how fast? [Archive] - Mazdas247.com

Libra

09-28-2005, 10:48 PM

mz304

09-29-2005, 12:58 AM

I didn't run a stock 2.0 down the track, but I did run my stock 2.3 (AT) down the open road. Speed tops out at 118 before the speed limiter kicks in, and I can go from 0-60 in about 8 seconds, unofficially.
i ran a 15.6 stock on my 2.0 and i top out my car a 120..the books say the 2.3 is going down the track at 15.9

Puckpimp71

09-29-2005, 01:48 AM

The 06 2.0 has some balls. Driving both the 06 2.3 and 2.0 back to back, the 2l feels quicker... hmmm

BC3I

09-29-2005, 02:02 AM

what state do u live in? what kind of weather conditions was it cause thats amazing for a 2.0L

Captain KRM P5

09-29-2005, 02:26 AM

what state do u live in? what kind of weather conditions was it cause thats amazing for a 2.0L

agreed (boom07)

BC3I

09-29-2005, 03:18 AM

mainly cause i have a 2.0L granted i haven't taken it to the track but i doubt that it would put out those kind of numbers stock...and mine is not stock

FLAMEBOY

09-29-2005, 04:47 AM

mainly cause i have a 2.0L granted i haven't taken it to the track but i doubt that it would put out those kind of numbers stock...and mine is not stock

maybe those are number from G-tech... not legit time slip... :P i dunno, could be wrong... i thought the 2.0lt meant to be around 16-16.2 for 1/4 mile?

SpicyMchaggis

09-29-2005, 06:23 AM

i ran a 15.6 stock on my 2.0 and i top out my car a 120..the books say the 2.3 is going down the track at 15.9

(hmm)

Mazda3ofKent

09-29-2005, 09:38 AM

those are big numbers my Gtech numers are 15.9-15.6, but i dont put alot a faith in them I had one run that it said i ran a 10.3

mz304

09-29-2005, 03:39 PM

what state do u live in? what kind of weather conditions was it cause thats amazing for a 2.0L
i live in hawaii ..i dont know i think its the driver then>..

BC3I

09-29-2005, 04:07 PM

i think that its pretty much impossible to make a stock 2.0L i model run a 15.6-15.9 sorry

JOS3

09-29-2005, 08:28 PM

im calling a defenite BS on this one. NO WAY a stock 2.0 is running 15.X

smp3000

09-29-2005, 08:40 PM

13.8

BC3I

09-29-2005, 08:42 PM

im calling a defenite BS on this one. NO WAY a stock 2.0 is running 15.X

agreed (werd)

mz304

09-30-2005, 03:30 AM

i think that its pretty much impossible to make a stock 2.0L i model run a 15.6-15.9 sorry
its the driver thats y ... you cant drive sorry!!!!!

BC3I

09-30-2005, 03:45 AM

hey chill man i wasn't raggin on ya..just saying that its pretty much impossible for that to happen on a stock 3i model dosen't matter if John Force was driving it it can't happen

BC3I

09-30-2005, 04:09 AM

ok so we can clear this up who has run there 3i or s model - 4 door on the 1/4 mile? times please and what mods do you have?

oh btw look hereMazda 3 test results (http://www.caranddriver.com/article.asp?section_id=3&article_id=7566&page_number=3)

rbmazda3

09-30-2005, 07:47 AM

I've seen the breakdown of the 2.0L as well in a car mag and the numbers were higher than the 2.3L as you would suspect. I think it was R&T. I'm searching now...

JOS3

09-30-2005, 07:51 AM

13.8

*shakes fist* well thanks for your iput mr. 'i have an evo'

racer x 3

09-30-2005, 10:26 AM

2004 3s 2.3 sedan open road #'s (stop watches and walkie talkies used over a course of three runs then averaged) BUT STILL UNNOFFICIAL... and i know the focus is the 2.0 but just tryin..

1/4 mile- undetermined but in the neighborhood of 15.4
0-60- 7.7 sec
0-100-14 sec even
top speed (then limiter kicks in): 121

temp:74 F
alt: roughly 2000 ft above sea level

(deadhorse sorry.... ha

FLAMEBOY

10-01-2005, 04:29 AM

its the driver thats y ... you cant drive sorry!!!!!

(boom07)

well, its possible, if the 1/4 mile track is DOWN SLOPE... (hah)

mz304

10-01-2005, 06:56 PM

(boom07)

well, its possible, if the 1/4 mile track is DOWN SLOPE... (hah)
that to but i know the track is not down slop.. and the 2.0 is lighter then the 2.3

racer x 3

10-01-2005, 08:37 PM

that to but i know the track is not down slop.. and the 2.0 is lighter then the 2.3

just my two cents.... i dinno know man, thats.....a tough sell...
but if im giving you the benefit of the doubt,........ nice run....?

mp5jeff

10-01-2005, 09:05 PM

2.0 ran 15.6 stock? haha ok, timeslip? i ran a 16.0 in the 2.3 stock, so i tied car and driver, and i was getting the worst 60' ever, think my best was 2.3x, ps what was your trap speed mz304 since you aren't going to post a timeslip im sure....

BC3I

10-01-2005, 11:09 PM

that to but i know the track is not down slop.. and the 2.0 is lighter then the 2.3
by like a 100lbs! please need a better excuse than that or prove it by showing a slip! (jerkit)

Curb weight (lbs)
2.0L i MT 2,696 (PZEV = 2,718) 2.0L i AT 2,738 (PZEV = 2,760)
2.3L 4dr s & SP23 MT 2,762 5dr 2,826
2.3L 4dr s & SP23 AT 2,807 5dr 2,857

Puckpimp71

10-02-2005, 11:42 PM

100lbs lighter and only a 12hp difference, 10hp for '06. I think the 2.3 has nicer power band, though.

ZoomVT

10-03-2005, 12:26 PM

GI? is that you?

racer x 3

10-04-2005, 02:09 PM

a buddy of mine hit the track this week end and ran a 1/4 mile in his 5speed 05 sedan 2.0l currently stock......

and he's damn good...usually a week-end warrior moving down as hes getting older from an impreza 22b (sold for $60,000(!?)... anyway...

BEST TIME: 16.x (.7or .8?)......... not 15.6...

ZoomVT

10-04-2005, 04:57 PM

blah

hyck

10-05-2005, 07:31 PM

I have a 2l and I went to the track last week. It was my first time on the track so I don't think I did that good, but my best time was 16.5, I will try to scan my timeslip and I'll post

hyck

10-05-2005, 07:37 PM

forgot to mansion The only mod is a intake, it's a 5speed, and I striped it prety good, I left only the driver's seat

smp3000

10-05-2005, 08:10 PM

You live in a mansion?

BC3I

10-05-2005, 08:51 PM

forgot to mansion The only mod is a intake, it's a 5speed, and I striped it prety good, I left only the driver's seat
wow...geeze that must have been fun

hyck

10-06-2005, 10:25 PM

ups sorry .... forgot to mention The only mod is a intake, it's a 5speed, and I striped it prety good, I left only the driver's seat

BC3I

10-09-2005, 01:05 AM

im gonna try to go to LACR and race on friday to see what i get...if i do go i will post the runs

jbass

10-09-2005, 11:49 PM

With the 2 liters I had:

15.829 with: flywheel, exhaust, intake, SSK, jack and spare taken out and heavy 17's

14.16: same thing than the things listed on my first run + 55hp nitrous

next year I'll go with crazy light 15 inches rim to see what I can do...

BC3I

10-10-2005, 03:40 AM

nautical2086

10-10-2005, 07:36 AM

I dont really believe the 2.0 is quicker than the 2.3, 2.3 is deff quicker.

BC3I

10-10-2005, 11:24 AM

we're not sayin that...this is where us 2.0L owners get to brag about our shit...well sort of....the only thing i must add is this, Juan from Hiboost noted that the 2.0L responded much better to the Turbo than the 2.3L so maybe the 2.0L is more "mod friendly"