View Full Version : stock piston hp question
DubbyDoo
04-07-2008, 09:24 PM
whats the max you can get out of them before they goo boom? and also are there any forged rods that are a direct fit for them without machining them
justanothermp5
04-07-2008, 09:31 PM
i also would like to kno the answer to this, and if i could contribute a question
if u go with lower compression pistons on an NA do u lose horsepower?
because i dont want to lose my car while i get up the money to buy the parts one at a time
funktownp5
04-07-2008, 09:39 PM
Its not so much the pistons that are going to make the engine fail, its the
connecting rods that are the problem. Me personally have been running ~190
WHP for 2 years and ~230WHP for the last year without any problems. You
will also probably run into transmission problems before the motor goes too. If
you are conservative with the timing and dump alot of fuel you shouldnt have
many engine problems.
DubbyDoo
04-07-2008, 09:48 PM
well im building an engine to be around 300 whp and im wondering what the stock piston max hp is
ForceFed
04-07-2008, 09:49 PM
If you are spending the money to get your Car to 300HP...The price of new forged pistons WON'T break the bank.
It's a mere Drop in the Bucket.
Trust me.
justanothermp5
04-07-2008, 09:56 PM
ok so ingore my question? lol and im gonna be in the same range as dubby with my hp levels,
so any info would be useful, personal expierences, which brand is better and what not
ForceFed
04-07-2008, 09:58 PM
Yes..Lower compression pistons on an Identically tuned car...ie. Stock ECU tuning ....Would net less HP in NA stock form.
Captain KRM P5
04-07-2008, 10:03 PM
well im building an engine to be around 300 whp and im wondering what the stock piston max hp is
if you're building an engine for 300hp you will need rods. seeing that without machining the piston or the rod to accept one another, you won't be able to use the factory piston with an aftermarket rod. and you won't be making 300hp on the factory rods. there are the few guys out there with what seem like flawless tunes who can make 280hp on the factory engine. this is far from the norm most people with popped protege motors will tell you.
so then the question becomes, do you need to go lower compression to make 300hp. most pistons come in two trims on the shelf; 8.5:1 (lower) or 9.1:1 (stock). lowering the compression ratio does alot of things; it allows for cooler combustion temperatures, exponentially more boost to be run than on higher compression, less risk of detonation with proper tuning and the ability to run more timing while running increased boost. more timing equates to more power, typically more power than just changing the fuel settings. you may hear that you lose low end or torque or low end power with going lower compression, and frankly thats pretty subjective person to person at best. being able to run more boost and run more timing in boost thereby making more power far outweighs any disadvantage, perceived or otherwise, by running a half point lower compression piston. plus if you have a standalone, its very easy to increase power in the low end and compensate there for any lower compression 'loss'.
most of the highest dynoing and fastest 1/4 mile proteges i know of run 8.5:1 or lower. this really is not a debatable fact. once you get close to 300whp you start encountering whole new sets of problems - blowing out spark, insufficiently flowing heads, weak coils, high combustion temps. the higher the compression ratio, the more you are going to accentuate these problems. besides, if you are spending the several thousands needed to build a 300hp motor, it would be pretty nice to have it be able to go beyond that should you ever be inclined to build the transmission to handle more power yet. to me, there really isn't a compelling argument to building a stock compression motor especially if your goal hovers around 300hp.
and for the person who asked up top, lowering the compression ratio of an N/A would most definetely lose horsepower. if you want to stay N/A, higher compression is the way to go.
justanothermp5
04-07-2008, 10:08 PM
ken u are the man, and im not staying NA, just wondering if i could still drive the car with the pistons before i put the turbo in, and u answered that
just have to save up now, alot lol
ForceFed
04-07-2008, 10:11 PM
and for the person who asked up top, lowering the compression ratio of an N/A would most definetely lose horsepower. if you want to stay N/A, higher compression is the way to go.
Didn't I just say that? (braindead
LOL!
dmjddm9999
04-07-2008, 10:16 PM
to produce 300whp your definatley going to need to install forged piston and rods. Our stock internals are only rated for about 250whp.
ForceFed
04-07-2008, 10:18 PM
to produce 300whp your definatley going to need to install forged piston and rods. Our stock internals are only rated for about 250whp.Good luck keeping a Stock Rod Straight at 250HP.
justanothermp5
04-07-2008, 10:22 PM
Didn't I just say that? (braindead
LOL!
oh sorry, didnt give u credit
ur the man!!
there happy? lol
ForceFed
04-07-2008, 10:24 PM
Sure...LOL!
jeffmsp
04-07-2008, 11:32 PM
it also depends on what fuel you are planning on using and the overall efficiency of your system. If you run 91, then you are going to have to lower it.
SeR_Cyclops
04-07-2008, 11:35 PM
hey 250 is not close to rich's 275!?!?!?!
jeffmsp
04-08-2008, 11:19 AM
or tekkies 255whp stock motor dynos. or blkzoomzooms 250whp+ stock motor 100+ runs on the track...
Captain KRM P5
04-08-2008, 03:59 PM
hey 250 is not close to rich's 275!?!?!?!
rich is one of the very few - on pump gas i might add, actually he is exactly who i was thinking of when i made that post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.7 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.