engine, so you have a good platform to strap an ECU to, at least. The Millenia S' engine would definitly be difficult to get working properly, even with the most advanced of engine managment options.
mazdasly75
10-27-2004, 10:15 PM
Not to mention that the "S" comes only in ATX version.....ain't no fun to drive.
210hp...and it stops there. You can expect no gain from what ever stuffs you'll hook to it. All of the goodies would have to be customized.
MACEY
10-27-2004, 11:55 PM
Would even a KL series be possible in a protege. You would have to use transmissions from the KL's and therefore I assume the axles etc as well. I mean if it would be possible for a price anywhere near a reliable complete turbo kit, then I for one would be interested. It sounds awful doubtful to me that it would fit though.
Marcus
jred321
10-28-2004, 08:44 AM
people have swapped kl's into probes that had an fs motor. probably could be done with a protege too, not worth it imho
mazdasly75
10-28-2004, 01:09 PM
people have swapped kl's into probes that had an fs motor. probably could be done with a protege too, not worth it imho
The "k" series fits perfectly into the protegé 90-94. It has the same engine bay as the mx3.
For this to be possible, you have to:
-gets engine mounts from any probe/mx6/mx3/626/millenia.
-mx3 or millenia exaust manifolds/mx3 downpipe
-curved style intake manifold from millenia/eunos 800 j-spec/mx3. The mx-6 j-spec wont fit.
-swap the brake booster from a mx3GS (V6)
-cross member from the mx3.
-and of course the ecu
-custom cat back exaust
Of course you would need a stiffer front suspension, since the engine is heavier than the little bp.
a lot of acceleration fun....
jred321
10-28-2004, 03:13 PM
i assumed the person asking meant the car he drives, i.e. a p5, not a 1g.
even so, the kl motor isn't worth the swap in my opinion.
MACEY
10-29-2004, 11:59 AM
[QUOTE=mazdasly75]The "k" series fits perfectly into the protegé 90-94. It has the same engine bay as the mx3.
For this to be possible, you have to:
-mx3 or millenia exaust manifolds/mx3 downpipe
This is a question about the down pipe. How is the down pipe different from the millenia and that found in the mx-6/pgt etc? I am curious due to the want of possibly adding hotshot/bosal headers and whether they would fit?
Marcus
mazdasly75
10-29-2004, 12:10 PM
My Kl is now tuned to 265 of N/A bhp @ 8200rpm.....isn't worth the swap like you say, but i'm still having fun on the track.
jred321
10-29-2004, 12:15 PM
umm, how? what do you have done to it? are you on pt?
mazdasly75
10-29-2004, 12:17 PM
The dowpipe is different, cause the exaust manifold is different too. If you use an exaust manifold from mx3 with mx6 downpipe, the flanges would be offsets.
The lenght of both downpipe are quite different. The mx3 is shorter than mx6/626. You would have problem fitting cat over mx6's one.
There's difference between OBDII exaust manifold and OBDI. OBDII have pre-cat, so the manifold is a bit longer. In this case you need a 96/up downpipe application.
mazdasly75
10-29-2004, 12:26 PM
My signature says....
Actually, no ones tuned correctly interprep's 9.4 cams, wich I did with the SDS unit.
Miller Time
10-31-2004, 10:21 PM
Sounds like a terrific project, even if a royal pain in the ass.
Couple of questions:
How would you handle feeding the intercoolers? There's so little clearance between the top of the engine and hood on the Millenia that Mazda integrated some of the induction plumbing into the hood. Scoops behind the grille curve up and into the hood, then back down to the 'coolers -- one at the front of the engine -- one closer to the firewall. Rubber collars seal the system when the hood is shut.
Other question is the transmission. Only autos were offered on the S. Is there a direct fit with other Mazda 5 speeds? And if so -- how do you remap the engine management system to account for the loss of traction control? Is that even an issue?
mazdasly75
11-01-2004, 07:29 PM
OK...we were talking about the millenia's 2.5L KL engine ;)
flat_black
11-01-2004, 09:16 PM
It's a KJ engine, actually. =) KJ-ZEM.
Miller Time
11-01-2004, 09:34 PM
OK...we were talking about the millenia's 2.5L KL engine ;)
Doh!
..........ahem.....never mind....nothing to see here....go back about your business....
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.7 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.