PDA

View Full Version : NA is best.


pluto316
06-22-2006, 11:54 AM
(rtfm)
JCell
06-22-2006, 11:59 AM
Power.... the is no substitute :)
silverspeed03
06-22-2006, 12:08 PM
Doesn't look like I have a choice.(scratch)
jsahyoun
06-22-2006, 12:36 PM
Not correct is my vote!
pluto316
06-22-2006, 01:13 PM
NA is the best is the only correct answer.
Rac3rX
06-22-2006, 01:44 PM
worthless thread
Boosted03MSP
06-22-2006, 01:53 PM
where is the option that says "boost owns NA all day and night" ?
jtmp3
06-22-2006, 02:13 PM
What is this about, I was N/A and then turbo and back to N/A. CAr runs better now and more reliable now but was faster turbo'd. So, in conclusion I like it better N/A.
Bu11dogg2
06-22-2006, 02:14 PM
N/A sucks
BradC
06-22-2006, 02:15 PM
I think he is talkin' Miata's here people, I vote NA w/NB a close 2!
pluto316
06-22-2006, 02:23 PM
NA is the first generation Miata, people.
Rac3rX
06-22-2006, 02:34 PM
Yeah NA

Not Aplicable
MiaTurbo
06-22-2006, 04:27 PM
NA is the first generation Miata, people.lol.. Non miada people are the lose..
TougeSpeed
06-22-2006, 10:35 PM
NA is the SHeet!
MazKid
06-22-2006, 11:58 PM
NA is the best. NB 2nd, NC in a distant 3rd(sorry folks, I like the car but compared to the NA and NB the feel is completely off for me).
kcbhiw
06-23-2006, 09:20 AM
N/A sucks

F/I blows.


har.
Gaboost
06-24-2006, 06:57 PM
NB FTW, I am baised though. I've never driven a NA before, maybe I should try one out.
MazKid
06-24-2006, 07:03 PM
NB FTW, I am baised though. I've never driven a NA before, maybe I should try one out.

Beware, you might end up buying it.
Gaboost
06-24-2006, 07:38 PM
A early na would be a nice project car. Would it be wrong to put a S2000 engine into it lol.
SilverBulletES
06-25-2006, 04:04 AM
NA is definitely roomier than the NB. And air brakes are da bomb. Anyone who's watched Top Gun knows this.
pluto316
06-25-2006, 11:59 AM
A early na would be a nice project car. Would it be wrong to put a S2000 engine into it lol.

(peep)
Gaboost
06-25-2006, 01:25 PM
(peep)

Now THAT is an na I would love to have. It's at least a few hundred lbs. lighter than a s2k, with that engine it would be fast no doubt.
pluto316
06-25-2006, 04:19 PM
Now THAT is an na I would love to have. It's at least a few hundred lbs. lighter than a s2k, with that engine it would be fast no doubt.

For the cost you could just turbo a NA and get the same results.
Roywhitep5
06-25-2006, 04:34 PM
yeah but the the s2k motor would be so much cooler!
miataguy2cyprus
06-26-2006, 04:34 AM
Yeah NA

Not Aplicable

(owned)
MiaTurbo
06-26-2006, 10:24 PM
yeah but the the s2k motor would be so much cooler!how about a boosted S2k motor? :D
Pretzellogic
06-26-2006, 11:39 PM
how about a boosted S2k motor? :D
... aaaaaaaaaand FIGHT!