PDA

View Full Version : A new type of internal combustion engine



peepsalot
01-09-2006, 01:24 AM
Check out this new engine design.
The REVETEC Engine design consists of two counter-rotating “trilobate” (three lobed) cams geared together, so both cams contribute to forward motion. Two bearings run along the profile of both cams (four bearings in all) and stay in contact with the cams at all times. The bearings are mounted on the underside of the two inter-connected pistons, which maintain the desired clearance throughout the stroke. The two cams rotate and raise the piston with a scissor-like action to the bearings. Once at the top of the stroke the air/fuel mixture is fired. The expanded gas then forces the bearings down the ramps of the cams spreading them apart ending the stroke. The point of maximum mechanical advantage or transfer is around 10deg ATDC (the piston moving approximately 5% of its travel) making the most of the high cylinder pressure.

This compares to a conventional engine that reaches maximum mechanical advantage around 60deg ATDC. (after the piston has moved through 40% of its travel, losing valuable cylinder pressure). The effective cranking distance is determined by the length from the point of bearing contact to the centre of the output shaft (NOT the stroke). A conventional engine's turning distance is half of the piston stroke. The piston acceleration throughout the stroke is controlled by the cam “grind” which can be altered to give acceleration to suit a certain fuel and/or torque application. This also allows different port timing on opposite strokes, increasing efficiency on 2-Stroke engines.

The piston assembly slides rigidly through the block eliminating piston to cylinder-bore contact. This reduces wear and lubrication requirements. This also reduces piston shock to a negligible amount making ceramic technology suitable. One module which comprises of a minimum of five moving components, produces six power strokes per revolution. Increasing the number of lobes on each cam to five produces ten power strokes without increasing the number of components. The CCE integrates well with existing power plants and can utilise almost all existing engine technology with increased efficiency.


Summaries of CCE advantages are as follows:




approximately one quarter the size and weight of a conventional engine (for similar applications) combined with improved output substantially increases power/weight and torque/weight ratio.


fewer moving and total components. As a result of fewer components, more easily manufactured than conventional engines.


identical cylinder head assembly (“top end”) to conventional engines. Most existing head technology can be either adapted or utilised.


Flexible design - can be four-stroke, two-stroke, petrol, diesel or gas, natural of forced aspiration.


Eliminated irregularly reciprocating components such as connecting rods.


Output shaft can be run in either direction if multilobed cams with symmetrical lobes are employed.


All rotational forces are counteracted via the counter rotating cam – eliminates the need for a heavy flywheel.


Torque and power output can be varied using a fixed capacity and piston stroke.


The CCE can be designed to operate at greatly reduced operating speeds while delivering high torque output.


Substantial reduction in stroke reduces heat loss through cylinder wall.


Extended piston dwell is possible because engine design allows a lower than normal compression ratio to be used reducing power loss from compression cycle.


Maximum mechanical advantage can be applied to output shaft at only 10 degrees ATDC utilising high cylinder pressure early in the stroke, compared to around 60 degrees ATDC for conventional engines.


Lower emissions can be achieved due to increased control over combustion.


Extremely low idle speed due to increase in mechanical efficiency at the top of the stroke.


Little or no bore contact/piston side thrust, which reduces wear on cylinder bore.


Can have different port timing on compression stroke than power stroke allowing better control two-stroke).


Lower centre of gravity.


Due to controlled piston acceleration rates the CCE reduces engine vibration.


A hollow output shaft can be utilised for specialty applications, such as peristaltic pumps.

http://www.revetec.com/

http://www.revetec.com/files/_images/cce2004_05.preview.jpg
http://www.revetec.com/files/_images/DSC_0195.preview.jpg
http://www.revetec.com/files/_images/ccedemo5.gifhttp://www.revetec.com/files/_images/ccegifani21.gif

Videos:
http://www.revetec.com/?q=system/files&file=CCE3-002.wmv
http://www.revetec.com/?q=system/files&file=CCE3-008.wmv
http://www.revetec.com/?q=system/files&file=RLE5-002.wmv

jersey_emt
01-09-2006, 01:50 AM
Very interesting.

REMillers
01-09-2006, 01:53 AM
My gawd it looks like a rotary and a piston had sex and thus the offspring.

Hmm, wonder if anyone will pick it up for further R&D.

Roywhitep5
01-10-2006, 01:40 AM
i hope mazda buys it

peepsalot
01-10-2006, 02:00 PM
Ok, I'm gonna bump this cause I think it's sweet. A couple things though.

From reading the history page, the first prototype was made 10 years ago, and it looks as if there hasn't been a whole lot of activity in the past couple years. I can't tell if this company is going under or what.

The description claims that one advantage is it has fewer moving parts, but it actually seems to be much more complex than a standard otto engine. What am I missing?

Anyone watch the short video clips? That thing sounds like a lawnmower, lol.

Discuss.

Roywhitep5
01-10-2006, 08:40 PM
i dont understand how the power is transfered to the crank shaft with counter rotating dealies

vindication
01-10-2006, 08:48 PM
interesting, looks weak though

chuyler1
01-10-2006, 09:04 PM
i dont understand how the power is transfered to the crank shaft with counter rotating dealies
I don't either. It says both contribute to the stroke...but one is spinning in the opposite direction...how does that work?

Mike R
01-10-2006, 09:14 PM
Think I saw that a couple years back. Still kinda confusing.

Mazdamia
01-10-2006, 09:21 PM
I don't either. It says both contribute to the stroke...but one is spinning in the opposite direction...how does that work?


I stroke in both directions. It's not that hard.

Roywhitep5
01-11-2006, 02:56 PM
bump for someone to explain the counter rotating thing

peepsalot
01-11-2006, 03:18 PM
I think it has something to do with those two big gears on the main shaft. Maybe one spins with the main shaft and the other spins oppositely around it, connected directly to that cam lobes that are spinning in reverse also. Then the little gears inside the bottom of the housing reverse the direction somehow.

Mazdamia
01-11-2006, 08:24 PM
I think it has something to do with those two big gears on the main shaft. Maybe one spins with the main shaft and the other spins oppositely around it, connected directly to that cam lobes that are spinning in reverse also. Then the little gears inside the bottom of the housing reverse the direction somehow.


Shafts and Spinners...I love this thread. (stash)

Spooled
01-12-2006, 12:46 PM
Wow, I'm glad someone bumped this thread. What a cool engine design. No more broken rods! I really like the fact that you can grind the cams to give a long power stroke and a short exhaust stroke.

I see they have the engine in a Ute. Must be in Australia or something.

My ideal engine setup would be a Revetec bottom end matched with a Coates SRVS head, DISI, and a big turbo. mmmmmmmmmmmm

chuyler1
01-12-2006, 12:55 PM
I wonder how the Revtech would respond to a turbo...but that's getting a bit ahead of things.

terbow
01-12-2006, 12:59 PM
I believe it is in Austrailia. When i first read about Revtec a while ago thats where they said it was from

igdrasil
01-21-2006, 11:35 AM
It sucks...

Does anybody knows what Innovation means?

If we still continue using pistons in engines, humanity will never progress.

And I think they stole the idea, Ive seen this engine long before, and it looked different.